Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

SoFollow

#1 Jan 31 2011 at 12:01 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,564 posts
Is TPO gone for good now? This place is going to slow way down if that's the case. Smiley: lol

Also, Kirby, why did you make it protected (I saw you mention this in another thread)?
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#2 Jan 31 2011 at 12:55 AM Rating: Excellent
-REDACTED-
Guru
****
4,759 posts
For the epic trolling one would guess. It keeps admins out of your journal too. Although they have ways around it.
#3 Jan 31 2011 at 1:03 AM Rating: Excellent
Scholar
**
291 posts
If varus can come back from so many bans, I would assume that they would let rog back eventually, although that sock probably hurt his chances.
____________________________
Jim Jones wrote:
I think a healthy person has to think through his death, or he may sell out.
#4 Jan 31 2011 at 1:59 AM Rating: Excellent
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Alzade wrote:
If varus can come back from so many bans
That's the only part that really kinda bugs me, personally. I mean, if they feel he was out of line and needed a banning, then so be it. I can't comment on that. Their house, their rules. But the fact that varus consistently comes back(sometimes within a very short period of time) after not just flaming but hateful racist **** has always bugged me.

Whatever. I'm going to stay out of this ****. I'm too angry about other crap as it is to allow myself to think about this too hard.

In other news...Capitalism ho, ************** Smiley: motz
#5 Jan 31 2011 at 2:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Alzade wrote:
If varus can come back from so many bans, I would assume that they would let rog back eventually, although that sock probably hurt his chances.
I'm to relay to Roger, from Kao, that immediately making a sock after the ban, and spamming 250+ posts 'did not help the situation.'
#6 Jan 31 2011 at 2:22 AM Rating: Excellent
-REDACTED-
Guru
****
4,759 posts
Really though the admin decisions need more consistency, if varus can come back repeatedly after his bans, the same should go for Rog. Atleast as far as I am concerned but I think some Admins need to be less partial, they are admins not forum users and should act for the company they work for as employees not for their own interests. That's just my two cents.

That being said coming back immediately after a ban is a bad idea, but a precedent had been set for it previously with Varus.
#7 Jan 31 2011 at 8:46 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
They let RCD back, too, didn't they?
#8 Jan 31 2011 at 9:17 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
#9 Jan 31 2011 at 9:33 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Used to be rdmdontdie. Is now rdmcandie. Pretty sure he was b& and not just a namechange.
#10 Jan 31 2011 at 11:17 AM Rating: Good
Citizen's Arrest!
******
29,527 posts
Ah, that annoying jackass?
#11 Jan 31 2011 at 4:33 PM Rating: Good
The One and Only Poldaran wrote:
Ah, that annoying jackass?
He's not bad in the FFXI-y type stuff. Definitely comes off as extremely smug in the oot and asylum.
#12 Jan 31 2011 at 6:25 PM Rating: Good
Scholar
**
291 posts
Lubriderm the Fussy wrote:
Definitely comes off as extremely smug in the oot and asylum.
It would be ok if he knew a thing about politics, economics, drug policy, or anything really. That's not the case, however. He tried to argue that the reason cannabis is illegal is that it doesn't require processing or refinement to be used as a drug so therefore the government wouldn't be able to regulate it as a good. That's when I stopped reading his posts.
____________________________
Jim Jones wrote:
I think a healthy person has to think through his death, or he may sell out.
#13 Jan 31 2011 at 8:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Manosuke the Irrelevant wrote:
Really though the admin decisions need more consistency, if varus can come back repeatedly after his bans, the same should go for Rog. Atleast as far as I am concerned but I think some Admins need to be less partial, they are admins not forum users and should act for the company they work for as employees not for their own interests. That's just my two cents.

That being said coming back immediately after a ban is a bad idea, but a precedent had been set for it previously with Varus.


Thats one of those areas that gives admins headaches. The asylum remains a special case in terms of rules of what is taboo. If Varus posted anywhere else in the site, ever, he would be gone permanently. We actually had an unprescedented vote in the Asylum over whether we should remove him permanently or allow him to make new accounts, and the end majority was actually 3/4ths for keeping him around in some form just because he's so far out of the realm of sane that he livens the place up a bit. The asylum has been picking up a bit recently, but for all intents and purposes it has too small a population to be terribly picky about posters anymore. The other odd thing about that is that many times, he doesn't get banned, he just changes username when he drops down too far below the filter to where he can't see his own posts. Yes, it is a precedent, no it doesn't necessarily apply to the rest of the forum simply because the content ruleset for Asylum is different. There, flaming is allowed and encouraged, as are most topics of dicussion we wouldn't allow in the rest of the forum.

Spoonless the Silent wrote:
Used to be rdmdontdie. Is now rdmcandie. Pretty sure he was b& and not just a namechange.


RDMdontdie was banned for going off on a spam tirade against the site over what he thought at the time was a virus infection he believed at the time to have been loaded from the site. Things were said by him at the time that were really less than polite, and I didn't really care for some of the names. It later turned out that the infection came from a completely different site. Approximatly 1 year later he appologized and asked for a second chance. He is currently operating under the famous "one strike and you are one again forever" policy, and he was not allowed to retain his prior post count.

