Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Legalized Prostitution?Follow

#152 Aug 02 2011 at 3:30 PM Rating: Excellent
****
9,526 posts


Belkira the Tulip wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Nads,

Quote:
Huh. I really don't remember going to dinner or a movie or anywhere the first time I had sex with my husband


Had he ever taken you out before that? How many dinners did it take before you let him hit that? Or are you, as I suspect, just trailer trash and f*cked him the first day he wandered down from his part of the trailer park?


Alma, I hope it makes you feel good to have this moron agreeing with you. And maybe you'll understand why some of us think you're a misogynist.


My favourite part is where on one hand women are "princesses" and spoiled etc. for expecting to be wooed - but if they just wanna do the horizontal tango they are hillbilly trailer trash.

No misogyny here at all...

Edited, Aug 2nd 2011 2:30pm by Olorinus
#153 Aug 02 2011 at 3:34 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Almalieque wrote:



1. a The women that exist to prove my point, were in reference to whores and sluts. I said that the simple fact that those words exist and have different meanings other than a person, male or female who has casual sex for no real reason other sexual satisfaction, proves my point that they it isn't typical.


So you're calling me a ****.

Don't ever tell anyone one of us that we shouldn't resort to name calling.

Dumbass.



Maybe you should reread my comment, because I'm sure you misread it.
#154 Aug 02 2011 at 3:34 PM Rating: Excellent
****
9,526 posts
Almalieque wrote:
The women that exist to prove my point, were in reference to whores and sluts.



Ok, so you are saying women who pick up someone for some quick, fun sex are "whores and sluts" but ...you're not misogynist at all?

I think you ought to take a serious look at Locke's advice. You could use a diagnosis, cause you're clearly not in touch with the same reality the rest of us inhabit.
#155 Aug 02 2011 at 3:36 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Alma and varus are just pissed that they don't have the skills to get a woman to sleep with them without a bribe first (money, dinner, whatever).
#156 Aug 02 2011 at 3:37 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Iron Chef Olorinus wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
The women that exist to prove my point, were in reference to whores and sluts.



Ok, so you are saying women who pick up someone for some quick, fun sex are "whores and sluts" but ...you're not misogynist at all?

I think you ought to take a serious look at Locke's advice. You could use a diagnosis, cause you're clearly not in touch with the same reality the rest of us inhabit.



NO, said the opposite.. go back and reread.
#157Almalieque, Posted: Aug 02 2011 at 3:38 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Uh, no. you're just incapable of reading.
#158 Aug 02 2011 at 3:38 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
That's always your excuse. "You can't read!"
#159 Aug 02 2011 at 3:40 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Nadenu wrote:
That's always your excuse. "You can't read!"



Ok, tell me how you get

"Ok, so you are saying women who pick up someone for some quick, fun sex are "whores and sluts""

From

"I was referring to whores and sluts. Just because a woman will have sex with a man without him needing to shell out money, doesn't make her a *****. How sexist of you to think otherwise. "
#160 Aug 02 2011 at 3:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
I am only doing this because I'm bored.

What is your messed up definition of the difference between a woman that will have sex without being paid first and a *****? Because that's the only two types of women, right? Either you end up paying in some way, shape or form, or she's the type that sleeps around ALL the time.
#161Almalieque, Posted: Aug 02 2011 at 3:51 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I've explained the difference. If you're not going to take the time to read and understand before making stupid comments, then you can remain ignorant.
#162 Aug 02 2011 at 3:54 PM Rating: Excellent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
I'm honestly afraid you have a mental disorder that makes you unable to empathize with others (antisocial disorder? Not positive if that's the right one).

I think you're wrong. I don't see lack of empathy in Alma. What I see is an unawareness of of how he is perceived. It's a problem we all have to varying degrees. It's hard to see ourselves as a stranger would see us. The most stereotypical instance of this is singing. Many people have difficulty perceiving how badly they personally are able to sing, even if they have the capacity to perceive how badly others sing. Another occurrence is when sometimes someone is caught in a blatant and obvious lie, yet does not believe others are fully aware he/she is lying, and instead assumes that they are merely suspicious and guessing the truth.

I think Alma blunders because he doesn't realize just how apparent some of his mistakes are, and believes by maintaining a certain stance he can hide them from others.
#163 Aug 02 2011 at 4:15 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Allegory wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
I'm honestly afraid you have a mental disorder that makes you unable to empathize with others (antisocial disorder? Not positive if that's the right one).

I think you're wrong. I don't see lack of empathy in Alma. What I see is an unawareness of of how he is perceived. It's a problem we all have to varying degrees. It's hard to see ourselves as a stranger would see us. The most stereotypical instance of this is singing. Many people have difficulty perceiving how badly they personally are able to sing, even if they have the capacity to perceive how badly others sing. Another occurrence is when sometimes someone is caught in a blatant and obvious lie, yet does not believe others are fully aware he/she is lying, and instead assumes that they are merely suspicious and guessing the truth.

