LBGT TerrorismFollow

Guess if that argument works for gbaji, it'll work for just about anyone.

If you think it'll help you. It hasn't worked yet, but maybe you can succeed where he fails.

I watched this and remembered at some point Alma argued that gay rights & civil rights arguments weren't similar.



After he kindly goes & fucks himself, feel free to carry on.

Edited, Oct 21st 2012 10:27pm by Omegavegeta

"I don't recall any gays being lynched or beaten because they're gay."

Great video there.

I propose this thread gets wrapped inside a capsule and shot up into space. When it reaches 28miles Kao, with one of his many remote control devices, will blow up the capsule. Then when all the letters of all the words start dropping through the atmosphere and reach the speed of sound - we'll hear Alma's voice on the wind.

So do I, you cowardly ******! Much like the abolishment of slavery & the civil rights movement (which in turn spawned the gay rights movement) lead to legalized miscegenation, the abolishment of homosexual persecution & discrimination has lead to the (eventually) gay marriage movement.

Religion isn't an excuse to be a ****, if you don't believe me rewatch the video. Freedom of religion is also freedom from religion, for those of us who aren't ignorant douches.

Edited, Oct 22nd 2012 1:29pm by Omegavegeta

I probably should have included it, because it's funnier that way. He tries to make the point that homosexuals haven't experienced the oppression black have, then realizes how little he knows about homosexual oppression and tries to marginalize any counter examples, then completely forgets why he bothered to marginalize those incidents and goes on to state how he can't think of a single example of a homosexual being lynched, beaten, or denied a job because of their sexuality. To be fair, he probably can't.

Your point was that gays haven't been lynched, beaten, or denied career opportunities due to their sexuality, except that they have but those incidents don't count? How all the rights they want, they already have, but don't?

This is the guy you think best articulates your position?

Edited, Oct 22nd 2012 5:02pm by Allegory

I was not in any denigrating the plight of the ginger, merely pointing out that, you know, a homosexual can marry someone of the opposite sex and still be a homosexual. Just like if someone who is black marries someone who is white is still black. See, we agree. None of these people has any control over that particular trait that we are focusing on, was my point. And the fact that you had become a little more enlightened by pointing this out in your previous post, that was also part of my point.

You really aren't very good at coherent arguments or reading comprehension, are you?

And we have laws protecting them. Not every state protects employees from termination due to sexual orientation. There is also a difference between individual acts of hate and institutionalized persecution. Some putz on the street calling you a ****** and a state prohibiting you from adopting a child due to your sexual orientation are worlds apart.

How convenient for an argument that the two movements are entirely incomparable if you disregard everything similar about them.

So you'll just waste time linking a youtube video about it instead?

Are you doing that thing where you merge everyone who disagrees with you into one borg collective devoid of individuality?

What you would get in alcohol discounts the government would make up with sales tax increases.