Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

New TopicFollow

#1 Nov 06 2012 at 12:27 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
The Maine mural is back in my local headlines today. A few years ago the states Department of Labor was erecting a new building. They commissioned a local artist to paint a mural which depicted..."the value and dignity of workers and their critical role in creating the wealth of the state and nation."

It wasn't such a bad mural. It was large and filled a whole wall. Apparently it anti-corporation though. It was also our then newly elected Gov. Lepage's first battle against the worker. He ordered the mural removed.

He's governor, he can do that. It was stupid, pointless, it created needless division and served no purpose. Furthermore the battle of the mural is STILL costing tax-payer money. A couple union reps and an artist sued Lepage. Something about squelching free speech. The plaintiffs lost the case but appealed. It's being heard down in Boston today.

I only hope that Mr. Lepage has had some second thoughts about his first actions as governor of our great state of Maine. See the mural and read the story HERE.

In other news my boss is psychotic and I'm feeling the depressive weight of all the cold, dark, drives home from work to come. It's SO hard to muster up any energy in the evenings this time of year.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#2 Nov 06 2012 at 12:33 PM Rating: Good
Tracer Bullet
*****
12,636 posts

So Smash's characterization of Maine politics isn't as exaggerated as I thought.

(I.E. the quaint trivialities of the issues they care about.)



Edited, Nov 6th 2012 12:39pm by trickybeck
#3 Nov 06 2012 at 12:48 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
trickybeck wrote:

So Smash's characterization of Maine politics isn't as exaggerated as I thought.


We had a flash mob yesterday and many of those crazy people doffed their blaze orange. Lucky no one was shot.

YES ON 1
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#4 Nov 06 2012 at 2:18 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
I think the mural should have been removed on the grounds that it's an ugly mural.
#5 Nov 06 2012 at 2:55 PM Rating: Good
The water works building in the city I grew up with had a wonderful relief in cement on the outside wall along the same theme - bunch of workers with axes and shovels and stuff.

Except it was done in a neo-classical style, and they were all naked.

The city never bothered to clean it, so you didn't notice with all the black mold running down the sides of it, until you got up close and studied it, and then saw all the worker men had no pants.
#6 Nov 06 2012 at 4:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Kind of ridiculous suit IMO. The state commissioned a piece of art. They paid the artist for the work. The state is under absolutely zero obligation with regard to what it does with said art once it's done. How the hell does this get past a "wtf are you suing for" stage?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#7 Nov 06 2012 at 8:04 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
gbaji wrote:
Kind of ridiculous suit IMO. The state commissioned a piece of art. They paid the artist for the work. The state is under absolutely zero obligation with regard to what it does with said art once it's done. How the hell does this get past a "wtf are you suing for" stage?
The whole thing is ridiculous IMO.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#8 Nov 07 2012 at 8:42 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Eske Esquire wrote:
I think the mural should have been removed on the grounds that it's an ugly mural.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 201 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (201)