Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

HIV rises 50% among black gaysFollow

#27 Aug 04 2011 at 12:07 PM Rating: Excellent
***
2,580 posts
Almalieque wrote:
Jimpadan wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Jimpadan wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Jimpadan wrote:
Unprotected sex, needle sharing, etc. causes STD transmission not the gender or sexual preference of the participants. If you want to make a case that homosexual black men are the least safe in their sexual practices then you'd have a case.

Saying that being a **** causes STD transmission is retarded.

also virus and gay black sex google searches etc. etc.

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 1:43pm by Jimpadan



TO be fair, if you're going to list "needle sharing", then you should list "**** sex" (hetero/****) as it's unsafer than vaginal sex. Or at least that was what was taught to me in Bio..


Unprotected **** sex is still unprotected sex. You do realize you can pack sh*t with a condom on right?


Yes, I know, but you listed "sharing needles".. it's not the needles, it's the blood, which could equally give you aids in any other method.


I'm listing needles as a separate source because it doesn't require sexual contact. I put the etc. in there because you can trade blood/sexual fluids without sexual contact either but it is much less likely.



IT doesn't matter. If you're going to segregate because of likelihood, then you should mention **** sex then.

The bottom line is that it's the blood, not the needles. You can't be against saying "**** sex" because that somehow implies that homos are more likely to get AIDS, but say "needles", to imply that druggies are more likely to get AIDS.



Do you not understand that if an **** tear occurs while using protection that no blood is transferred? I lump all sex into one category because transmission can be stopped by proper use of protection.
#28 Aug 04 2011 at 12:11 PM Rating: Excellent
****
9,526 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
In other news, homosexual women, across all races and socio-economic types, remain the least likely to contract HIV.


varusword75 wrote:
What a surprise liberals have nothing to say about the fact that evidence continues to mount that homosexuals are living a deviant lifestyle and the choices they make while living in this manner have directly caused their condition.

Normalizing homosexuality will only increase sexually transmitted diseases. Just another class of degenerates the liberals are pandering to.



Sorry, but you haven't taken into account that homosexual women are the least likely to contract HIV (and most other STDs)... so what exactly is your point again? Oh, right, you're a bigot and you don't have one.
#29REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2011 at 12:16 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Nads,
#30 Aug 04 2011 at 12:20 PM Rating: Default
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
TO be fair, if you're going to list "needle sharing", then you should list "**** sex" (hetero/****) as it's unsafer than vaginal sex. Or at least that was what was taught to me in Bio..


True.

Varus latched onto the "**** sex can cause tears, which makes the transmittal of STDs and HIV more likely" and attached it to "all homos have a higher chance of getting AIDS." The truth is, **** sex isn't limited to homosexuals. As has been pointed out a million times, homosexual women are the lowest group likely to get and pass on AIDS. But anything that he can dig into and use to spread his hatred works for him.




Sup bb gurl, you free this weekend?

In all honesty, I don't have any sympathy for anyone who gets the hiv from @#%^ing randoms without protection or sharing needles. They're pretty much being culled by the grace of god. I say that as someone who's done both at points in my life (I'm pretty well sure I did the latter in the middle of a oxy stupor at some point). If I were to find out I have AIDS (I'm pretty sure I don't but I can't be @#%^ed to get tested) I wouldn't @#%^ around with expensive treatments when the funding for them could go to helping people who have diseases resulting from misfortune rather than their own stupidity.

On a side note, I find gays pretty @#%^ing disgusting but they're actually alright people. If they can stomach the thought of sticking it into some sweaty, hairy, smelly dude then they're better men than I am. Furthermore, I don't see any reason to condemn or curse them. Napoleonic code, basically. It doesn't affect you, mind your own ******* business. < directed at Varus

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 2:22pm by zukunftsangst
#31 Aug 04 2011 at 12:21 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Gumbo Galahad wrote:
Did prohibition stop alcohol consumption?
You cited an example that proves you wrong there, Frenchy.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#32 Aug 04 2011 at 12:25 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Quote:
Encouraging monogamous relationships through the state institution of marriage will decrease the likelihood of sex with multiple partners


This is a lie. How's that for addressing it? There's absolutely no evidence to support this absurd claim. You're basically saying a law will change homosexuals entire behaviour. Did prohibition stop alcohol consumption? Did the war on drugs decrease drug use? What examples do you have to support this idiotic claim?

