Please halpFollow
Well, at least you didn't page claim.
-REDACTED-
Guru
4,759 posts
Of course not my pages are 100 posts long.
You're lame? Oh, ok.
-REDACTED-
Guru
4,759 posts
Kirby the Eccentric wrote:
You're lameinternet doesn't suck balls? Oh, ok.
I fail to see how that was relevant.
-REDACTED-
Guru
4,759 posts
Well if my internet doesn't suck it takes the same amount of time to load 100 posts as it does 50 (or roughly no time at all). So in reality it just cuts down on browsing between pages. If your intertubes weren't clogged with stuff you could do the same.
I just don't see the point in loading 100 posts per page. Either I follow a thread, or I just look at the OP and the last post.
-REDACTED-
Guru
4,759 posts
Yah but what if you come to a thread you wanna follow 75 posts in? Huh what then. 100 posts per page is far more efficient if your internet isn't to ****** to load a couple images and 100 sentences in one or two seconds.
Manosuke, ****** Superhero wrote:
Yah but what if you come to a thread you wanna follow 75 posts in? Huh what then. 100 posts per page is far more efficient if your internet isn't to sh*tty to load a couple images and 100 sentences in one or two seconds.
He takes an extra 2 seconds to click next page?
-REDACTED-
Guru
4,759 posts
It takes time to resolve the IP and URLs with DNS servers... far faster and more efficient to do so once than twice.
Manosuke, ****** Superhero wrote:
It takes time to resolve the IP and URLs with DNS servers... far faster and more efficient to do so once than twice.
So you save that .5 sec it takes to load the page? Got it.
If you say so.
-REDACTED-
Guru
4,759 posts
Well I did say so. Over several hundred page views it will reduce bandwidth usage and save several seconds of time... I mean you played RDM you should be familiar with marginal benefits adding up over time.
Manosuke, ****** Superhero wrote:
I mean you played RDM you should be familiar with marginal benefits adding up over time.
50 posts per page.
50 PPP.
PIMP PALADIN POWERLEVEL.
50 PPP.
PIMP PALADIN POWERLEVEL.
-REDACTED-
Guru
4,759 posts
I dunno you were definitely a better PL on RDM/PLD than on PLD alone. Something to do with Refresh, Auto-Refresh and Vert.
Chivalry was pretty much Convert, if you had me tanking D:
It was more Paladin like, saving noobs from imminent death.
It was more Paladin like, saving noobs from imminent death.
-REDACTED-
Guru
4,759 posts
Yah but as a dual boxed PL with me nuking/pulling on SCH and you curing and tanking like 800 mobs at once it was easier to swing with RDM.
I tanked 800 mobs at once? Impressive.
-REDACTED-
Guru
4,759 posts
Yah but it hardly counts in Valkurm or Qufim
You were parting in Valkurm? Lameness.
-REDACTED-
Guru
4,759 posts
Well when you were PLing in Valkurm it was usually just Dori and I, or rarely Envy and I
Still lame.
Recent Visitors: 51
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (51)
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC