Almalieque wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
Duke Lubriderm wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Allegory wrote:
I plan on making general and ambiguous replies to certain posters in choice threads just so that they're never quite certain if they're banned or not.
And what Alma most recently posted is once again, hugely flawed. I'd point them out specifically, but I feel they're just so obvious it doesn't even need to be said.
And what Alma most recently posted is once again, hugely flawed. I'd point them out specifically, but I feel they're just so obvious it doesn't even need to be said.
Over the years, you have proven yourself to know just enough to be dangerous, but completely off in the overall logic department.. In other words, you have the tools, but fail to use them properly. A constant disappointment.
I find it telling that Alma views those who disagree with him, and can articulate themselves, as "dangerous". Dangerous to his fragile, but heavily guarded ego, perhaps?
The reality is, Allegory is echelons above most of the posters here, but not at the top. He has the structure to be a great debater, but somehow lacks certain things preventing him from being a "power house". The rest of you all, excluding a few, have absolutely nothing notable other than persistence of ignorance and stupidity.