I think Alma blunders because he doesn't realize just how apparent some of his mistakes are, and believes by maintaining a certain stance he can hide them from others.



Not at all...

I know how I'm perceived, I just don't care coming from a bunch of self ignorant hypocrites. I mean seriously... You think I should take offense by being perceived as a "sexist"? I get called a sexist/misogynist for saying "shelled out" yet you all support the belief of women being naturally born ugly due to mutations. Seriously? GTFOWTBS

If you all were consistent and not hypocrites, then your judgement of me would matter more. Instead, you create arguments of me, don't read half the stuff I write and oppose me out of spite.

So, I apologize for not taking you all seriously..
#164 Aug 02 2011 at 4:17 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Allegory wrote:
I think Alma blunders because he doesn't realize just how apparent some of his mistakes are, and believes by maintaining a certain stance he can hide them from others.
Bigger problem is if he is an officer, then he's surrounded by people that are obligated to agree with him regardless. Most of us have to listen to officers go on and on about whatever and have to smile and nod, and when they leave we get to go and either do the mission that the officer had no idea how to complete done correctly, or just go to a gym and exercise the frustration of the idiocy away.

It's really sad.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#165 Aug 02 2011 at 4:26 PM Rating: Excellent
-REDACTED-
Scholar
***
1,150 posts
Alma wrote:
Not at all...

I know how I'm perceived, I just don't care coming from a bunch of self ignorant hypocrites. I mean seriously... You think I should take offense by being perceived as a "sexist"? I get called a sexist/misogynist for saying "shelled out" yet you all support the belief of women being naturally born ugly due to mutations. Seriously? GTFOWTBS


Yea, I saw your logic on that one.

Just because someone does not comment in a thread, does not mean that they agree with the premise. Some stuff just isn't worth comment. Like most of what you post, you retarded pile of horse shit.

Edited, Aug 2nd 2011 6:26pm by ShadorVIII
#166 Aug 02 2011 at 4:27 PM Rating: Good
****
9,997 posts
Save some for me guys. It's not every day I get to psychobabble.

I'm pretty confident that the root of Alma's problem is a Narcissistic Personality Disorder, characterized by excessive concern over the self, and evidenced by the continual defensiveness, refusal to relinquish attention, and of course, the failure to accept criticisms of the self, alongside a perception that others are inferior in enduring characteristics.

This commonly manifests as a series of fundamental attribution errors. e.g., When "I" make a mistake, it's because of some temporary environmental factor. When others make a mistake, it is because they aren't as exceptional as "I" am. That's why we all make so many mistakes, but Alma is almost always correct. That's also why women are such fallible creatures who are either prostitutes or whores, while Alma's sexuality is so much nobler.

A particular element at play here is the hostile attribution bias... a particular attribution error that becomes ingrained in the individual's worldview, where enemies are all around (also germane to NPD). Interestingly, this is probably caused in part by Alma's constant socialization here, where he is in fact subject to constant hostility. This generates a mean world belief that the world is full of people like those here who fail to appreciate his views and inner workings. Therefor, he must be a superior specimen, but on the flip side, he will never be recognized as such. Unfortunately, most women aren't good enough to see what a great catch he is, and naturally he's not interested in those plebeians.

This is a real diagnosis, btw, which if one were to try to counsel, the last thing they would probably do is reveal the diagnosis... especially if they didn't have a relationship of trust with the individual. To do so would likely only sensitize the individual's usual defense mechanisms, resulting in reactance, and precluding any future success or acceptance of the diagnosis. The individual's only hope would be to learn on their own, the hard way.

Sorry, but Alma is one of the most interesting people on the forum. I can't let you guys go about fixing him (honestly though, not that you could). Of course, he could hypothetically use that diagnosis to self-treat, but that assumes he is able to accept that he has such extensive personality flaws, which is fundamentally improbable of the narcissist. Also, if he were to perceive this as some sort of reverse psychology, or taunt, the narcissist would never allow himself to fall for such a ruse.

Smiley: grin
#167 Aug 02 2011 at 4:28 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
Alma wrote:
Not at all...

I know how I'm perceived, I just don't care coming from a bunch of self ignorant hypocrites. I mean seriously... You think I should take offense by being perceived as a "sexist"? I get called a sexist/misogynist for saying "shelled out" yet you all support the belief of women being naturally born ugly due to mutations. Seriously? GTFOWTBS


Yea, I saw your logic on that one.

Just because someone does not comment in a thread, does not mean that they agree with the premise. Some stuff just isn't worth comment. Like most of what you post, you retarded pile of horse shit.

