Allegory wrote:
I don't so much have to tell you how you have used bigot incorrectly as you have to demonstrate how you remotely used it appropriately at all.
So, in other words, you have nothing? Ok, that's what I thought. Just want to make sure. You come off all tough like you know something, then you coward away in more irrelevant words. If you can't provide a definition and explain how those words were used incorrectly, then obviously you're full of ish. Especially if you're using the same amount of effort NOT doing it.
Allegory wrote:
Because everyone here can see you're bad at making logical arguments, we're bigoted against you?
Almalieque wrote:
You, along with others, do not believe that there exist a single logical argument in support of any form of discrimination of homosexuals, which by definition makes YOU THE BIGOT, not me.
Your failure to comprehend that sentence only supports my above argument.
1. This had nothing to do with anyone agreeing with me. People have stated (i.e. OmegaVegeta) that there are no logical reasons in any scenario to EVER discriminate against homosexuality EVER. Yet, supports discrimination against every other human trait. That, by definition makes him bigoted in favor of homosexuals.
2. No where in that sentence did I allude to being bigoted against. That's purely something that you made up.