- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Legalized Prostitution?
Legalized Prostitution?Follow
Also, that time you spent growing up developing social skills? You're totally paying for sex if you use them to attract a woman.
RAWDEAL wrote:
Legalizing prostitution is a great way to pay for college tuition, frat house turn in brothel.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/29/seeking-arrangement-college-students_n_913373.html
Actually, more common, are sorority girls who get paid to help "recruit" potential athletes.
And Locke, it's misogyny spurred by constant rejection of the opposite sex. If no girl will ever sleep with you under any circumstances, you have to justify it to yourself somehow. The "All girls need to be courted and bought things and committed to before they even have sex with you, and I'm just above that" is a paperbag defense that helps Alma fall asleep at night after he jerks off alone.
Guenny wrote:
And Locke, it's misogyny spurred by constant rejection of the opposite sex. If no girl will ever sleep with you under any circumstances, you have to justify it to yourself somehow. The "All girls need to be courted and bought things and committed to before they even have sex with you, and I'm just above that" is a paperbag defense that helps Alma fall asleep at night after he jerks off alone.
That could be it. I've had "dry spells" in my life where I went for several months without doing the horizontal tango, but I've never had the feeling of "Oh, this will never happen again." I actually find the opposite: the more I worry about it, the less likely I am to meet a girl. If I had failed at most of my attempts at relationships, I could see myself getting into a funk as well. I have a friend from high school who had that happen; and since college he's mostly been apathetic toward the dating game, insisting "I'm just not interested in dating." On the plus side, he's not a misogynist when it comes to his comments
Chances are that Alma is also a mamma's boy and unfortunately no other woman can compare to her splendor.
Guenny wrote:
Chances are that Alma is also a mamma's boy and unfortunately no other woman can compare to her splendor.
I done heard she be ugly.
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
That's not a rumor, Joph, that's science.
It's very sexist to make fun of something someone has no control over, like mutations.
Sexist, I tell ya.
Sexist, I tell ya.
I didn't know old married people still had sex. With each other, I mean.
******* gross.
Ten + years of continued gurning, lethargic thrusting, geriatric scented sweat, half audible groans formed by toothless mouths, the awkward silence as they drift back to their separate beds and repent to the lord.
I have the weirdest ***** right now
******* gross.
Ten + years of continued gurning, lethargic thrusting, geriatric scented sweat, half audible groans formed by toothless mouths, the awkward silence as they drift back to their separate beds and repent to the lord.
I have the weirdest ***** right now
varusword75 wrote:
I aint sayin she's a gold digger but she aint f*ckin w/a broke n*gga.
Oh come now, if he was hung like a horse, even YOU'D break the racial barrier for a chance at that.
I don't know what's worse, Varus quoting a Kanye West song or me recognizing it as such.
Huh. I really don't remember going to dinner or a movie or anywhere the first time I had sex with my husband. But I must have, since varus said so. Wow, so glad you're here to tell me these things.
varusword75 wrote:
Nads,
Had he ever taken you out before that? How many dinners did it take before you let him hit that? Or are you, as I suspect, just trailer trash and f*cked him the first day he wandered down from his part of the trailer park?
Quote:
Huh. I really don't remember going to dinner or a movie or anywhere the first time I had sex with my husband
Had he ever taken you out before that? How many dinners did it take before you let him hit that? Or are you, as I suspect, just trailer trash and f*cked him the first day he wandered down from his part of the trailer park?
Alma, I hope it makes you feel good to have this moron agreeing with you. And maybe you'll understand why some of us think you're a misogynist.
LockeColeMA wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
The simple fact that you have yet addressed the other half of my self-proclaimed contradiction is evident that you're not trying to "help" at all. You're merely using the straw man to insult. That's fine with me, just own up to it. You don't have to do it publicly, just realize it.
?
I'm telling you how you come across. There's no "other half" to it. You come across as a misogynist. That includes everything you've said.
Edit: Again, it might not be misogyny. It's just as likely that you cannot understand how other people think or feel. As said, it's likely a mental disorder, and as such can be treated (hopefully). Until you do, it will likely affect all your relationships. You can blame it on other things, like girls liking bad boys, or women being creatures that only put out when enough money is invested... but really, there's a pattern here that you should see. WOULD see if it were anyone but yourself.
Edited, Aug 2nd 2011 11:58am by LockeColeMA
The fact that you insist that there isn't any other half, when I clearly opened the topic with two distinct view points is evident that you're full of BS.
There's no disorder or anything wrong with me. You're simply using straw man arguments in support of "cyber bullying" me into believing that there is something wrong with me.
