Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

NewtFollow

#1 Nov 21 2011 at 5:59 PM Rating: Sub-Default
**
739 posts
I don't think Newt will get the nomination (It's a shame too cause he would tear up Barry in a one on one debate) cause it's always fun and entertaining to hear him speak.

Newt explaining OWS brilliantly

#2 Nov 21 2011 at 6:00 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
I agree with the first three words of this thread.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#3 Nov 21 2011 at 6:06 PM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
I don't suppose "take a pay cut to help fund more jobs, Mr. CEO" factors into OWS at all, amirite?
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#4 Nov 21 2011 at 6:10 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Given that Newt's sole answer in every debate is to throw a little princess fit and cry about the mean ole media for asking such a dumb question, I too think it's a shame that Newt won't win the nomination and get to debate Obama Smiley: smile
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#5 Nov 21 2011 at 6:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
...I got better
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#6 Nov 21 2011 at 6:25 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
Debalic wrote:
...I got better


I'd say that that's going to get old, but I don't think Newt's gonna have the spotlight long enough for it.
#7 Nov 21 2011 at 6:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Eske Esquire wrote:
Debalic wrote:
...I got better


I'd say that that's going to get old, but I don't think Newt's gonna have the spotlight long enough for it.

BURN HIM ANYWAYS!!!
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#8 Nov 21 2011 at 6:45 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,512 posts
Debalic wrote:
...I got better
Goddamnit

I wanted to say that
#9 Nov 21 2011 at 7:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
lulz
Political Wire wrote:
Newt Gingrich had some tough words for the Congressional Budget Office, CNN reports.

Said Gingrich: "The CBO is a reactionary socialist institution which does not believe in economic growth, does not believe in innovation and does not believe in data that it has not internally generated."

Former CBO director Douglas Holtz-Eakin, a Republican, called the allegation "ludicrous."

Said Holtz-Eakin: "I think if you parse that phrase carefully, he got one out of three right. I do agree it is an institution. If you're playing baseball, that's a decent batting average."
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#10 Nov 21 2011 at 9:07 PM Rating: Excellent
Like he really wants to be President. It would cut into his book signings & video hawking time.
#11 Nov 21 2011 at 10:31 PM Rating: Excellent
Honestly, unless the Republicans can pull together and stop bickering, they won't stand a chance against Obama.
#12 Nov 21 2011 at 10:47 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
6,543 posts
IDrownFish wrote:
Honestly, unless the Republicans can pull together and stop bickering, they won't stand a chance against Obama.


It's too bad Arnold Schwarzenegger can't run for the extra lulz.
____________________________
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.

#13 Nov 21 2011 at 10:56 PM Rating: Good
Maybe not this race, but he'll be bahk.
#14 Nov 22 2011 at 6:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Will swallow your soul
******
29,360 posts
Sort of sad the right can't seem to field a viable candidate aside from washed-up actors, and that's a depleted pool, it seems. Ahnold can't run. Fred Thompson has the charisma of a pet rock. Kelsey Grammar has even more baggage than Newt.

And the only candidate that offers a challenge can't get a solid endorsement from the GOP.

If I were a cynic, I'd think the Republicans were playing to lose.
____________________________
In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

#15 Nov 22 2011 at 8:12 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
The left couldn't field a candidate election before last either.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#16 Nov 22 2011 at 8:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Mitt Romney is the GOP John Kerry?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#17 Nov 22 2011 at 2:29 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,512 posts
Samira wrote:
Kelsey Grammar has even more baggage than Newt.

He wouldn't have a chance. One Frasier rerun and Bible Belt homophobia will take care of the rest.
#18 Nov 22 2011 at 6:36 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
6,543 posts
Sweetums wrote:
Samira wrote:
Kelsey Grammar has even more baggage than Newt.

He wouldn't have a chance. One Frasier rerun and Bible Belt homophobia will take care of the rest.


Or Sideshow Bob.
____________________________
Galkaman wrote:
Kuwoobie will die crushed under the burden of his mediocrity.

#19 Nov 22 2011 at 6:49 PM Rating: Good
The only reason Newt wants to be president at this point is that he wants to repeat Clinton's cigar trick with an intern.

Seriously, he was so upset that Clinton got to **** on interns in the privacy of the Oval Office while he was stuck cheating on his wife in an apartment a block away that he threw the greatest impeachment temper tantrum this great nation has ever seen.
#20 Nov 22 2011 at 7:46 PM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
I found that this picture rather apt.
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#21 Nov 22 2011 at 11:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Newt needs to get the nomination for one reason: The potential for political cartoon legends to be born is staggering!
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#22 Nov 23 2011 at 7:25 AM Rating: Excellent
Dread Lörd Kaolian wrote:
Newt needs to get the nomination for one reason: The potential for political cartoon legends to be born is staggering!
You have a good point. Romney is so generic looking. The ed cartoons that featured him in the Boston papers always had to label him.
#23 Nov 23 2011 at 8:35 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Mitt Romney is the GOP John Kerry?
If by January whichever side the challenger is can't find a viable candidate, they should have the option of not running at all and just letting the incumbent continue. Seems ridiculous, and a ridiculous waste of money, to continue a farce like that.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#24 Nov 23 2011 at 8:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
That would sort of defeat the purpose of the primaries Smiley: laugh
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#25 Nov 23 2011 at 8:59 AM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Jophiel wrote:
That would sort of defeat the purpose of the primaries Smiley: laugh

What, the comedic potential?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 257 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (257)