EQ Quest |
RE: Mercenery Assignments |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Decent |
|
I searched all over SS to see who gets the Assignments and I came to the conclusion that the quest is no longer active 8(
I asked the memebrs of my Gauild and our Alliance if they knew and all said you give them to the SEntry at the Gate to WL.
I will pop over and try again to see if the patch |
EQ Item |
RE: Enchanter Legs |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Default |
|
the ac on these isn't going to do jack for enchanters, 10ac is like nothing,( they will still die in like 1-2 rounds) if you ask me these have mnk/bst all over em.. |
EQ Item |
NO! |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Sub-Default |
|
Ok....holy crap, if any ranger, beastlord, or bard is above 17, warrior and rogue above 13, or monk....never monk since they get dual wield at lvl 1 ever wants or thinks they should use a shield ever, i mean under any circumstances, they are so sorely and pathetically wrong, go ahead and try and arg |
EQ Item |
RE: using shields for rangers |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Good |
|
Aye, there is a worn atk cap of 250, sorry for the confusion. Its possible they may equip an uber shield but then again I doubt it. SoE still has not fixed LoS bugs, so rangers still need to do their damage to a walled mob or a short one up close and personal. A sheild would only hurt melee dps in t |
EQ Item |
RE: Only scribable... |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Good |
|
Then it's been changed. It used to be any Druid or Cleric could imbue a plains pebble. Maybe that was an oversight that's been fixed. It was the ONLY "non-denomonational" imbue there was. |
EQ Item |
drops by fort |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Decent |
|
This cloak drops off a dastardly scoundrel in the huts near the pirate fort in gunthak...he also sees invis.....just invis up and run around all the huts by fort...he'll come to u and is mostly a common spawn..killed him 3 times had the cloak each time..not a bad lower lvl chanter cloak if i do say |
EQ Item |
but..... |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Default |
|
Yeah... but... are the walls still aggro dangerous, etc? for those of us who are still on regular servers - might be kinda nice to know if the aggro rules are still gonna be the same as the old PoHate |
EQ Item |
drool |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Default |
|
uber /drool |
EQ Item |
RE: Tae Ew Two Hand Sword |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Decent |
|
It has the same graphic as the Dark Edged Two hander, and the Sombrous greatsword....Big two handed sword with runes going along the hilt and the blade...can also see the graphic on most of the weapon racks in Shar Val |
EQ Item |
Very nice weapon |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Negative |
|
[:YIKES:]
|
EQ Item |
RE: Very nice weapon |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Negative |
|
[:yikes:] |
EQ Item |
RE: Enchanter Legs |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Decent |
|
no way would these go to a mnk. Any guild capable of killing Seru, would have no problem killing AoW, and any monk who would wear these over the flayed barbarian hide leggings would be just a little bit insane. i could see beastlord though |
EQ Item |
RE: you are a bit mistaken, Eternal. |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Decent |
|
Ultravision with my gamma up appears as daylight all the time. |
EQ Item |
um |
REDACTED |
Apr 17th, 2003 |
Default |
|
ac5, hp20 and they put a reccomended level on it wtf? is the new rule every single item gets a reccomended level?? |
EQ Item |
RE: works now |
REDACTED |
Apr 18th, 2003 |
Excellent |
|
Yes you are certainly correct about the first sweet spot.
It actually goes:
21475pp AC16 STA32 MANA93 SVM21 (I weigh 573stone)
then works its way down to:
42950pp No stats (21475+21475)
Then back up to:
64425pp AC16 STA32 MANA93 SVM21 (21475+21475+21475)
Was still following this trend at 6442 |
EQ Item |
*giggle* |
REDACTED |
Apr 18th, 2003 |
Default |
|
Makes you wonder if the devs on this game were stoners... dry eye weed.... hmmmmmmmm
Could just be ragweed, but you never know.....
Kortap Windyroad
Halfling Preserver of Karana
Xev |
EQ Item |
50?!? |
REDACTED |
Apr 18th, 2003 |
Excellent |
|
What is SoE smoking these days. Their recommended levels are almost always 20 levels too high, or more. |
EQ Item |
stats |
REDACTED |
Apr 18th, 2003 |
Good |
|
This item only gave me Wis: +4 Int: +4 Magic Resist: +9 HP: +9 Mana: +9 and no spell haste II with all my specializes at 50 and one at 200, once I got the last casting skill (divination) to 235 I got the full stats (Wis: +5 Int: +5 Magic Resist: +10 HP: +10 Mana: +10)and spell haste II , so appears |
EQ Item |
Hmmm |
REDACTED |
Apr 18th, 2003 |
Decent |
|
Only thing I can see with these are the saves. Ah well, some iksar might need it :P |
EQ Item |
Jagged Pine Forest |
REDACTED |
Apr 18th, 2003 |
Decent |
|
This item is also found on A Cave Basilisk and A Cave Basilisk Genetor in the caves where the gnoll banker is. |
EQ Item |
Dmg/Dly wrong |
REDACTED |
Apr 18th, 2003 |
Default |
|
Its other way around...Dmg 36 dly 33! |
EQ Item |
Questions |
REDACTED |
Apr 18th, 2003 |
Decent |
|
Does this pottery item have to be made in the Tanaan only wheel and kiln? Or will any wheel and kiln do?
Also, what levels have any of you successfully done this combine with?
Thanks |
EQ Item |
RE: Enchanter Legs |
REDACTED |
Apr 18th, 2003 |
Default |
|
As a level 65 chanter myself, i think id rather let a melee have these.... |
EQ Item |
Nice weapon |
REDACTED |
Apr 18th, 2003 |
Decent |
|
Probably not the highest DPS weapon but 15 STA 100 HP makes this a good weapon for the defensive tank in an xp group, plus add in your shield's stats. |
EQ Item |
RE: um |
REDACTED |
Apr 18th, 2003 |
Default |
|
Should be recommended level 5 if anything. |