« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Reply To Thread

HIV rises 50% among black gaysFollow

#1 Aug 04 2011 at 8:22 AM Rating: Sub-Default

__DEL__1592790358379

2,971 posts

Quote:

While blacks represent 14 percent of the U.S. population, they accounted for 44 percent of new HIV infections in 2009. HIV infection rates among blacks were nearly eight times higher than rates in whites, according to the study.

Hispanics, who represent about 16 percent of the population, accounted for 20 percent of new HIV infections in 2009 - a rate that was nearly three times as high as that of whites.

Men who have sex with men - which includes openly gay and bisexual men and those who do not identify themselves as gay or bisexual - remain most heavily affected.

Quote:

While this group represents 2 percent of the overall U.S. population, they accounted for 61 percent of all new HIV infections in 2009.

Homosexuality is a deadly lifestyle choice. And this is why our govn should not be doing anything to support these people.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/08/03/us-usa-hiv-infections-idUSTRE7724SO20110803?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews

#2 Aug 04 2011 at 8:24 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1657498899608

Guru

12,049 posts

In other news, homosexual women, across all races and socio-economic types, remain the least likely to contract HIV.

#3 Aug 04 2011 at 8:27 AM Rating: Excellent

View User Forum

Liberal Conspiracy

TILT

Nothing about the white gays, huh? Good news for Varus!

____________________________

Belkira wrote:

Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.

#4 Aug 04 2011 at 8:35 AM Rating: Excellent

Prodigal Son

20,643 posts

varusword75 wrote:

[quote]Homosexuality is a deadly lifestyle choice. And this is why our govn should not be doing anything to support these people.

Doesn't hold a candle to smoking. When will we ban cigarettes, then?

____________________________

publiusvarus wrote:

we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.

#5 REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2011 at 8:47 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Debo,

#6 Aug 04 2011 at 8:50 AM Rating: Excellent

View User Forum

Liberal Conspiracy

TILT

varusword75 wrote:

I know you have the intellectual capacity of a snail so it's probably best you stay out of this conversation.

Afraid he'll outwit you?

____________________________

Belkira wrote:

Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.

#7 Aug 04 2011 at 9:06 AM Rating: Excellent

View User Forum

+1

50,767 posts

You just know varus' Google history is full of variations of "Black Gay Sex."

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 11:06am by lolgaxe

____________________________

George Carlin wrote:

I think itâ€™s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.

#8 Aug 04 2011 at 9:11 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1649636418093

View User Forum

Sage

30,646 posts

Debalic wrote:

Doesn't hold a candle to smoking. When will we ban ~~cigarettes~~ smokers from being able to marry and adopt children, then?

FTFY

#9 Aug 04 2011 at 9:15 AM Rating: Excellent

View User Forum

Skelly Poker Since 2008

16,781 posts

varusword75 wrote:

Homosexuality is a deadly lifestyle choice. And this is why our govn should not be doing anything to support these people.

If there is a group of individuals who are beset upon by a communicable disease, the government should provide assistance to minimize adverse effects.

Still, equal treatment by our governing bodies, regardless of sexual preference, doesn't cause aids.

____________________________

Alma wrote:

I lost my post

#10 Aug 04 2011 at 9:44 AM Rating: Decent

View User Forum

Scholar

7,566 posts

wait you can only get aids if you take it in the *** now?

____________________________

HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#11 REDACTED, Posted: Aug 04 2011 at 9:49 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) What a surprise liberals have nothing to say about the fact that evidence continues to mount that homosexuals are living a deviant lifestyle and the choices they make while living in this manner have directly caused their condition.

#12 Aug 04 2011 at 10:03 AM Rating: Default

View User Forum

Scholar

7,566 posts

did you ever think men with aids turn gay because they can no longer safely have sex with a ******, they can not have children safely etc etc. Or did your brain turn off when you saw ****? Maybe their condition has caused them to live that way, or maybe they didn't have a choice and their body said I like ****. Also what is your obsession with gay black men? Are you jealous that they aren't interested in you?

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 12:04pm by rdmcandie

____________________________

HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#13 Aug 04 2011 at 10:13 AM Rating: Excellent

View User Forum

Liberal Conspiracy

TILT

varusword75 wrote:

What a surprise liberals have nothing to say

lolirony

____________________________

Belkira wrote:

Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.

