Kuwoobie wrote:
So. Aside from starting a third world war, what are some other options?
There are various means of redistributing wealth from wealthy to poor if that's what you're after. Outcomes are generally inefficient, but they can increase the welfare of the common person. They're also potentially detrimental if they're too heavy-handed in the approach. We've tended to avoid those methods in the U.S. for various reasons, some of which have merit, and some of which are rather stupid.
In the end though, methods like wealth re-distribution don't address the root cause of the problem: that the country simply has to share the pie with more people these days. There's no way around that without either increasing the size of the pie (for example through new technologies), or by killing off your competitors so that there's more pie for you. The world only can support so many people, and historically (think like over the past 10,000 years or so) people have used the majority of their waking hours focusing on their survival. In more recent times (say the past couple hundred years) technology has given us breathing room to be able to afford to do other things besides barely scraping by. However as the world's consumption catches up with the resource potential again we'll increasingly be left with less free time and money as a result.
As a non-WWII example of this in action, those that survived the black death in Europe got to experience many years of plenty, and had an improved diet and lower mortality.
Linky. Kuwoobie wrote:
How might things be different today if WWII never happened?
Who knows?
To make an educated guess the U.S. would probably have slowly continued to try and crawl out of the great depression through the 40's. We would have never been "the greatest country in the world" for a time, and at some point we'd probably be in a fairly similar situation to where we find ourselves now, but likely with a smaller amount of material wealth having been accumulated over the last 70 years or so. It's likely we would have never seen a strong middle-class grow and then slowly start to die away. It's not like the U.S. is a terrible place or anything in this scenario, but certainly not as wealthy or strong as it is otherwise. Remember the wealth concentration we see in this country is closer to historical norms than it has been for quite some time. Much of the late 1800's and early 20th century had a similar amount of wealth concentrated in the hands of the wealthy. Not that this is necessarily an ideal situation, of course, but we're not in uncharted territory here either.
Clicky thingy Honestly we'd probably be better off if we just admitted to ourselves that the post-WWII boom was an anomaly, and we shouldn't expect to see a situation like that again; at least without going through a similar global crisis.
Edited, Aug 8th 2016 3:49pm by someproteinguy