Gbaji wrote:
And the one above that demanded "proof". Since that was the original question you asked, and to which you have repeatedly demanded an answer, that's the reason I haven't answered it.
Cut the crap. I re-asked the question several times in which you QUOTED. Your responses quoted my clarified questions, not the original. Furthermore, you went so far to argue the definition of "speculation", based on my response of quoting you, which contradicted your claim. So, either you didn't read the own text that you responded to and/or you simply ignored it.
Gbaji wrote:
Now if you want facts, which constitute "evidence" of my speculation, how about the following. Let's remember that we're assessing the relative likelihood that Martin was afraid of Zimmerman because he thought Zimmerman was a killer/stalker/whatever, or Martin was afraid of Zimmerman because he thought Zimmerman was a law abiding/concerned/whatever citizen who was calling the cops on him:
Let me stop you here before you go too far down the rabbit hole. I'm not concerned on the reason why Martin was scared. Martin being scared that Zimmerman was a cop vs a killer is irrelevant. I'm asking you to provide facts that he was going to support a crime. Being afraid of the police doesn't prove guilt in a future crime. You said yourself that black teens are taught to fear the law and that his own fear killed him. That only supports the claim that he ran out of fear.
Gbaji wrote:
I'm still unsure why you believe this is a requirement for anything though.
You know more about the law than I do, so obviously you know that you can't just make stuff up about a person to suit your argument. As mentioned, I could say that Martin was about to donate his kidney to his dying friend in the hospital or start his first day working in a soup kitchen. Without any facts to back that up, it's meaningless.
Gbaji wrote:
I have never made this speculation.
Gbaji wrote:
The actions of Martin far more match that of someone who was up to no good, was perhaps scoping out the neighborhood or looking for something to vandalize/steal, and then when he realized that he was being watched, he didn't think "there's some creepy guy who might be a murderer", he almost certainly thought "There's a guy who might be part of the neighborhood watch, and he saw me poking around the houses along the road, so I'd better run before he gets a good look at me".
Speculation on my part? Absolutely. But who runs away just because they see someone sitting in a parked car on the side of the road? Not someone innocently walking home from the store.
Speculation on my part? Absolutely. But who runs away just because they see someone sitting in a parked car on the side of the road? Not someone innocently walking home from the store.
If you misspoke, just man up and say it. You said this KNOWING that Martin only had a bag of skittles. With that knowledge, it is only reasonable that Martin ran out of fear, regardless if he thought Zimmerman was a killer or a cop. I'm not going to get side tracked with your other claims.
So, let me rephrase it again for you. What facts do you have to support your speculation that he was "looking for something to vandalize/steal" and "Not someone innocently walking home from the store"?
If your answer is that he ran, then your facts need to support that Martin ran to prevent being arrested/detained/recognized for "looking for something to vandalize/steal" and "Not someone innocently walking home from the store".