HIV rises 50% among black gaysFollow

Still waiting....



You radical limp d*cked liberals can't provide any proof that allowing gay marriage will do anything to reduce their risk of contracting aids.

In a bid to curb the menace caused by HIV/AIDS, experts recommend making same-sex marriages legal, as almost one in every five in the gay community has AIDS.

Targeting such high-risk groups is the main agenda for AIDS societies worldwide as experts have cautioned that the gay community is at a higher risk of becoming HIV positive.

China, otherwise, has only a 0.05 percent population that is infected with AIDS.

Professor Zhang Beichuan from the Qingdao University said, “The lack of legal recognition for same-sex marriage is partially responsible for members of the gay community having multiple sexual partners, which increases the risk of HIV infection."
He stated, “To legalize same-sex marriage could help stabilize and sustain gay relationships, thereby lowering the risk of contracting HIV/AIDS"

An article published in 2009 in the Journal of Health Economics, a peer-reviewed academic journal, examines the relationship between homosexual tolerance and AIDS rates. They found that an increase in tolerance significantly reduces the rate of HIV. They also found that laws that ban marriage between individuals of the same sex increase HIV rate by between 3 and 5 per hundred thousand.

A link to the study, which you won't bother to read.

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 3:48pm by Spoonless

Yeah, that page is referencing the study I linked, which is just a link to a PDF file. Was it not working for you?

Annual diagnoses have slightly declined since then with 6,136 people diagnosed HIV-positive in 2010

Although HIV is often perceived to be a ‘gay’ problem, infections acquired through heterosexual sex account for the largest number of HIV diagnoses in the UK. The majority of people who acquired HIV heterosexually were infected overseas but only became aware of their status after being tested in the UK. In terms of HIV infections actually occurring within the UK, gay men (and other men who have sex with men) accounted for two thirds of new cases in 2010

Do you not understand that a blood transfusion is a blood transfusion. Therefore, you should lump "sharing needles" with every other blood transfusion. You're simply not wanting to single out "**** sex", because people might just think homosexual. But, by labeling "sharing needles", you're equally doing the same thing to drug users.

What other group of people share needles?

That's the thing... It's not "sharing needles", it's using unclean needles. Drug users "share needles", so by saying "sharing needles", you're singling out drug users. That's cool, if you're simply referencing activities that have high likelihood of contracting AIDS, but doing so also includes **** sex. Don't say one and not the other.

It's not using unclean needles though, is it. It's using "used" needles.