Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Legalized Prostitution?Follow

#102Almalieque, Posted: Aug 02 2011 at 8:02 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) OMG, you're an idiot. Do you even know what prostitution is? How is going on a date, splitting half the bill considered prostitution? Go educate yourself.
#103 Aug 02 2011 at 8:08 AM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
It's funny because you contradict yourself in two halves of the same post. Smiley: laugh
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#104 Aug 02 2011 at 8:10 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Nilatai wrote:
It's funny because you contradict yourself in two halves of the same post. Smiley: laugh


Learn to read?
#105 Aug 02 2011 at 8:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Alma is a scary, sad little man.

And like has already been stated, it's no wonder he's single.

#106 Aug 02 2011 at 8:33 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Nadenu wrote:
Nadenu wrote:
Alma is a scary, sad little man.

And like has already been stated, it's no wonder he's single.



By choice, but I wont be when I come back from the sand box.. No point in going there with a relationship that doesn't have a solid foundation to withstand a deployment.

Ask LolGaxe, I'm sure he's heard many stories of ruined relationships. That last thing I want is unnecessary drama.
#107 Aug 02 2011 at 8:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Almalieque wrote:
She said the average woman isn't going to go home with a complete stranger just because you asked for sex.


For the record, I never said that. Here's the exchange where you inferred that:

Belkira wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Belkira wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
On the other hand, I do realize that you're paying for it regardless...


And it gets better from there. And it's not like I'm the only one who picked up on it...


How is that sexist? Are you implying that women have sex with complete strangers without at least trying to know the person?


Nope.



All I said was that was not what I was implying with my particular post. Of course women have sex with complete strangers without trying to get to know them. It happens all the time.

For someone who likes to cry about people not understanding you or misstating your posts, you do it a lot yourself.
#108 Aug 02 2011 at 8:37 AM Rating: Decent
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
She said the average woman isn't going to go home with a complete stranger just because you asked for sex.


For the record, I never said that. Here's the exchange where you inferred that:

Belkira wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Belkira wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
On the other hand, I do realize that you're paying for it regardless...


And it gets better from there. And it's not like I'm the only one who picked up on it...


How is that sexist? Are you implying that women have sex with complete strangers without at least trying to know the person?


Nope.



All I said was that was not what I was implying with my particular post. Of course women have sex with complete strangers without trying to get to know them. It happens all the time.

For someone who likes to cry about people not understanding you or misstating your posts, you do it a lot yourself.



Except the difference is that I admit to it. I misunderstood your post, now will say the same? Probably not.

I already agreed that one night stands occur, that's a reality, I know that.

The fact still remains that a man is not likely to have sex with a woman by simply saying "hey, let's go have sex". Although, these things happen, they are not the norm.
#109 Aug 02 2011 at 8:40 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Look Alma, it doesn't matter to us what you think of yourself. To everyone else on this forum, and likely the world at large, you come off as a misogynist. You can cry to the high heavens about how it's completely wrong - but that's how you come off. Instead of insisting you're right, maybe you should try to see yourself like everyone else does. I'm honestly afraid you have a mental disorder that makes you unable to empathize with others (antisocial disorder? Not positive if that's the right one).

Saying stuff like "You always pay for sex" just isn't something a normal person says, even if it's "true." No one thinks in those terms unless they are extremely cynical or full of hatred toward the opposite sex. Or potentially a robot.
#110 Aug 02 2011 at 8:41 AM Rating: Excellent
Almalieque wrote:
The fact still remains that a man is not likely to have sex with a woman by simply saying "hey, let's go have sex". Although, these things happen, they are not the norm.


If that wasn't the norm, then we wouldn't have words for promiscuous girls like "*****" and "****."

There may be women who don't do it, but there are plenty of women who do. Just like, though I'm sure you'll say I'm wrong, there are men who are not into one night stands.
#111 Aug 02 2011 at 8:43 AM Rating: Good
LockeColeMA wrote:
I'm honestly afraid you have a mental disorder that makes you unable to empathize with others (antisocial disorder? Not positive if that's the right one).


Sociopath...?
#112 Aug 02 2011 at 8:44 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
I'm honestly afraid you have a mental disorder that makes you unable to empathize with others (antisocial disorder? Not positive if that's the right one).


Sociopath...?


I think it's psychopathy.

Edited, Aug 2nd 2011 10:44am by Eske
#113 Aug 02 2011 at 8:44 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
LockeColeMA wrote:
Look Alma, it doesn't matter to us what you think of yourself. To everyone else on this forum, and likely the world at large, you come off as a misogynist.

Are there many misogynists who openly admit it?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#114 Aug 02 2011 at 8:49 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
I'm honestly afraid you have a mental disorder that makes you unable to empathize with others (antisocial disorder? Not positive if that's the right one).


Sociopath...?

Sociopath I believe is they can't have feelings of guilt. Not positive; my last psych class was half a decade ago.
#115 Aug 02 2011 at 9:13 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
Look Alma, it doesn't matter to us what you think of yourself. To everyone else on this forum, and likely the world at large, you come off as a misogynist. You can cry to the high heavens about how it's completely wrong - but that's how you come off. Instead of insisting you're right, maybe you should try to see yourself like everyone else does. I'm honestly afraid you have a mental disorder that makes you unable to empathize with others (antisocial disorder? Not positive if that's the right one).

Saying stuff like "You always pay for sex" just isn't something a normal person says, even if it's "true." No one thinks in those terms unless they are extremely cynical or full of hatred toward the opposite sex. Or potentially a robot.


I clarified myself numerous times now. So, if for whatever reason, you believe the nonsense crap you just spouted, once again, that isn't fault of mine. It was a counter to the belief that prostitution is wrong because you shouldn't have to open your wallet for sex. You do have to open your wallet and EVERYONE says that, that's how you have that "buying the cow" expression.

So, if you want to insult me, then fine. IDGAF, but don't expect me to live in fantasy land believing the stuff you say just because this forum likes to say it.

You or anyone else, has yet pointed out anything that supports your claim of me being a misogynist other than diverting the subject into fictitious arguments.

The bottom line is, you all make stuff up and argue that as if I made those claims. I never called or implied that women were money hungry or whores. I made a financial counter to my OWN belief of not wanting to pay for something that you could get for "free"..

Instead of taking in the entire picture, you all literally harped on ONE HALF of my own self-proclaimed contradiction as an argument and then added irrelevant stuff to it.

What about the other half?


So, you can pretend all you want that that I'm delusional or whatever, but the reality is, you, along with many others, rely on the straw man to win arguments.



Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
The fact still remains that a man is not likely to have sex with a woman by simply saying "hey, let's go have sex". Although, these things happen, they are not the norm.


If that wasn't the norm, then we wouldn't have words for promiscuous girls like "*****" and "****."

There may be women who don't do it, but there are plenty of women who do. Just like, though I'm sure you'll say I'm wrong, there are men who are not into one night stands.


The fact that those words exist, is evident of my claim. Else, woman and ***** would be synonymous, but they aren't. Instead of having words to describe whores and sluts, there would be words to describe sexually conservative women. I'm not saying that they don't exist, but they would be more popular.

I learned a correction from over the years. It's not that women are more/less sexual than men, it's that overall, women aren't as likely to ACT on their sexual urges as a male would. Women tend to value their self image more so than a male. Calling a male a ***** or a **** doesn't hold the same value as calling a woman those same words.

Many guys brag about how many women he's been with. A certain percentage of men measure their "manliness" by the amount of women he's been with.
Men are made fun of for being a virgin or having few partners. The list goes on... It's a double standard and to pretend otherwise is just silly.
#116 Aug 02 2011 at 9:23 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Almalieque wrote:
So, if you want to insult me, then fine. IDGAF, but don't expect me to live in fantasy land believing the stuff you say just because this forum likes to say it.

I'm not insulting you. I'm telling you, plainly, how you come across. You ranting like that really isn't changing that. The more you post, the more obvious it is that you don't care nor understand how other people think, only that you feel right in your own mind. All of us have ego to a certain point, but there's a great difference between ego and lacking basic empathy. Each time you post, it seems you're in the latter.

Look, it's not tough. Go see a mental health professional. Many people will take that as a sign of weakness, but 50% of people will be diagnosed with a mental disorder sometime in their lives. There's no shame in having one; there is in not trying to get help for it.

I'm actually trying to be helpful here. Granted, I'm being an ******* too, since I could send this in PM but instead am posting in a public forum. But just because I like being a jerk doesn't mean you don't need help.
#117 Aug 02 2011 at 9:40 AM Rating: Excellent
Almalieque wrote:
The fact that those words exist, is evident of my claim. Else, woman and ***** would be synonymous, but they aren't. Instead of having words to describe whores and sluts, there would be words to describe sexually conservative women. I'm not saying that they don't exist, but they would be more popular.


Smiley: facepalm

Your logic is so twisted.

Almalieque wrote:
I learned a correction from over the years. It's not that women are more/less sexual than men, it's that overall, women aren't as likely to ACT on their sexual urges as a male would. Women tend to value their self image more so than a male. Calling a male a ***** or a **** doesn't hold the same value as calling a woman those same words.