Gay marriage = allowing more marriage. Do you agree monogamous relationships are reinforced through marriage? And people in monogamous relationships do not transmit HIV as often? Oh good!

Also, not sure how banning things (drugs, alcohol) aligns with more freedom (opening up marriage). I mean, I'm sure it does in your mind, but it's idiotic Smiley: grin

Quote:
Homosexual women are the least likely to get HIV
While they are less likely to get HIV the rate at which they're contracting it has increased;[/quote]
Ctrl+F: lesbians (1 result, to the contact info for an LGBT group)
Ctrl+F: homosexual (zero)

Huh. Guess you're wrong. Aaaaagain Smiley: lol

Quote:
And I think we all know why lesbians are the least likely to get HIV....they don't have d*cks.

Yup! And your point is? I guess... male castration is the best way to stop? You first!
#33 Aug 04 2011 at 12:28 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
zukunftsangst wrote:
If I were to find out I have AIDS (I'm pretty sure I don't but I can't be @#%^ed to get tested) I wouldn't @#%^ around with expensive treatments when the funding for them could go to helping people who have diseases resulting from misfortune rather than their own stupidity.

While I do appreciate your willingness to take one for the team (hell, for humanity in your case) and die without treatment if you got HIV, I'm rather shocked you don't get blood tests or even donate blood. Blood tests are usually part of my yearly preventative; and I personally donate blood whenever I'm eligible. Working next to a hospital is one reason; getting wasted on two drinks after is another Smiley: lol
#34REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2011 at 12:42 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Locked,
#35 Aug 04 2011 at 12:48 PM Rating: Default
LockeColeMA wrote:
zukunftsangst wrote:
If I were to find out I have AIDS (I'm pretty sure I don't but I can't be @#%^ed to get tested) I wouldn't @#%^ around with expensive treatments when the funding for them could go to helping people who have diseases resulting from misfortune rather than their own stupidity.

While I do appreciate your willingness to take one for the team (hell, for humanity in your case) and die without treatment if you got HIV, I'm rather shocked you don't get blood tests or even donate blood. Blood tests are usually part of my yearly preventative; and I personally donate blood whenever I'm eligible. Working next to a hospital is one reason; getting wasted on two drinks after is another Smiley: lol


I don't see what call there is to be shocked. I don't bother with annual checkups and the like, I suppose because of a mixture of apathy and fatalism. I have no particular objection to donating blood, it just never really occurs to me as something to do.

Besides, I have to go in for major surgeries every year or three. I figure if there's a pertinent issue they'll tell me then.
#36 Aug 04 2011 at 12:50 PM Rating: Excellent
zukunftsangst wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
While I do appreciate your willingness to take one for the team (hell, for humanity in your case) and die without treatment if you got HIV, I'm rather shocked you don't get blood tests or even donate blood. Blood tests are usually part of my yearly preventative; and I personally donate blood whenever I'm eligible. Working next to a hospital is one reason; getting wasted on two drinks after is another Smiley: lol


I don't see what call there is to be shocked. I don't bother with annual checkups and the like, I suppose because of a mixture of apathy and fatalism. I have no particular objection to donating blood, it just never really occurs to me as something to do.

Besides, I have to go in for major surgeries every year or three. I figure if there's a pertinent issue they'll tell me then.


