Contact: Private Message
| Type | Subject | By: | Posted: | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| News Posting | froggys? | Anonymous | Jan 9th, 2003 | Default |
| who would want to be a frog lol ide rather be a cuddly little sarnak | ||||
| News Posting | new expansion but FROGS?!?! | Anonymous | Jan 9th, 2003 | Default |
| why the hell dont' they just come out with something good for once...thiers humns, iksars, woody elves, and friggin almost all the other normal races. if they're gonna make a new race screw the damn frogloks, they suck arse. i'd rather be something that resembles more of a god type figure but not e | ||||
| News Posting | new race | Anonymous | Jan 9th, 2003 | Default |
| why not little grey men for the UFO in qeynos lol but seriously a cooler race would work something not even in the game at all so far and have the story be that they were released from the past something humanoid that dosnt look gay and have it able to be a monk to lol only 2 monk ra | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: ring | REDACTED | Jan 9th, 2003 | Decent |
| It's possible, but I doubt many hybrids would care about it besides someone like muoi. What's with warriors & monks getting FT items these days though? Seems a little STOOPID...but then again what can I expect? [link=http://www.magelo.com/eq_view_profile.html?num=338886] Renmazuo Skoaldiak | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Good Luck... | REDACTED | Jan 9th, 2003 | Default |
| hmmm...since the only melees equipable are SK, Pally, and ranger...and they are all mana users, it's going to be raid points allocated to any who desire it | ||||
| News Posting | Consider The Source | REDACTED | Jan 9th, 2003 | Decent |
| To the average "non-EQer" we are odd, strange, and a puzzle. I have many friends who do not play ( including my hubby ) who are baffeled at the time I devote to this game. HERE LIES THE TRUTH...it is a game. We all know it and play of our own free will. If I choose to be out every evening, | ||||
| News Posting | RE: new race | Anonymous | Jan 9th, 2003 | Default |
| Why not a simian race (ape) with high dexterity and low ambition. A race that prefers to sit around and smoke reefer, drink ale and scratch thier rear ends! Kinda like a race of college students. | ||||
| News Posting | RE: new race | Anonymous | Jan 9th, 2003 | Default |
| Why not a simian race (ape) with high dexterity and low ambition. A race that prefers to sit around and smoke reefer, drink ale and scratch thier rear ends! Kinda like a race of college students. | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Definite SK item | REDACTED | Jan 9th, 2003 | Decent |
| Any Warrior that is working on trade skills every point helps[:boozing] | ||||
| EQ Item | /sigh | REDACTED | Jan 9th, 2003 | Default |
| Wow, you think this effect is lame? Erm...let's see, ultravision is really nice for any race, as none of the druidic races have ultravision. See invis is also quite nice as you wouldn't have to ever cast that on yourself and would be able to trade out a slot with a see-invis effect on it. And c | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: /sigh | REDACTED | Jan 9th, 2003 | Excellent |
| Gah, on my roomates screen name, heh. I swear I'm not a chanter, Lol. -Reakwon Dachef -63 Drood -Xev | ||||
| EQ Item | jeeze | REDACTED | Jan 9th, 2003 | Decent |
| 20 wis 150 mana on range. Hell is freezing over. And afterlife is santa leading the raid. | ||||
| EQ Item | regen | REDACTED | Jan 9th, 2003 | Decent |
| Every hybrid I know cares alot about mana regen, The other day I was grped with 2 bards on a raide twisting seperate mana regen songs. I only have one FT 1 item and Kei on and there songs was something like 60 + combined mana per tick I never went oom useing grp heals and assist healing the entire | ||||
| EQ Item | Monk Item? Greedy arse monks! | REDACTED | Jan 9th, 2003 | Default |
| Does anybody else want to decapitate these fool manks who try to take ALL caster gear? Here's a hint, monks: Casters don't have alot of str That's why our gear is light... Hmmm... Lets's see, Flowing Though, +mana, +10 to Int and Wis.. If I were in a guild who gave this to a monk, they | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: ring | REDACTED | Jan 9th, 2003 | Excellent |
| wow, today im in agreeance with many peeps.... and Lord Anbori is no exception granted the stats are GREAT for any and every class, but war/monk usable boggles me. if i saw a war/monk rolling on this id be all "ill rochambeau you for it"(see southpark) FT3 is great, and usually rese | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: hmm | REDACTED | Jan 9th, 2003 | Default |
| yea we need this effect as much as we need c3 or as much as a wizzy needs something like improved damage but hey my ranger would love this | ||||
| EQ Item | Wow | REDACTED | Jan 10th, 2003 | Default |
| Only word that has to be said... wow. Pair this sob up with the Sigil Earring of Vercity, oh I luv to dream, how about you? | ||||
| EQ Item | Tug of War | REDACTED | Jan 10th, 2003 | Decent |
| Kinda cool they added a melee effect as well as a caster effect, but man...talk about a tough dicision on who to award this. I say Beastlord, due to it's hybrid style stats. Monk has no use for Mana Preservation. Druids have no use for an attack buff. Beastlord on the otherhand can use both. | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Yeah | REDACTED | Jan 10th, 2003 | Decent |
| the total lack of a sense of humor is amazing. | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Yeah | REDACTED | Jan 10th, 2003 | Default |
| When these two (Lendily and Winshin) run about and post the same drivel on every item, the humor wears thin quickly. | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Tug of War | REDACTED | Jan 10th, 2003 | Decent |
| I agree i am a officer in a guild as well. This item is a bsl weapon all the way....The effect is a melee only effect(will that drops druid out of the race... Then the focus effect is mana preservation(will that drops monks out of the running as well... That leaves only the beastlords to grab this | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Tug of War | REDACTED | Jan 10th, 2003 | Default |
| I have to agree with the idea that this goes to a bst before the other 2 classes mainly because the vengeance effect would be wasted on a druid as no sane druid would mellee with an item that increases hate and if they were to thats just one more rez to do, also it's effects to suit a bst more then | ||||
| EQ Item | Nerfed | REDACTED | Jan 10th, 2003 | Default |
| They've changed it. I looted one of these last night not secondary equipable and no Damage bonus. | ||||
| EQ Item | Uses? | REDACTED | Jan 10th, 2003 | Decent |
| Anyone know what this is used for? | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: PotC | REDACTED | Jan 10th, 2003 | Default |
| They list the item as Level to Attain: 51 cause thats when the effect works for you and you get full use of stats. How they have you listed as Scholar is beyond me as you have proberly never had a real thought abut anything. Think before you post flaming people. | ||||
| Page | Subject | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| EQ Monster | Difficulty after SoF... nah | Jan 06 2008 1:15pm | Decent |
| Preview: | If you are working on your 1.5 just a little info for those who don't raid and don't have a bottomless pit of friends to help on demand. Solo'd thi ... | ||
| EQ Item | correction | Dec 12 2007 1:55pm | Decent |
| Preview: | ink additive of the nameless, not ro's ink additive | ||
| EQ Spell | hmm | Nov 16 2007 1:28pm | Decent |
| Preview: | Neither, it's player made (research)... recipe undiscovered as of this post. | ||
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC