EQ Item |
.... |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
good.. but not great. even though a high level with maxxed int would use this.. they would probably rather use something with +hp and +mana. but the saves aren't too bad, same w/ ac. moderate item, i would say. will be worth a few 1000pp in a few months maybe, when people start farming =) |
EQ Item |
Same as |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Same as Crystalized Shadow Scimitar without the stats...yay... |
EQ Item |
not bad |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Sub-Default |
|
i'd take one of these for the effect. won't be worth too much, as melee's don't need the +hp +mana as much as pure casters do. decent item |
EQ Item |
cool |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
hey this seems kinda cool, this kin of bonus might make up for the uber amout of prenerf weapoins people have foudn so far..things that coudl make up for, maybe say, bind wound or swimming woudl be awesome too...for example..mana driven fan engine..increases swimming skill by 30%??soudn good to anyo |
EQ Item |
ewww |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
"soiled" pant items.. very gross lol |
EQ Item |
RE: druids... |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Good |
|
The damage/delay is not better than the warrior epic. The warrior epic is 14/24, this is 12/24. The "Dmg Bonus: 11" refers to the user's innate damage bonus; the same player would have the same bonus of 11 on the warrior epic.
Even against Undead, it's only 13/24. And the Wis does |
EQ Item |
good |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
gooood range item. stats are great, not to mention the 15svMagic! very good range rseist item |
EQ Item |
good |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
great item for casters w/ 200 int or wis. great mana and hp.. the saves are also nice, for various things |
EQ Item |
Poachers |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
I had several of these drop last nite. There are 3 different types all with different stats all only useable by Mnk and Bst. They dropped off of the Poachers. The poachers were all concentrated in a round room in the tunnels. They were easy to kill at lvl 35 I am guessing they are around lvl 20ish. |
EQ Item |
RE: Either Melee |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Good |
|
Young man, you misinterpret my rant...
I'm not bashin ye because ya desire this spear, since it is a right decent weapon.
I'm not even bashin ye for havin a Harpoon of the Depths and an Orc Impaler (myself at lvl 30, I strolled into Frontier Mnts and SWORE I was the sh*t with my 6/22 SSoM main |
EQ Item |
Wrong |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Sub-Default |
|
Ratio: 2.833
Dats not right for 12 / 34 weapon.
|
EQ Item |
Sectoid? |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Sectoids? The things from the strategy game X-COM? I am laughing. |
EQ Item |
RE: Wrong |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Actually i believe it is ... divide 34 by 12 on a calculator and 2.833... should pop up :) |
EQ Item |
RE: Chanterlicious |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Good |
|
Yup yup, these be some rockin sleeves for a chanter with some int to spare ... every stat provided is very worthwhile for them to have. Especially the AC / Cha / HP & Mana :)
Mind ya, every class that can wear these can benefit greatly from them ... so best of luck to all int casters who get |
EQ Item |
Underconned |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
This guy isn't easy to do solo. I took him at 55 but couldn't get a single snare or root to land on him. He's pretty fast so I had to run quite a ways and then nuke. He was hitting in the 60s. He also partially resisted all but one or two nukes, usually resisted over half the damage. He aggro'd |
EQ Item |
RE: Right Graphic |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
i know for a FACT that the owlbears, at least the defenders DO summon. repeatedly. screech also, but definitely summon. |
EQ Item |
Not bad at all...... |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Good |
|
nt
[i][sm]Edited, Dec 16th 2006 2:10am by Aldius[/sm][/i] |
EQ Item |
Let the wookies win |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Clearly druids have use for this; at this level, though, their sub-epic elaborate scimitar is competitive to say the least, and there are tons of good other options for +wis primary-hand items.
The +11 bonus is irrelevant; you would get the same bonus no matter what 1hs you put in your hand, and |
EQ Item |
uhhhh |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
The Shissar are part snake and they don't have feet. Why do they have boots? |
EQ Item |
best droppable ring? |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Easily one of the best droppable rings out there for wis/int casters and even hybrids. At the high end game you are looking for AC, mana, resists, and HP (not necessarily in that order). With the upgraded Chardok, Ring of Di'Zok and the quest rings from there were some of the best rings available, |
EQ Item |
No price? |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
How can there be no pricing data on a vendor item? |
EQ Item |
RE: Hmm |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Good |
|
Yeah, you'd be silly not to have *ALL* your weapons skills maxxed out, 'cuz you never know when something nice will come along. You only have to use that 2HB, whatever, long enough to max it out at this level if you don't want to keep using it. Then work on another skill or go back to what you pre |
EQ Item |
RE: Dammit! |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
Not to mention that SK's can't use it anyway... |
EQ Item |
RE: masks |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Decent |
|
Good thing too, shadowmen should not be dropping loot that sells for 475pp to vendors. They are a mid level mob that should not be dropping valuable loot. You'd prefer everyone farming these? There'd be nothing left of the player economy. Need cash? farm shadowmen for a couple of days and walk off w |
EQ Quest |
Broken |
REDACTED |
Dec 8th, 2001 |
Default |
|
ok I recently did these and step #4 is broken as of December 7, 2001. I handed him in that order a Gnoll Fang, Snake Fang and Hunting Bow not once not twice but 3 times....so just to let everyone know beware that part....hell just to see if I had to do them in order I destroyed all my old Field Pri |