Let me break it down for you. I presented two thoughts (thought 1 and thought 2) that contradicted each other. You presented a thought (thought 3) that also contradicted thought 2.What is it the most likely relationship between thought 1 and thought 3?
That's how I know you're full of BS... unless... that is..... you're the one with the mental disorder and don't realize it? If so, I can help you out. I can google some help for you...
Belkira wrote:
You keep saying that if a man wants to have sex with a woman, he has to pay in some way (either a prostitute or via a relationship). I'm saying that there are women who will have sex with a man without that. You accept that, then say that the fact that those women exist proves your point...
That's just backwards.
2 Reasons.
1. I was referring to whores and sluts. Just because a woman will have sex with a man without him needing to shell out money, doesn't make her a *****. How sexist of you to think otherwise.
2. I've clarified numerous times that my comment was a financial counter to the belief that prostitution is wrong because a man shouldn't ever have to open his wallet to have sex. I know what I said and I understand how you INITIALLY perceived it, but I clarified that numerous of times now. So, if you insist on believing your claim, then you're simply in denial.
Nad wrote:
Alma apparently takes women out, pays for everything and STILL gets none.
Learn to read?
Spoon wrote:
Also, that time you spent growing up developing social skills? You're totally paying for sex if you use them to attract a woman.
Learn to read? and not be an idiot?
Guenny wrote:
And Locke, it's misogyny spurred by constant rejection of the opposite sex. If no girl will ever sleep with you under any circumstances, you have to justify it to yourself somehow. The "All girls need to be courted and bought things and committed to before they even have sex with you, and I'm just above that"
Learn to read? not be an idiot? and pretend to be knowledgeable?
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Nads,
Had he ever taken you out before that? How many dinners did it take before you let him hit that? Or are you, as I suspect, just trailer trash and f*cked him the first day he wandered down from his part of the trailer park?
Quote:
Huh. I really don't remember going to dinner or a movie or anywhere the first time I had sex with my husband
Had he ever taken you out before that? How many dinners did it take before you let him hit that? Or are you, as I suspect, just trailer trash and f*cked him the first day he wandered down from his part of the trailer park?
Alma, I hope it makes you feel good to have this moron agreeing with you. And maybe you'll understand why some of us think you're a misogynist.
Admittedly I was afraid of that, but after reading his comments, we don't agree. He's doing nothing more than what you do to me, argue the opposite.
Oh, Christ, the novelty of being called an idiot by the likes of Alma. varusword75 wrote:
Tulip,
I aint sayin she's a gold digger but she aint f*ckin w/a broke n*gga.
Sad to say once you get out of high school and start dating in the real world decent women expect to be treated a certain way; and that generally doesn't include them treating the guy.
They're called sluts and whores and then you're just rolling the dice with your d*ck praying you don't crap out.
American women like Tulip and Nads can delude themselves all they like the fact is some guy took them out to dinner and they boned him in return. It's the whole american princess syndrome that's completely f*cked up american womens attitude towards sex.
That said all relationships are investments in time and money. There's no gettting around it. If you don't want a relationship but like sex i'd suggest an escort.
Has no one else here visited the red-light district in amsterdam? Wild fun times back then.
Quote:
You keep saying that if a man wants to have sex with a woman, he has to pay in some way (either a prostitute or via a relationship).
I aint sayin she's a gold digger but she aint f*ckin w/a broke n*gga.
Sad to say once you get out of high school and start dating in the real world decent women expect to be treated a certain way; and that generally doesn't include them treating the guy.
Quote:
I'm saying that there are women who will have sex with a man without that.
They're called sluts and whores and then you're just rolling the dice with your d*ck praying you don't crap out.
American women like Tulip and Nads can delude themselves all they like the fact is some guy took them out to dinner and they boned him in return. It's the whole american princess syndrome that's completely f*cked up american womens attitude towards sex.
That said all relationships are investments in time and money. There's no gettting around it. If you don't want a relationship but like sex i'd suggest an escort.
Has no one else here visited the red-light district in amsterdam? Wild fun times back then.
Sounds like a skill issue, bruh. I can see why you became a bumder. Just remember it's a small town, yeah it's a real small town. I can't say that I've ever gotten the impression that the women I've been with have particularly whorish. Beyond what they'd have to be to sleep with me, of course.
Notably I've never had any luck (IE no smashing of guts was had) with the girls I've spent money on or taken an active interest in, yet the girls I've been indifferent and occasionally hostile to have generally become obsessed with me. ******* female mind, how does it work?
Almalieque wrote:
2 Reasons.
1. I was referring to whores and sluts. Just because a woman will have sex with a man without him needing to shell out money, doesn't make her a *****. How sexist of you to think otherwise.
