Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Pre-Debate Election RoundupFollow

#127 Oct 02 2012 at 2:08 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Oh snap.

#128 Oct 02 2012 at 2:14 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I guess it's too late to have him debate with an empty chair on TV.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#129 Oct 02 2012 at 3:59 PM Rating: Good
Sage
****
4,042 posts
#130 Oct 02 2012 at 4:54 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Guenny wrote:


Wow, that guy sounds like a douche (the author).
#131 Oct 02 2012 at 5:19 PM Rating: Decent
Eske Esquire wrote:
Guenny wrote:


Wow, that guy sounds like a douche (the author).

No more than any other college age drunk guy.
#132 Oct 02 2012 at 5:49 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
So will there be a "debate" thread or will it be rolled into this one?
#133 Oct 02 2012 at 5:54 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'll start a thread and live blog the debate until Eske cries.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#134 Oct 02 2012 at 5:59 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Cool.. I'm just waiting.. I know it's sad, but this is my "Super Bowl"... The 2004 debates were priceless lol
#135 Oct 02 2012 at 6:14 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Almalieque wrote:
Cool.. I'm just waiting.. I know it's sad, but this is my "Super Bowl"... The 2004 debates were priceless lol

Haha, that reminds me of Gbaji getting all flustered and worked up because Smash, Nexa and I were bantering about the 2008 Democratic primaries. He also rather famously informs us that there's no question of Clinton's nomination victory Smiley: laugh

So now the question is: Do I watch it on the TV and post from my tablet or watch it on my tablet and post from the computer....? OMG the options!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#136 Oct 02 2012 at 6:24 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
To be fair, I think everyone thought Clinton was going to take it. If I'm not mistaken, she won the popular vote. It was the change in electoral votes that had Obama to win.
#137 Oct 02 2012 at 6:28 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Obama ran the table with a much better delegate game: running her close to a draw in the high population states primary states and blowing her out in the low population caucus states. She won more general population, he won more states and more delegates. also, part of her delegate/population draw came from Michigan and Florida which were ineligible due to breaking the primary rules (I think FL was 50% ineligible... whatever)

But I had it for Obama from early on so nyeah Smiley: tongue

Edited, Oct 2nd 2012 7:30pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#138 Oct 02 2012 at 6:49 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Next time I spend eleventy billion hours in O'hare, you need to roll through...
#139 Oct 02 2012 at 6:53 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Jophiel wrote:
I'll start a thread and live blog the debate until Eske cries.


Smiley: crymore
#140 Oct 02 2012 at 7:08 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
Why isn't there a new thread yet? Smiley: madSmiley: mad
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#141 Oct 02 2012 at 7:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Just start banning people until someone makes a new thread. Usually works.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#142 Oct 02 2012 at 7:48 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'd think that mass bannings would lead to LESS new threads... Smiley: dubious
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#143 Oct 02 2012 at 7:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
well sure, but its less new threads really really quick!
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#144 Oct 02 2012 at 7:58 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
I'll toss out this prediction right now. No matter what happens in the debate itself, the media will describe Obama positively and Romney negatively. Yeah, I'm going for the low hanging fruit on this one, I know.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#145 Oct 02 2012 at 8:02 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'll toss out this prediction right now. Even if Romney comes out drunk on cough syrup, vomits all over himself and takes off his pants while singing the Russian national anthem, Gbaji will say that it was exactly what Romney needed to do and he crushed Obama during the debate.

I, also, am going for the low hanging fruit.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#146 Oct 02 2012 at 8:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
I would take that bet. Everyone expects it to be a blowout. All Romney has to do is keep his foot out of his mouth and he'll come off looking pretty good.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#147 Oct 02 2012 at 8:07 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Honestly I don't think the debates matter at all. I mean look back at 2004 when Bush had the "dear in the head lights" look and he still won. People on both sides are so biased that it doesn't matter how dumb their party's candidate is, they will support him or her enough to win.
#148 Oct 02 2012 at 8:21 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
gbaji wrote:
I'll toss out this prediction right now. No matter what happens in the debate itself, the media will describe Obama positively and Romney negatively. Yeah, I'm going for the low hanging fruit on this one, I know.

If Fox news describes Romney negatively or Obama positively you get 50 rateups.
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#149 Oct 02 2012 at 8:57 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
Fox News isn't "The Media"...

"The Media" is just anything that they don't agree with.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#150 Oct 02 2012 at 9:04 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
7,568 posts
Who is Scott Stapp?
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#151 Oct 02 2012 at 9:07 PM Rating: Good
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
Who is Scott Stapp?


Scott Alan Stapp is an American musician, singer-songwriter, and philanthropist best known as the lead vocalist and lyricist of the rock band Creed, of which he is a founding member. His debut solo album, The Great Divide, was released in 2005.
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 180 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (180)