TirithRR wrote:
Ignoring the issues, calling them irrelevant, and focusing instead on categorizing everyone who disagrees with them as pro-murder/rape/threats/misogyny.
The Article breaks down all the issues on every side of Gamergate.
It says pretty much exactly what I've been saying in this entire thread - that because of the very loud actions of a few, the movement is more defined by the misogyny that started the movement than the ethics in video game journalism issues that it has since tried to pivot to. Because of that, I don't really feel they're wrong in saying while those issues are interesting, they're ultimately irrelevant due to the crazy taking center stage.
And at no point in the article do they paint anyone that disagrees with them in the pro-murder/rape/threats/misogyny camp.
Did we read the same thing, are you projecting, or am I missing something else?
____________________________
"The Rich are there to take all of the money & pay none of the taxes, the middle class is there to do all the work and pay all the taxes, and the poor are there to scare the crap out of the middle class." -George Carlin