#14 Aug 04 2011 at 10:23 AM Rating: Good

View User Forum

Skelly Poker Since 2008

16,781 posts

varusword75 wrote:

What a surprise liberals have nothing to say about the fact that evidence continues to mount that homosexuals are living a deviant lifestyle and the choices they make while living in this manner have directly caused their condition.

Normalizing homosexuality will only increase sexually transmitted diseases. Just another class of degenerates the liberals are pandering to.

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 11:49am by varusword75

STD's are spread by (not caused by) sex. Gender of either partner is irrelevant.

Outlawing sex all together, substituting IVF for procreation and sensory enhanced simulated sex programs (non-contact) to provide that-loving-feeling, might be a better STD elimination plan.

____________________________

Alma wrote:

I lost my post

#15 Aug 04 2011 at 10:26 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1657498899608

Guru

12,049 posts

varusword75 wrote:

Normalizing homosexuality will only increase sexually transmitted diseases. Just another class of degenerates the liberals are pandering to.

Encouraging monogamous relationships through the state institution of marriage will decrease the likelihood of sex with multiple partners, thus decreasing HIV transmissions among gay men. Smiley: schooled

Smiley: schooled

And as said, homosexual encompasses more than only one sex. Homosexual women are the least likely to get HIV.

#16 Aug 04 2011 at 10:35 AM Rating: Excellent

Gurue

16,299 posts

LockeColeMA wrote:

varusword75 wrote:

Normalizing homosexuality will only increase sexually transmitted diseases. Just another class of degenerates the liberals are pandering to.

Encouraging monogamous relationships through the state institution of marriage will decrease the likelihood of sex with multiple partners, thus decreasing HIV transmissions among gay men. Smiley: schooled

Smiley: schooled

And as said, homosexual encompasses more than only one sex. Homosexual women are the least likely to get HIV.

varus has never addressed either of these points, even though it's been brought up 4,309 times. He thinks there are packs of roving HIV infected gay men out there, trying to take over the world by killing us all.

#17 Aug 04 2011 at 10:42 AM Rating: Default

View User Forum

Scholar

7,566 posts

It wouldn't be all of us, just dudes, women are icky, and there for safe.

____________________________

HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#18 Aug 04 2011 at 11:12 AM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1592326442707

150 posts

rdmcandie wrote:

did you ever think men with aids turn gay because they can no longer safely have sex with a ******

What in the actual ****???

????

Question marks for emphasis. ????

#19 Aug 04 2011 at 11:43 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1656893887359

Scholar

2,580 posts

Unprotected sex, needle sharing, etc. causes STD transmission not the gender or sexual preference of the participants. If you want to make a case that homosexual black men are the least safe in their sexual practices then you'd have a case.

Saying that being a **** causes STD transmission is retarded.

also virus and gay black sex google searches etc. etc.

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 1:43pm by Jimpadan

#20 Aug 04 2011 at 11:45 AM Rating: Excellent

View User Forum

Drunken English Bastard

15,268 posts

Jimpadan wrote:

Saying that being a **** causes STD transmission is retarded.

Par for the course.

____________________________

My Movember page

Solrain wrote:

WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:

ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3

#21 Aug 04 2011 at 11:45 AM Rating: Decent

The All Knowing

10,265 posts

Jimpadan wrote:

Unprotected sex, needle sharing, etc. causes STD transmission not the gender or sexual preference of the participants. If you want to make a case that homosexual black men are the least safe in their sexual practices then you'd have a case.

Saying that being a **** causes STD transmission is retarded.

also virus and gay black sex google searches etc. etc.

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 1:43pm by Jimpadan

TO be fair, if you're going to list "needle sharing", then you should list "**** sex" (hetero/****) as it's unsafer than vaginal sex. Or at least that was what was taught to me in Bio..

#22 Aug 04 2011 at 11:47 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1656893887359

Scholar

2,580 posts

Almalieque wrote:

Jimpadan wrote:

Unprotected sex, needle sharing, etc. causes STD transmission not the gender or sexual preference of the participants. If you want to make a case that homosexual black men are the least safe in their sexual practices then you'd have a case.

Saying that being a **** causes STD transmission is retarded.

also virus and gay black sex google searches etc. etc.

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 1:43pm by Jimpadan

TO be fair, if you're going to list "needle sharing", then you should list "**** sex" (hetero/****) as it's unsafer than vaginal sex. Or at least that was what was taught to me in Bio..