Edited, Aug 2nd 2011 6:26pm by ShadorVIII

This.
#168 Aug 02 2011 at 4:30 PM Rating: Default
lolgaxe wrote:
Allegory wrote:
I think Alma blunders because he doesn't realize just how apparent some of his mistakes are, and believes by maintaining a certain stance he can hide them from others.
Bigger problem is if he is an officer, then he's surrounded by people that are obligated to agree with him regardless. Most of us have to listen to officers go on and on about whatever and have to smile and nod, and when they leave we get to go and either do the mission that the officer had no idea how to complete done correctly, or just go to a gym and exercise the frustration of the idiocy away.

It's really sad.


Short of seeking citizenship or the most severe economic desperation, I don't see why anyone with a decent amount of intelligence would join the military. No offense, but I don't fire the benefits to outweigh the risks, trauma and drudgery.

Edited, Aug 2nd 2011 6:32pm by zukunftsangst
#169 Aug 02 2011 at 4:38 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
Kachi wrote:
Save some for me guys. It's not every day I get to psychobabble.

I'm pretty confident that the root of Alma's problem is a Narcissistic Personality Disorder, characterized by excessive concern over the self, and evidenced by the continual defensiveness, refusal to relinquish attention, and of course, the failure to accept criticisms of the self, alongside a perception that others are inferior in enduring characteristics.

This commonly manifests as a series of fundamental attribution errors. e.g., When "I" make a mistake, it's because of some temporary environmental factor. When others make a mistake, it is because they aren't as exceptional as "I" am. That's why we all make so many mistakes, but Alma is almost always correct. That's also why women are such fallible creatures who are either prostitutes or whores, while Alma's sexuality is so much nobler.

A particular element at play here is the hostile attribution bias... a particular attribution error that becomes ingrained in the individual's worldview, where enemies are all around (also germane to NPD). Interestingly, this is probably caused in part by Alma's constant socialization here, where he is in fact subject to constant hostility. This generates a mean world belief that the world is full of people like those here who fail to appreciate his views and inner workings. Therefor, he must be a superior specimen, but on the flip side, he will never be recognized as such. Unfortunately, most women aren't good enough to see what a great catch he is, and naturally he's not interested in those plebeians.

This is a real diagnosis, btw, which if one were to try to counsel, the last thing they would probably do is reveal the diagnosis... especially if they didn't have a relationship of trust with the individual. To do so would likely only sensitize the individual's usual defense mechanisms, resulting in reactance, and precluding any future success or acceptance of the diagnosis. The individual's only hope would be to learn on their own, the hard way.

Sorry, but Alma is one of the most interesting people on the forum. I can't let you guys go about fixing him (honestly though, not that you could). Of course, he could hypothetically use that diagnosis to self-treat, but that assumes he is able to accept that he has such extensive personality flaws, which is fundamentally improbable of the narcissist. Also, if he were to perceive this as some sort of reverse psychology, or taunt, the narcissist would never allow himself to fall for such a ruse.

Smiley: grin


Kachi's best post?
#170 Aug 02 2011 at 4:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
Monsieur Spoonless wrote:
Smiley: lol Oh, Christ, the novelty of being called an idiot by the likes of Alma. Smiley: lolSmiley: lol

It gets old pretty fast. Smiley: grin
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#171Almalieque, Posted: Aug 02 2011 at 5:11 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I wasn't talking about a specific person, you idiot. The fact that there were people debating that is enough to prove my point. The fact thatNO ONE SAID ANYTHING. Even in this very own thread... There were much worse sexist comments, other than what Varus said.
#172Almalieque, Posted: Aug 02 2011 at 5:16 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I stopped here.
#173 Aug 02 2011 at 5:33 PM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Kachi wrote:
Sorry, but Alma is one of the most interesting people on the forum.
I don't think that word means what you think it means, and if it does, it probably says more about how bland you consider everyone else to be.
#174 Aug 02 2011 at 5:33 PM Rating: Good
When has anyone ever used the phrase "shelled out some money" in a positive way...?
#175 Aug 02 2011 at 5:37 PM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
zukunftsangst wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Allegory wrote:
I think Alma blunders because he doesn't realize just how apparent some of his mistakes are, and believes by maintaining a certain stance he can hide them from others.
Bigger problem is if he is an officer, then he's surrounded by people that are obligated to agree with him regardless. Most of us have to listen to officers go on and on about whatever and have to smile and nod, and when they leave we get to go and either do the mission that the officer had no idea how to complete done correctly, or just go to a gym and exercise the frustration of the idiocy away.

It's really sad.


Short of seeking citizenship or the most severe economic desperation, I don't see why anyone with a decent amount of intelligence would join the military. No offense, but I don't fire the benefits to outweigh the risks, trauma and drudgery.

Edited, Aug 2nd 2011 6:32pm by zukunftsangst


It's ALL worth it. I can only speak from my personal experiences, but the benefits heavily outweigh the cons.
#176Almalieque, Posted: Aug 02 2011 at 5:41 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I just use it as an expression. I never put any thought if it were "positive" or "negative".
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 229 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (229)