2. I've clarified numerous times that my comment was a financial counter to the belief that prostitution is wrong because a man shouldn't ever have to open his wallet to have sex. I know what I said and I understand how you INITIALLY perceived it, but I clarified that numerous of times now. So, if you insist on believing your claim, then you're simply in denial.
1. I was referring to whores and sluts. Just because a woman will have sex with a man without him needing to shell out money, doesn't make her a *****. How sexist of you to think otherwise.
2. I've clarified numerous times that my comment was a financial counter to the belief that prostitution is wrong because a man shouldn't ever have to open his wallet to have sex. I know what I said and I understand how you INITIALLY perceived it, but I clarified that numerous of times now. So, if you insist on believing your claim, then you're simply in denial.
1. I have no idea what you're talking about... I never once said that a woman is a ***** if she has sex with a man without needing money "shelled out" for her. Though your choice of words once again shows your true feelings about women.
2. This does absolutely nothing to disprove that you're essentially saying that a man has to pay for sex either via a prostitute, or through a relationship.
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
2 Reasons.
1. I was referring to whores and sluts. Just because a woman will have sex with a man without him needing to shell out money, doesn't make her a *****. How sexist of you to think otherwise.
2. I've clarified numerous times that my comment was a financial counter to the belief that prostitution is wrong because a man shouldn't ever have to open his wallet to have sex. I know what I said and I understand how you INITIALLY perceived it, but I clarified that numerous of times now. So, if you insist on believing your claim, then you're simply in denial.
1. I was referring to whores and sluts. Just because a woman will have sex with a man without him needing to shell out money, doesn't make her a *****. How sexist of you to think otherwise.
2. I've clarified numerous times that my comment was a financial counter to the belief that prostitution is wrong because a man shouldn't ever have to open his wallet to have sex. I know what I said and I understand how you INITIALLY perceived it, but I clarified that numerous of times now. So, if you insist on believing your claim, then you're simply in denial.
1. I have no idea what you're talking about... I never once said that a woman is a ***** if she has sex with a man without needing money "shelled out" for her. Though your choice of words once again shows your true feelings about women.
2. This does absolutely nothing to disprove that you're essentially saying that a man has to pay for sex either via a prostitute, or through a relationship.
1. a The women that exist to prove my point, were in reference to whores and sluts. I said that the simple fact that those words exist and have different meanings other than a person, male or female who has casual sex for no real reason other sexual satisfaction, proves my point that they it isn't typical.
What I agreed to is that sex can occur with minimal to no money spent. Those two are unrelated, but you presented them as if I were discussing the same *type* of women.
1. b. It's official, You have problems. If you think the term "shell out" in referencing to spending money is any way "sexist" then you simply have problems. That is all there is to it.
2. It does, because once again, I presented two contradicting thoughts. You decided to attack one and ignore the other. If you actually addressed the other thought, the one Locke insists on ignoring, you would realize how silly you two along with Spoon looks.
Then again, with the mental disorders you all have, I'm sure that you don't even realize it.
varusword75 wrote:
Nads,
Had he ever taken you out before that? How many dinners did it take before you let him hit that? Or are you, as I suspect, just trailer trash and f*cked him the first day he wandered down from his part of the trailer park?
Quote:
Huh. I really don't remember going to dinner or a movie or anywhere the first time I had sex with my husband
Had he ever taken you out before that? How many dinners did it take before you let him hit that? Or are you, as I suspect, just trailer trash and f*cked him the first day he wandered down from his part of the trailer park?
Actually, no. We had never been out before that night. See, I feel like women can sleep with anyone they want to, just like men, and not be sluts for it.
We went on our first real date probably a week later.
Maybe one day you'll get lucky enough to find a woman you don't have to bribe into bed, but I doubt it.
Guenny wrote:
Alma fall asleep at night after he jerks off alone.
Hey, that's not fair.. the thought of Belkira scissoring her friend didn't get to you?
Almalieque wrote:
1. a The women that exist to prove my point, were in reference to whores and sluts. I said that the simple fact that those words exist and have different meanings other than a person, male or female who has casual sex for no real reason other sexual satisfaction, proves my point that they it isn't typical.
So you're calling me a ****.
Don't ever tell anyone one of us that we shouldn't resort to name calling.
Dumbass.
Monsieur Spoonless wrote:
It's like Alma doesn't even acknowledge women's sex drives. Just because they're not trying to get laid every night doesn't mean they don't like frequent sex.
yeah... this. I mean, for serious, this.
Why won't you whores answer my question?
Recent Visitors: 234
All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (234)
- Forums
- Cross Site
- The Asylum
- Legalized Prostitution?
© 2024 Fanbyte LLC