The only thing that would worry me is if you were going around ******** unsuspecting people while you might be carrying a virus.
#37 Aug 04 2011 at 12:51 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Not only that but look at the rate at which AIDS is spreading in the UK and other countries that have allowed gay marriage like spain
Cuz we all know sex increases after marriage, AMIRITE?
#38REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2011 at 12:54 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Can any of you liberal whack jobs provide any evidence that countries that allow gay marriage have seen a decline in aids?
#39 Aug 04 2011 at 12:59 PM Rating: Good
varusword75 wrote:
Can any of you liberal whack jobs provide any evidence that countries that allow gay marriage have seen a decline in aids?

Anyone?




Can you show where outlawing same-sex marriage has shown a decline in cancer? Because that has just as much relevance.
#40 Aug 04 2011 at 1:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
Shocking as it may seem, since we allowed gay marriage (civil partnership, you know what I mean) there hasn't been an AIDS epidemic here in the UK. I'm not sure where you get off making sh*t up Varus.

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 3:04pm by Nilatai
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#41 Aug 04 2011 at 1:01 PM Rating: Decent
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
zukunftsangst wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
While I do appreciate your willingness to take one for the team (hell, for humanity in your case) and die without treatment if you got HIV, I'm rather shocked you don't get blood tests or even donate blood. Blood tests are usually part of my yearly preventative; and I personally donate blood whenever I'm eligible. Working next to a hospital is one reason; getting wasted on two drinks after is another Smiley: lol


I don't see what call there is to be shocked. I don't bother with annual checkups and the like, I suppose because of a mixture of apathy and fatalism. I have no particular objection to donating blood, it just never really occurs to me as something to do.

Besides, I have to go in for major surgeries every year or three. I figure if there's a pertinent issue they'll tell me then.


The only thing that would worry me is if you were going around ******** unsuspecting
people while you might be carrying a virus.


I usually try to make sure they suspect we're going to ***** before I stick it in Smiley: lolSmiley: lol

#42 Aug 04 2011 at 1:02 PM Rating: Good
zukunftsangst wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:

The only thing that would worry me is if you were going around ******** unsuspecting
people while you might be carrying a virus.


I usually try to make sure they suspect we're going to ***** before I stick it in Smiley: lolSmiley: lol



Smiley: lol

I mean that they don't know you have a virus. Smiley: tongue
#43 Aug 04 2011 at 1:04 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Locked,

Quote:
Do you agree monogamous relationships are reinforced through marriage?


No. Otherwise the divorce rate wouldn't be over 60%.
Then they're not married any more, huh? So you're of the opinion that single people have fewer (and safer) sex partners than married folks. That's odd, especially considering your bragging coming from UT
#44 Aug 04 2011 at 1:14 PM Rating: Decent
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
zukunftsangst wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:

The only thing that would worry me is if you were going around ******** unsuspecting
people while you might be carrying a virus.


I usually try to make sure they suspect we're going to ***** before I stick it in Smiley: lolSmiley: lol



Smiley: lol

I mean that they don't know you have a virus. Smiley: tongue


You're right, I'll probably stock up on some condoms and get tested when I can. I guess it's the reasonable thing to do now that I'm technically an adult.
#45 Aug 04 2011 at 1:14 PM Rating: Excellent
I'm sorry ... but is this dude for real?!?

Varus -- you keep spouting about "you liberals" because they are calling out your stupidity. That has nothing to do with it. I normally don't post in here, but just read for the lulz, but please oh please for the love of the Goddess -- STFU!!

#46 Aug 04 2011 at 1:15 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Elspetta wrote:
I'm sorry ... but is this dude for real?!?
Nope.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#47 Aug 04 2011 at 1:17 PM Rating: Excellent
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Elspetta wrote:
I'm sorry ... but is this dude for real?!?
Nope.

This.
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#48 Aug 04 2011 at 1:20 PM Rating: Good
lolgaxe wrote:
Elspetta wrote:
I'm sorry ... but is this dude for real?!?
Nope.


