| Page | Subject | Date | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| EQ Monster | Difficulty after SoF... nah | Jan 06 2008 1:15pm | Decent |
| Preview: | If you are working on your 1.5 just a little info for those who don't raid and don't have a bottomless pit of friends to help on demand. Solo'd thi ... | ||
| EQ Item | correction | Dec 12 2007 1:55pm | Decent |
| Preview: | ink additive of the nameless, not ro's ink additive | ||
| EQ Spell | hmm | Nov 16 2007 1:28pm | Decent |
| Preview: | Neither, it's player made (research)... recipe undiscovered as of this post. | ||
| Type | Subject | By: | Posted: | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQ Item | aww yah? | REDACTED | Dec 8th, 2002 | Good |
| >>>from the looks of all the pop equipment kinda makes me think the developers thought they added too much uber loot to luclin so they tried to tone it down or something From the sound of comments like these, it makes me think that they gave too much brains to some people before and dec | ||||
| EQ Item | Wrong Stats | REDACTED | Dec 8th, 2002 | Default |
| The Inspect Box posted here is wrong compared to the one I have... Hmmm... Mine has a 3(5) for int, not just an outright 5 int. All the other stats are the same way, a low base stat with a () next to it for when you reach level 50. I used this as a replacement for my Sarnak Ceremonial dagger and | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Yeah right | REDACTED | Dec 8th, 2002 | Decent |
| most bards would have their epic in offhand for the all instrument effect. Having this in the range would allow bards to free up one of the eight spell slots (plus the excellent stats). | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: PC | REDACTED | Dec 8th, 2002 | Decent |
| I picked one up last night in the Bazaar. There were 3 for sale...High was 1K, I got the low bid at 750p. this seems to be the average range on the Torv server. | ||||
| EQ Item | twinking versus non twinking | REDACTED | Dec 8th, 2002 | Decent |
| *shaking my head as I read most of the posts posted here* Okay I have one question. What is wrong with folks not twinking? Nothing. What is wrong with twinking? nothing. My philosophy is this.... if you have higher toons an wish to twink do it....if your a new gamer level 1 and want to work | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: reagents | REDACTED | Dec 8th, 2002 | Decent |
| The spoiler on eqtraders says, that the mobs needed to get the 2nd reagent are in the tunnel under PoJ. Where can the entrance to these tunnels be found? | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: bring it on | REDACTED | Dec 9th, 2002 | Default |
| To let you know about the ranger skill caps...By lvl 50, they still only have 200 skill in weapon skills (just like pal/sk), but post 50, ranger's skills increase really quickly (5 per lvl I think), where pal/sk skills only increase 3 per lvl. So soon after lvl 50, rangers will have the same skills | ||||
| EQ Quest | RE: MQ or Help with Neriak & Oggok... | REDACTED | Dec 9th, 2002 | Decent |
| umm k confused??? how did you hurt your faction there?? i did this quest at 24 using illusion spells and benevolence (and eb lots of swimmin involved raised skill tho) or do you follow a deity and thats why your faction isnt great? If your agnostic no need for faction otherwise play with those | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: What Lv | REDACTED | Dec 10th, 2002 | Default |
| Yes. You can equip with minimized stats, but the lower stats are still good and worth it. The wis is like 5 if you are not rec. level | ||||
| EQ Quest | RE: Flowing Thought | REDACTED | Dec 11th, 2002 | Default |
| it also stacks with the bard singing claritys. like cassindras chourus of clarity. | ||||
| EQ Item | These rock | REDACTED | Dec 11th, 2002 | Decent |
| Did this quest yesterday with a 62 Druid, 61 Cleric and a 60 Shadow Knight. Quite easy too. All 4 mobs are casters (Paladin, Cleric, Shaman, Wizard). The Dorf Cleric was the toughest out of them all. | ||||
| EQ Item | Not just on Legends | Ealon | Dec 11th, 2002 | Decent |
| Dropped off Charayan the Crusader, one of the new dragons in Skyshrine, on Bristlebane server | ||||
