gbaji wrote:
Uglysasquatch wrote:
While its possible that you've done this, you have also defended Varus' stance and made it quite clear that while his reasoning is wrong, its important that he got the "right" answer.
What does "stance" mean in that sentence though? I'm talking about the conclusion, not the argument. And every single time I've done this, I've said that while his argument was wrong, his conclusion is right because <insert different/better argument>".
Yes, by stance, I mean conclusion. and yes, you've done exactly as you've stated here, however, at times, you've gone so far as state that it was important that he got the right answer, not how he got to it.
Look, I'm not going to go through the bother to look for exact examples, and you clearly don't want to accept that you've done this in the past, so I'm done with this, because at this point, this is going no where.