Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Legalized Prostitution?Follow

#227 Aug 03 2011 at 9:59 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
10,802 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Nads,

American men aren't marrying american women because american women are by and large selfish self-centered whores who are willing to drop their man at the mere hint of a better alternative.

The statistics are there. Nearly 70% of american marriages between an american man and woman end in divorce. And of those divorces nearly 75% are initiated by the woman. On the other hand agencies that are set up to marry american men to foreign women have a nearly 75% success rate.

Feminism has absolutely destroyed the traditional family with the help of big brother.

I have two girls I could ask to marry me today and they would. Why should I? Because I have some imaginary fantasy about a mytho-poetic storybook romance that's been force fed to american society the last 50yrs?

Nah...I think i'll pull a Jophed and find a nice little south american hotty who has yet to be americanized into thinking men are sh*t.



Link to your statistics please?

And with your posts, there's no wonder that my Filipino *** finds you, as an American man, a sh*t.

Edit: Quote fail.

Edited, Aug 3rd 2011 9:28am by Thumbelyna
#228 Aug 03 2011 at 10:00 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
Well, if you're going to be making use of the extra power frequently, it could be worth it. But, if you're just going to need it once or twice a year, you'd probably save money in the long run just renting a more powerful truck for a day when you need it.
#229 Aug 03 2011 at 10:01 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
The stats from the CDC site say the divorce rate is around 50% of the marriage rate.
#230 Aug 03 2011 at 10:03 AM Rating: Excellent
Monsieur Spoonless wrote:
The stats from the CDC site say the divorce rate is around 50% of the marriage rate.

But what % of those are American Men married to American Women? See? Huh? You can't discount his made-up statistics because he qualified it! BAM!
#231 Aug 03 2011 at 10:06 AM Rating: Default
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
Monsieur Spoonless wrote:
Well, if you're going to be making use of the extra power frequently, it could be worth it. But, if you're just going to need it once or twice a year, you'd probably save money in the long run just renting a more powerful truck for a day when you need it.


I wont. I really just want the space. I never really need it until I need it... Then I wish I had a large truck.. I'll probably just find something with a large bed.
#232REDACTED, Posted: Aug 03 2011 at 10:18 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) lagaga,
#233 Aug 03 2011 at 10:19 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Gumbo Galahad wrote:
Says the guy who can't shut up about them.
Turning you on too much? Would you like me to stop so you can sit properly?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#234 Aug 03 2011 at 10:24 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
13,251 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
Monsieur Spoonless wrote:
The stats from the CDC site say the divorce rate is around 50% of the marriage rate.

But what % of those are American Men married to American Women? See? Huh? You can't discount his made-up statistics because he qualified it! BAM!
Plus, 50% is closer to 70% than it is to 0%, so I guess it is "nearly" 70%.

FOILED AGAIN!
#235 Aug 03 2011 at 10:28 AM Rating: Good
Tricksy varus is false. Tricksy and false. We hates the varus.
#236 Aug 03 2011 at 10:30 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
No reply to my comment. I guess a relationship that works doesn't fit into his diabolical plans.
#237REDACTED, Posted: Aug 03 2011 at 10:48 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Moe,
#238 Aug 03 2011 at 10:51 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
That's not how statistics work.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#239REDACTED, Posted: Aug 03 2011 at 10:52 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Nads,
#240 Aug 03 2011 at 11:02 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
varusword75 wrote:


American women were taught


The problem...
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#241 Aug 03 2011 at 11:04 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
varusword75 wrote:
American women were taught by the radical feminists that it doesn't matter what they look like as long as they're a "good" person on the inside. Of course they were lied to because no one likes a fat as*...well except for hot italian women.

I don't think you know what you're arguing here. You bring up divorce statistics as well as saying American women aren't being married. So which is the problem? American chicks aren't getting married, or aren't staying married?
#242 Aug 03 2011 at 11:07 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Think I found Varus's "source"
Quote:
"According to data supplied by the U.S. Census Bureau, there were
2,395,000 marriages in the U.S. in the 12 months ending June, 1997 (and
1,154,000 divorces in the same period). The 4,000 to 6,000 marriages
involving international services represent, then, a tiny portion (.021
percent) of the women who marry U.S. men.

It is interesting to note that, based largely on data provided by the
agencies themselves (along with the Commission on Filipinos Overseas
report cited above), marriages arranged through these services would
appear to have a much lower divorce rate than the nation as a whole,
fully 80 percent of these marriages having lasted over the years for
which reports are available."

The divorce rate for American men who marry American women: 57%
(officially). But since the figures from several states (including
California) are excluded, the true national divorce rate is likely
closer to 65%. The divorce rate in California is over 70%.

Read more: http://www.city-data.com/forum/relationships/1222443-divorce-rate-exponentially-higher-american-men.html#ixzz1TzDni5eR


Golf clap for taking a 12 month period from almost 15 years ago and making definitive statements? Smiley: dubious

Edit: Even the comments on the site make fun of this:
Quote:
Here's the error in a nutshell.

In 2010, 100 people got married.
In 2010, 65 people got divorced.
Conclusion: The divorce rate is 65%.

Except it's not. Most of those 65 people did not marry in 2010, so you're not comparing the same groups.


Edited, Aug 3rd 2011 1:08pm by LockeColeMA
#243 Aug 03 2011 at 11:12 AM Rating: Good
*****
13,251 posts
You really think that the divorce rate relative to the marriage rate across the states of California, Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Louisiana and Minnesota is going to be high enough to push the national ratio above 60%? Really? Smiley: lol
#244 Aug 03 2011 at 11:27 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Nads,

So in the 3 years you were dating how much would you guestimate he spent on you?


No idea. I don't worry about stuff like that. And I'd say he spent no more than I did.
#245 Aug 03 2011 at 11:30 AM Rating: Excellent
Nadenu wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Nads,

So in the 3 years you were dating how much would you guestimate he spent on you?


No idea. I don't worry about stuff like that. And I'd say he spent no more than I did.


While we dated, my husband didn't have a job, let alone money to spend on me. He even moved into my apartment rent free.

Good thing he's a good lay. Smiley: wink
#246REDACTED, Posted: Aug 03 2011 at 11:35 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Locked,
#247REDACTED, Posted: Aug 03 2011 at 11:40 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Tulip,
#248 Aug 03 2011 at 11:43 AM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
So either money grubbing or ugly and desperate. That explains a lot. Smiley: laugh
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#249 Aug 03 2011 at 11:58 AM Rating: Excellent
varusword75 wrote:
Tulip,

Quote:
While we dated, my husband didn't have a job, let alone money to spend on me.


You asked him out and paid for everything because you're an ugly ***** who was grateful for his attention.



Actually, my husband had a crush on me since the sixth grade. He asked me "out" ("come visit me at college") and we hit it off. I'm happy to pay for a night out to spend it with someone interesting and fun.
#250REDACTED, Posted: Aug 03 2011 at 12:04 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Tulip,
#251 Aug 03 2011 at 12:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Tulip,

Quote:
While we dated, my husband didn't have a job, let alone money to spend on me.


You asked him out and paid for everything because you're an ugly ***** who was grateful for his attention.



Actually, my husband had a crush on me since the sixth grade. He asked me "out" ("come visit me at college") and we hit it off. I'm happy to pay for a night out to spend it with someone interesting and fun.

Psst, varus - that means she wouldn't want to pay for a night out with you.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 351 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (351)