Unprotected **** sex is still unprotected sex. You do realize you can pack **** with a condom on right?

#23 Aug 04 2011 at 11:50 AM Rating: Default

The All Knowing

10,265 posts

Jimpadan wrote:

Almalieque wrote:

Jimpadan wrote:

Unprotected sex, needle sharing, etc. causes STD transmission not the gender or sexual preference of the participants. If you want to make a case that homosexual black men are the least safe in their sexual practices then you'd have a case.

Saying that being a **** causes STD transmission is retarded.

also virus and gay black sex google searches etc. etc.

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 1:43pm by Jimpadan

TO be fair, if you're going to list "needle sharing", then you should list "**** sex" (hetero/****) as it's unsafer than vaginal sex. Or at least that was what was taught to me in Bio..

Unprotected **** sex is still unprotected sex. You do realize you can pack sh*t with a condom on right?

Yes, I know, but you listed "sharing needles".. it's not the needles, it's the blood, which could equally give you aids in any other method.

#24 Aug 04 2011 at 11:53 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1656893887359

Scholar

2,580 posts

Almalieque wrote:

Jimpadan wrote:

Almalieque wrote:

Jimpadan wrote:

Unprotected sex, needle sharing, etc. causes STD transmission not the gender or sexual preference of the participants. If you want to make a case that homosexual black men are the least safe in their sexual practices then you'd have a case.

Saying that being a **** causes STD transmission is retarded.

also virus and gay black sex google searches etc. etc.

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 1:43pm by Jimpadan

TO be fair, if you're going to list "needle sharing", then you should list "**** sex" (hetero/****) as it's unsafer than vaginal sex. Or at least that was what was taught to me in Bio..

Unprotected **** sex is still unprotected sex. You do realize you can pack sh*t with a condom on right?

Yes, I know, but you listed "sharing needles".. it's not the needles, it's the blood, which could equally give you aids in any other method.

I'm listing needles as a separate source because it doesn't require sexual contact. I put the etc. in there because you can trade blood/sexual fluids without sexual contact also but it is much less likely.

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 1:59pm by Jimpadan

#25 Aug 04 2011 at 11:59 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1649636418093

View User Forum

Sage

30,646 posts

Almalieque wrote:

TO be fair, if you're going to list "needle sharing", then you should list "**** sex" (hetero/****) as it's unsafer than vaginal sex. Or at least that was what was taught to me in Bio..

True.

Varus latched onto the "**** sex can cause tears, which makes the transmittal of STDs and HIV more likely" and attached it to "all homos have a higher chance of getting AIDS." The truth is, **** sex isn't limited to homosexuals. As has been pointed out a million times, homosexual women are the lowest group likely to get and pass on AIDS. But anything that he can dig into and use to spread his hatred works for him.

#26 Aug 04 2011 at 11:59 AM Rating: Default

The All Knowing

10,265 posts

Jimpadan wrote:

Almalieque wrote:

Jimpadan wrote:

Almalieque wrote:

Jimpadan wrote:

Unprotected sex, needle sharing, etc. causes STD transmission not the gender or sexual preference of the participants. If you want to make a case that homosexual black men are the least safe in their sexual practices then you'd have a case.

Saying that being a **** causes STD transmission is retarded.

also virus and gay black sex google searches etc. etc.

Edited, Aug 4th 2011 1:43pm by Jimpadan

TO be fair, if you're going to list "needle sharing", then you should list "**** sex" (hetero/****) as it's unsafer than vaginal sex. Or at least that was what was taught to me in Bio..

Unprotected **** sex is still unprotected sex. You do realize you can pack sh*t with a condom on right?

Yes, I know, but you listed "sharing needles".. it's not the needles, it's the blood, which could equally give you aids in any other method.

I'm listing needles as a separate source because it doesn't require sexual contact. I put the etc. in there because you can trade blood/sexual fluids without sexual contact either but it is much less likely.

IT doesn't matter. If you're going to segregate because of likelihood, then you should mention **** sex then.

The bottom line is that it's the blood, not the needles. You can't be against saying "**** sex" because that somehow implies that homos are more likely to get AIDS, but say "needles", to imply that druggies are more likely to get AIDS.

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Reply To Thread

Recent Visitors: 232 All times are in CST

Anonymous Guests (232)

© 2024 Fanbyte LLC