Almalieque wrote:
You're making this too easy. There's a difference between being obstinate and being a bigot. Being a bigot consists of you being obstinate. Being obstinate doesn't make you a bigot. Intolerant is on the same level as bigotry. Both words were used in the definition of bigotry but not in discrimination. That's what allow them to be mutually exclusive.
Allegory claimed that bigotry is only acting against something, not for it. I countered his claim with the text you quoted that bigotry isn't one way. You can be bigoted for something as well, i.e. religion, politics and in this situation, homosexuality. That's the key difference between being obstinate vs being intolerable. In either case, they both fall under the word bigotry.
You took that APPLICATION of the word "bigot" and accused me of making it a definition of the word intolerant, while overlooking the word obstinate.
Allegory claimed that bigotry is only acting against something, not for it. I countered his claim with the text you quoted that bigotry isn't one way. You can be bigoted for something as well, i.e. religion, politics and in this situation, homosexuality. That's the key difference between being obstinate vs being intolerable. In either case, they both fall under the word bigotry.
You took that APPLICATION of the word "bigot" and accused me of making it a definition of the word intolerant, while overlooking the word obstinate.
No. See, you're an idiot. This post you made, it's idiotic. There is nothing that you have posted that doesn't make you sound like an idiot.
In closing, you're an idiot.