Quote:
"What used to be a size 8 in the 1950s has become a size 4 in the 1970s and a zero in 2006," Krishna said.
The point that Krishna is really making in this article is all about labels.
Quote:
In one experiment, she gave people cookies that were labeled either medium or large, and then measured how much they ate.
The catch? The cookies were identical in size.
What happened? You guessed it. People ate more cookies when they were labeled "medium." Rather than trust what their stomachs were telling them, in other words, people went by the label.
The catch? The cookies were identical in size.
What happened? You guessed it. People ate more cookies when they were labeled "medium." Rather than trust what their stomachs were telling them, in other words, people went by the label.
Are we really gullible enough to fool ourselves with labels or have we simply grown accepting and comfortable with larger sizes in both our clothes and our bags of fries?
Isn't it rather paradoxical that on one hand we claim to despise the unrealistic body image that the fashion industry continues to sell us with anorexic-looking run-way models yet on the other hand we eat up their attempts at making us feel like we're mabye, just a teeny bit like that skinny model because we fit into a size 6 dress (that used to be a size 10)?
Should there be standardized clothes sizes or portion sizes for retail establishments to adhere to (that would mean MORE regulation!)?
Would you be cool living, working and traveling in one of them lounging mobile chairs like the fatties in Wall-E used? I might be ok with that, but I doubt they do very well in the snow.
The brits, always trying to make us Merican's feel inferior (ok, so maybe they don't have to try that hard) have been attempting to tackle the body image issue. This year they initiated the 'Body Confidence' awards
To see what a woman's body supposedly really looks like at various weights and heights and types check out My Body Gallery.
Edited, Sep 26th 2012 3:13pm by Elinda