I think getting rid of all ammo is a bad idea. It defeats realism of the game. I could aslo care less that they made the stacks bigger; stacks of 200 is enough. Who uses 4000 arrows in a raid anyway?

I am opposed to this on several levels. first as a LW, quivers are something I can make and make a little money on. 2nd I like the ability to choose different ammo for what im doing. For farming i use the cheap stuff, for instances/raids i use the highest quality i can. Having an ammo bag is part and parcel of being a hunter.

Hunters out there?? How about engineers! Right now I'm selling mammoth cutters for 6-8g for 200 bullets. And I can make 2000 bullets for a couple of saronite bars.. I don't hope they remove the ammunition because this is the only damn item I can use to make some money out of my ****** profession, engineering!

i really dont like the idea it takes away from the realism and planning aspects of the game.

I dislike the idea of endless ammo and doing away with ammo pouches for many reasons but the biggest is realism. I have run out of ammo more than once and thought that it serve me right. Also, warriors use bows and guns too, not just hunters, so a separate bag for their ammo seems very appropriate.
The space constraints on the hunter are a very real problem. But I have almost as much problem with my pets food as I do ammo. So I suggest a hunter's pouch (to be made by leatherworkers). It would hold petfood (made by the hunter from mats normally consumed by his particular pet and learned from the pet trainers)and ammo (in stacks of 500 not 200).
The ammo change would save a great deal of space and would be a easy update to the existing recipes. You would not even have to change the amounts of mats to create them, just the end quantity.
The petfood idea would allow hunters to create a food from five of this, two of that, and three of those, into one food for his pet, stackable in quantities of 20 or even up to 50 thus consolidating space. Different levels could have different recipes and specific recipes could add twinks to the pet at higher levels. Only the same levels of foods would be allowed to be used in the recipes thus preserving the food level benefits we now have in place for our pets.
This also forces the hunter into deciding what will be food for his pet and what he will cook for himself, adding to drama and strategy of play(though admittedly not realism, hunters do usually feed their pets from their own larder).

i like the idea, im just kinda bummed i spent so much money on my 28 slot quiver.

As Scubashark said about the soulshards. I never used a soulbag. Never saw the bennifit of it as you can carry shards in regular bags and no reason to carry so many. You can make them practically anywhere when you need them so i never saw a henderance there. For ammunition again no real reason to carry a quiver/pouch except that the bag itself actually gives a bonus to haste henceforth usefulness. Getting rid of the haste of them and putting it in some other function is a great idea and frees up that bag space everyone else has. Good going Blizzard. As for the ammo i have long wished that they would do something along the lines of endless quiver in Everquest in WOW. It was very nice to be rid of carry so much ammo around and spending so much money on ammo. Yes i know this isn't everquest and i am glad i no longer play that game. Either way it is both great changes! As for LW loosing money on quiver/pouch well it shouldn't hurt that bad you have many avenues of money making. As for engineers loseing a big income from ammo. I do partially agree that it is messed up there only because so much of enineering is bop stuff or only usable by other engineers of appropriate skill level which means they should make it themselves anyway. I have always thought that engineering needed some serious changes in that as almost all things produced by engineers is only usable by them. WOW should address that. Don't make the prolem in loosing money though cause of ammo profit loss many ways to make money other than that in game. Do demand that they do something with the tradeskill though that needs attention.

The extra bag space will be much appreciated, but the whole idea of a hunter without a quiver is kind of....weird. Perhaps the quiver could be a sort of 'bag inside of a bag', where the quiver still gets filled with arrows, but the quiver then goes into a bag itself? But that would 'look' even sillier I suppose, reaching inside a bag to pull out an arrow, vs the traditional 'over the shoulder, lock and load' routine.

Perhaps I'll just settle for a gatling gun, with bullet casing straps strewn about my shoulders, we have 'hogs afterall now.

I'm happy about the change, but curious how Blizz is going to implement the haste bonus granted from Quiver/Pouches to us Hunters. The ammo change in general is a nice touch, because with ranged attack being our primary function, we've always been pigeonholed into either 1) Buying expensive ammunition in large quantites, 2) Being restricted to Engineering to make our own ammo, or 3) letting our DPS suffer through use of vendor bought ammo.

This will be good in that Hunters will be more apt to explore other avenues of crafting with ease and less concern for actually being about to come up with Ammo on a regular basis. On top of this, it free's up 16-22 inventory spaces (full bag slot), which is something that's sorely missed when farming/grinding/etc.