I am aware there was friction between TPO/ROG and several of the FFXI admins. That didn't play a factor in the decision to issue a ban. If anything, it delayed the decision on my part because we were making allowances for that very issue. I'm not going to really get into detail on that though. The final decision on a ban was due almost entirly to the direct "If you do this action again in the FFXI forum which is against rule X and you have been previously warned over repeatedly, you will be banned, you have no more chances" ultimatum I issued, and then his doing said action again. For what its worth, I was for the last year prior to the ban the only admin who was arguing that we should keep him around despite the moderating overhead he caused. It wasn't some spur of the moment decision, it wasn't something personally motivated. It was a line, and a choice to cross that line on his part.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#14 Jan 31 2011 at 10:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
16,960 posts
I'm not aware of all that went on with Rog and his warnings. I don't like that he was banned, but I can't do anything about it.

What I didn't like, Kaolian, was you pointing it out in my journal, for "all" to see. A PM would have sufficed for the second ban.

I will admit that I overreacted a bit when I set my journal to Protected, but you pissed me off at the time, and it seemed like a way to get back at you.

Edited, Jan 31st 2011 9:44pm by Kirby
____________________________
MyAnimeList FFXIV Krystal Spoonless
#15 Feb 01 2011 at 7:29 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,251 posts
Thanks for being open about this stuff, Kao.
#16 Feb 01 2011 at 10:57 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,564 posts
I really don't understand why people get warned not to do certain things by an admin and then do it anyway. You'd think they'd have figured out by now that Kao will ban you faster than you can say "I'll just change my IP". Smiley: lol
____________________________
◕ ‿‿ ◕
#17 Feb 01 2011 at 3:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Spoonless the Silent wrote:
Thanks for being open about this stuff, Kao.
Aye. Open and proactively informative. I wonder, Kao, if in a week or so, if a rog mule showed up, and didn't rack up hundreds of posts in the first few days, and steered far clear of =10 (or any in the XI genre) for a while, if it would go under the radar.
#18 Feb 01 2011 at 6:49 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,251 posts
Lubriderm the Fussy wrote:
Spoonless the Silent wrote:
Thanks for being open about this stuff, Kao.
Aye. Open and proactively informative. I wonder, Kao, if in a week or so, if a rog mule showed up, and didn't rack up hundreds of posts in the first few days, and steered far clear of =10 (or any in the XI genre) for a while, if it would go under the radar.
Oh, I'm sure it's going to take longer than a week. Probably at least a month or two, plus a written apology from rog to the admins (I have doubts whether he could choke that down) for it to be considered.
#19 Feb 01 2011 at 7:41 PM Rating: Excellent
-REDACTED-
Guru
****
4,759 posts
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
It wasn't some spur of the moment decision, it wasn't something personally motivated. It was a line, and a choice to cross that line on his part.

I should have been a bit more specific there are really only one maybe two admins I know of that I think tend to be a bit too personally involved in some of their actions, mostly in their dealings with people or their expression of their opinions. As a moderator or an admin I personally think you are sort of waving your right to posting controversial (apart from maybe trying to start a discussion on the topic or guiding it slightly without taking a side) or participating in some of the more heated discussions (read: Arguments), atleast that is how I see an Admin or moderator functioning. Really I have no major issues with anyone really, least of all you Kao, most my dealings on any official admin business have been pleasant and handled fairly easily.
#20 Feb 02 2011 at 12:43 PM Rating: Excellent
Spoonless the Silent wrote:
Lubriderm the Fussy wrote:
Spoonless the Silent wrote:
Thanks for being open about this stuff, Kao.
Aye. Open and proactively informative. I wonder, Kao, if in a week or so, if a rog mule showed up, and didn't rack up hundreds of posts in the first few days, and steered far clear of =10 (or any in the XI genre) for a while, if it would go under the radar.
Oh, I'm sure it's going to take longer than a week. Probably at least a month or two, plus a written apology from rog to the admins (I have doubts whether he could choke that down) for it to be considered.
"A few months" was what was told to me, however, no restrictions or apologies were needed. I was just hoping for a "Rog Lite" version in the meantime.

Manosuke the Irrelevant wrote:
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
It wasn't some spur of the moment decision, it wasn't something personally motivated. It was a line, and a choice to cross that line on his part.

I should have been a bit more specific there are really only one maybe two admins I know of that I think tend to be a bit too personally involved in some of their actions, mostly in their dealings with people or their expression of their opinions. As a moderator or an admin I personally think you are sort of waving your right to posting controversial (apart from maybe trying to start a discussion on the topic or guiding it slightly without taking a side) or participating in some of the more heated discussions (read: Arguments), atleast that is how I see an Admin or moderator functioning. Really I have no major issues with anyone really, least of all you Kao, most my dealings on any official admin business have been pleasant and handled fairly easily.
I completely agree with this statement. Personally, I was more put off about the fact that Pikko said that =10 was 'ruined' and not that Rog was the one that ruined it (though I disagree with the assertion that Rog ruined anything). I don't think =10 is any worse than it was, nor any worse any other FFXI forum. I don't consider it 'ruined,' and if anything, Rog contributed much more than he disrupted.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 9 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (9)