Many guys brag about how many women he's been with. A certain percentage of men measure their "manliness" by the amount of women he's been with.
Men are made fun of for being a virgin or having few partners. The list goes on... It's a double standard and to pretend otherwise is just silly.


None of that really has anything to do with anything.
#118 Aug 02 2011 at 9:42 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Almalieque wrote:
Instead of having words to describe whores and sluts, there would be words to describe sexually conservative women. I'm not saying that they don't exist, but they would be more popular.

When did "prude" become some esoteric word?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#119 Aug 02 2011 at 9:46 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
So, if you want to insult me, then fine. IDGAF, but don't expect me to live in fantasy land believing the stuff you say just because this forum likes to say it.

I'm not insulting you. I'm telling you, plainly, how you come across. You ranting like that really isn't changing that. The more you post, the more obvious it is that you don't care nor understand how other people think, only that you feel right in your own mind. All of us have ego to a certain point, but there's a great difference between ego and lacking basic empathy. Each time you post, it seems you're in the latter.

Look, it's not tough. Go see a mental health professional. Many people will take that as a sign of weakness, but 50% of people will be diagnosed with a mental disorder sometime in their lives. There's no shame in having one; there is in not trying to get help for it.

I'm actually trying to be helpful here. Granted, I'm being an @#%^ too, since I could send this in PM but instead am posting in a public forum. But just because I like being a jerk doesn't mean you don't need help.


Almalieque wrote:

What about the other half?


The simple fact that you have yet addressed the other half of my self-proclaimed contradiction is evident that you're not trying to "help" at all. You're merely using the straw man to insult. That's fine with me, just own up to it. You don't have to do it publicly, just realize it.

That's my help for you.
#120 Aug 02 2011 at 9:52 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Belkira wrote:

Your logic is so twisted.


How so?

I say the same about you. What makes me wrong and you right?

Belkira wrote:
None of that really has anything to do with anything.


Belkira wrote:

No, Spoonless. Women don't want to have sex like men do. Didn't you know that...?


Spoon wrote:
It's like Alma doesn't even acknowledge women's sex drives. Just because they're not trying to get laid every night doesn't mean they don't like frequent sex.
#121 Aug 02 2011 at 9:54 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Almalieque wrote:
The simple fact that you have yet addressed the other half of my self-proclaimed contradiction is evident that you're not trying to "help" at all. You're merely using the straw man to insult. That's fine with me, just own up to it. You don't have to do it publicly, just realize it.

?

I'm telling you how you come across. There's no "other half" to it. You come across as a misogynist. That includes everything you've said.

Edit: Again, it might not be misogyny. It's just as likely that you cannot understand how other people think or feel. As said, it's likely a mental disorder, and as such can be treated (hopefully). Until you do, it will likely affect all your relationships. You can blame it on other things, like girls liking bad boys, or women being creatures that only put out when enough money is invested... but really, there's a pattern here that you should see. WOULD see if it were anyone but yourself.

Edited, Aug 2nd 2011 11:58am by LockeColeMA
#122 Aug 02 2011 at 9:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Almalieque wrote:
Belkira wrote:

Your logic is so twisted.


How so?

I say the same about you. What makes me wrong and you right?


You keep saying that if a man wants to have sex with a woman, he has to pay in some way (either a prostitute or via a relationship). I'm saying that there are women who will have sex with a man without that. You accept that, then say that the fact that those women exist proves your point...

That's just backwards.
#123 Aug 02 2011 at 10:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Alma apparently takes women out, pays for everything and STILL gets none.
#124 Aug 02 2011 at 11:00 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
That explains his interest in legalizing prostitution.

Too bad it'll probably still be against UCMJ.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#125 Aug 02 2011 at 11:31 AM Rating: Default
Legalizing prostitution is a great way to pay for college tuition, frat house turn in brothel.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/07/29/seeking-arrangement-college-students_n_913373.html
#126 Aug 02 2011 at 11:56 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,251 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
Belkira wrote:

Your logic is so twisted.


How so?

I say the same about you. What makes me wrong and you right?


You keep saying that if a man wants to have sex with a woman, he has to pay in some way (either a prostitute or via a relationship). I'm saying that there are women who will have sex with a man without that. You accept that, then say that the fact that those women exist proves your point...

That's just backwards.
No, don't you get it? Since a man typically has to expend more energy than it takes to ask "want to have sex?" In order to get laid, he's paying for sex in some manner. In fact, if he even has to make the suggestion to have sex, you could argue that he's had to pay in some way.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 329 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (329)