**** it... :: Free Realms

Quote Reply

#27 Jan 24 2011 at 6:13 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1612743408497

View User Forum

29,185 posts

Manosuke the Irrelevant wrote:

Grand Master Leatherworker ThePsychoticO wrote:

Manosuke the Irrelevant wrote:

Spoonless the Silent wrote:

worthless.

you could have at least posted this sh*thole of a thread in the OOT so we could all get rateups, cockface.

You would have got rate ups, I would have got rate downs just like my 2k ding.

So? People with 550 posts outside of journals don't deserve guru.

Apparently Quality is greater than Quantity, because if post count alone determined your rank you would be guru, but instead you're sort of bounving between scholar and sub

Actually getting rated up a lot on your first posts is more important. Hence why it's unfair for people with low post counts to have guru: since they didn't @#%^ing earn it. This is why i rate down all gurus with under 500-1k posts. If they actually deserve guru, then they'll keep it anyway, if not, it's easier to take it sooner rather than latr.

Edited, Jan 24th 2011 7:14pm by ThePsychoticOne

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#28 Jan 24 2011 at 6:23 PM Rating: Good

-REDACTED-

Guru

4,759 posts

Grand Master Leatherworker ThePsychoticO wrote:

Manosuke the Irrelevant wrote:

Grand Master Leatherworker ThePsychoticO wrote:

Manosuke the Irrelevant wrote:

Spoonless the Silent wrote:

worthless.

you could have at least posted this sh*thole of a thread in the OOT so we could all get rateups, cockface.

You would have got rate ups, I would have got rate downs just like my 2k ding.

So? People with 550 posts outside of journals don't deserve guru.

Apparently Quality is greater than Quantity, because if post count alone determined your rank you would be guru, but instead you're sort of bounving between scholar and sub

Actually getting rated up a lot on your first posts is more important. Hence why it's unfair for people with low post counts to have guru: since they didn't @#%^ing earn it. This is why i rate down all gurus with under 500-1k posts. If they actually deserve guru, then they'll keep it anyway, if not, it's easier to take it sooner rather than latr.

Edited, Jan 24th 2011 7:14pm by ThePsychoticOne

Rating people up or down because of their rank is a pretty asshat move, I only ever rate on post content, and or intelligence level displayed by the poster. Then again you are Rog so being an asshat is pretty much expected.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#29 Jan 24 2011 at 6:25 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1612743408497

View User Forum

29,185 posts

When i see something wrong, i aim to correct it.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#30 Jan 24 2011 at 6:31 PM Rating: Good

-REDACTED-

Guru

4,759 posts

Obviously if the low post guru's posts are all useful constructive and written in a manner that is well recieved by the general populace they did earn guru, and nothing is wrong. Or in my case they are thoroughly sarcastic at the right times in addition to the above.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#31 Jan 24 2011 at 6:32 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1612743408497

View User Forum

29,185 posts

Or maybe their first few posts happened to get rated up, and no one cared to rate them down after that. It doesn't take much to get guru right away. If they deserved it, then they'll be rated up more than enough to offset any people rating them down solely because they are a low post count guru, and if not, then they'll lose it, which is fine, since they must not have deserved it in the first place.

Edited, Jan 24th 2011 7:33pm by ThePsychoticOne

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#32 Jan 24 2011 at 6:37 PM Rating: Decent

-REDACTED-

Guru

4,759 posts

So why not just read their post and rate it on content instead of just blanket red arrowing anyone less that 1000 posts with a red name? Also just my opinion but some of those low post gurus deserve the red name far more than some of the 10k+ gurus but that is a matter of opinion.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#33 Jan 24 2011 at 6:37 PM Rating: Excellent

Kirby

View User Forum

Dear Diary

16,960 posts

I deserve Guru.

____________________________

MyAnimeList FFXIV Krystal Spoonless

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#34 Jan 24 2011 at 6:39 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1612743408497

View User Forum

29,185 posts

Manosuke the Irrelevant wrote:

So why not just read their post and rate it on content instead of just blanket red arrowing anyone less that 1000 posts with a red name?

That would never work. If i rate them up a few times before realizing for sure they don't deserve guru, it'll be that much harder to take it from them.

Quote:

Also just my opinion but some of those low post gurus deserve the red name far more than some of the 10k+ gurus but that is a matter of opinion.

Why is why we need to rate them down in the first place, so they don't end up getting locked into guru later on, but are still close enough to earn it, if they actually deserve it.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#35 Jan 24 2011 at 6:39 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1612743408497

View User Forum

29,185 posts

Kirby, Star Breaker wrote:

I deserve Guru.

Ehhh...

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#36 Jan 24 2011 at 6:48 PM Rating: Good