| EQ Item | Pointless so far | REDACTED | Dec 11th, 2002 | Decent |
| Tried this on my 52 necro. Doesn't affect pet spells. Doesn't affect summon corpse. Anyone tried it with conjure corpse? | ||||
| EQ Quest | How I got Tanik to pop | REDACTED | Dec 11th, 2002 | Decent |
| First I made a hotkey saying "I will help" Then I put pet on guard, just off the end of the ramp and walked the direction the pet pointed say "I will Help" the whole way. He popped the first time within like 10 sec. Before that I just ran in direction dog pointed and triggered | ||||
| EQ Item | hmmm | REDACTED | Dec 11th, 2002 | Default |
| after 4 days camping PoD's castle interior, i've seen 2 drop...i got one while grouped with a fella who said it was for a quest for a robe i lubs robes . . . any info on where? if i had to guess i'd say crypt of decay...but only based on proximity 60 enc fennin ro | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Parchments | REDACTED | Dec 11th, 2002 | Decent |
| With the other classes I've seen, the merchant who sells your new PoP spells (They're no drop so easy to find) is the guy/gal/creature you turn in your parchments to. I've turned them in for chanter, cleric, wizard and druid spells so far, and for each of those classes at least this has held tr | ||||
| EQ Item | waste of time | REDACTED | Dec 11th, 2002 | Sub-Default |
| This is a total waste of time for druids and shaman at the higher levels of the game unless you are power leveling a newbie. The effect it has only effects spells which are level 44 or less. A druid and shaman best spell at that level is greater heal. No druid or shaman past level 51 would ever both | ||||
| News Posting | RE: sorry | REDACTED | Dec 11th, 2002 | Decent |
| I do thank you very much and is a perfictly acceptiable pastime :) | ||||
| News Posting | RE: My Humble Opinion | REDACTED | Dec 11th, 2002 | Default |
| [quote]and can only advise the author of this article to also try and reconnect with reality, and as we say in dear ol' England 'Wake up and smell the coffee'.[/quote] Try clicking on Allakhazam's name and you tell him to "wake up and smell the coffee." As you say in ol'England. | ||||
| EQ Item | Names... | REDACTED | Dec 11th, 2002 | Default |
| Ancient central American indian gods... VI is going nuts looking for inspiriation here. Yes, I know the spelling is different, but the similarity is obvious. | ||||
| EQ Item | i agree with the rogue | REDACTED | Dec 12th, 2002 | Decent |
| I have the duplicate to this tunic and its called the Bestial Tunic dropped off of Ali the named treant in PoG before killing tunare. Very nice tunic of course most armor drops in PoG are stat wise the same as the thurg quest armor almost easier to go to plane of growth and kill lots o mobs for the | ||||
| EQ Item | Blech | REDACTED | Dec 12th, 2002 | Sub-Default |
| Gratz Afterlife on an inferior Dain belt :\ Hope the mob was yard trash. Rollen | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: You are all nuts | REDACTED | Dec 12th, 2002 | Decent |
| I must agree with Nortan... "if you didn't want to play a character with disabilities, why'd you create a monk?" Every character has disabilities. So monks are very weak... most pure casters are as well. If you are in a group you can get STR buffs anyway... and there are STR items out t | ||||
| EQ Item | RE: Names... | REDACTED | Dec 12th, 2002 | Default |
| VI does not run Everquest anymore, they were bought out by Sony Online Entertainment (SoE), SoE took up all design, naming, and quest layouts for PoP, not VI. Also, it doesn't really matter if they do make up a name similiar to the Aztec god of the sun (A large serpent by the name of Quetzocoatl (Pr | ||||
| EQ Item | Cool name | REDACTED | Dec 12th, 2002 | Excellent |
| My only thoughts are that it is a cool usage of the name corruption, guessing that this probably drops off a huge thunder serpent. I personally see no problem with using real world mythology, since when they use Elves, Dwarves etc, I might add that they were originated in real world mythology, and | ||||
Contact: Private Message
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC