To be fair I'd be surprised if anyone here had a really good understanding of climate-modeling; much less enough knowledge to critically analyze those models and tease out what may or may not be working properly.
Either you believe they're on the right track or not; that the consensus' percentages and probabilities are in-line with reality, that the models are accurate, etc. etc. I'd like to say "prove them wrong" but I don't think anyone here does any simulations of their own anyway. I wouldn't necessarily take it well if someone outside the field tried to tell me how to do Proteomics, much less science in general.
I suppose as much as I'd like to go along with the scientists and trust them here (they are skilled professionals in their fields, and pretty darn intelligent people by the way) if some was to push back, really, I couldn't say I fully understand how they came to their conclusions. We all have to take their word for things in the end, and either you can make that jump in faith or you can't.
Same could be said about any field that requires training or expertise I suppose.
ramble ramble ramble... Edited, Oct 27th 2011 7:35pm by someproteinguy
____________________________
That monster in the mirror, he just might be you. -Grover