Back to the hyperventilating pony I see! When you switched to Captain America it totally threw me for a loop! Smiley: grin
#49 Aug 04 2011 at 1:28 PM Rating: Default
Elspetta wrote:
I'm sorry ... but is this dude for real?!?

Varus -- you keep spouting about "you liberals" because they are calling out your stupidity. That has nothing to do with it. I normally don't post in here, but just read for the lulz, but please oh please for the love of the Goddess -- STFU!!



I was going to make a thread about this but the Gbaji joke I had in mind wasn't clever enough.

http://www.fwweekly.com/index.php?option=com_wordpress&p=11607&Itemid=12

Quote:
Meet Dale Fout [pictured, left] and Brenda Godwin. One weekday in April, they both went to a movie theater in Grapevine.
Both are 54. Fout, a marketing consultant, describes himself as a 220-pound “pretty big guy. I’m broad. I’m not fat. Used to play football.” Godwin says she is a 136-pound skin care specialist.


Quote:
Her side
“He had his phone out. The light was shining at me. I’m thinking, ‘He’s going to turn it off.’” But he didn’t. ‘OK, this is ridiculous.’ So I reached over and tapped him on the shoulder. It was very bright. I was only trying to get his attention. He whipped around and said, ‘Don’t ever touch me.’ I was a little taken aback.
“He jumps up and whirls around towards me and says, ‘I am charging you with assault,’ and he flew out of the theater.”

His side
“I got a text, and I responded to it because it was something important. It was something that was on a deadline situation, OK. [GRRR, MARKETING CAMPAIGNS NEVER SLEEP! -Ed] I held it against my chest purposely where I could barely see it. … I could text but hide the majority of the light coming from the phone.
“She said something. I couldn’t make it out. That’s why I turned. She was probably saying something like, ‘Get off your phone.’ I turned, and she pushed. She just happened to push my neck at the time my neck was in an awkward position. Kinda like having a little fender bender, and you get a little whiplash in your neck, you know.”


Quote:
The 54-year-old Fout characterized himself as “outspoken” and “fiery” but said he would never strike a woman and doesn’t seek confrontation with people. Indeed, he was the one who left the theater and complained to the manager about the woman’s “haughty” attitude and about her pushing him. He didn’t confront her or make a scene inside the theater because he didn’t want to bother other patrons. He did the right thing, he said. Besides, he was making one little text and holding his phone up close to his chest so the light wouldn’t bother anyone else. The woman was making a big deal out of nothing.

“I was more offended by her attitude than what she did to me,” he said. “All she had to do was say, ‘Hey, that phone is bothering me,’ and I would have apologized and stepped out [of the theater]. But don’t push me.”

He was also offended by the way Lieber presented the story.

“Obviously the guy slanted the story because in all likelihood he’s a liberal,” Fout said.The 54-year-old Fout characterized himself as “outspoken” and “fiery” but said he would never strike a woman and doesn’t seek confrontation with people. Indeed, he was the one who left the theater and complained to the manager about the woman’s “haughty” attitude and about her pushing him. He didn’t confront her or make a scene inside the theater because he didn’t want to bother other patrons. He did the right thing, he said. Besides, he was making one little text and holding his phone up close to his chest so the light wouldn’t bother anyone else. The woman was making a big deal out of nothing.

“I was more offended by her attitude than what she did to me,” he said. “All she had to do was say, ‘Hey, that phone is bothering me,’ and I would have apologized and stepped out [of the theater]. But don’t push me.”

He was also offended by the way Lieber presented the story.

“Obviously the guy slanted the story because in all likelihood he’s a liberal,” Fout said.
#50REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2011 at 1:33 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Still waiting....
#51 Aug 04 2011 at 1:34 PM Rating: Excellent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Normalizing homosexuality will only increase sexually transmitted diseases.


Know what would decrease STDs? Not only in homosexuals, but across the board?

SEXUAL EDUCATION. Real sex ed, not "abstinence only". It also decreases unwanted and underage pregnancies.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 241 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (241)