Rachel wrote:
Uh...?
Etymology defines references, not who has the authority to validate a label or a definition of a word. Many words are used in several ways, not all of those ways are recognized as true meanings.
Rachel wrote:
Same reason i'm upset with what gbaji said. Same reason i'm upset when someone is called a "*******". Because it very quickly tells me that you don't accept trans people for who they are.
On the contrary. I fully accept a "*******" as a male. 'Tis you who don't accept trans people for who they are by labeling them something that they are not.