Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
Guenny wrote:
The discussion at hand is for people who use it for medicinal purposes. Even if marijuana were "legalized", people who pedaled drugs out of their house without a license would still get in trouble.
Ah, I thought the bill was just about legalizing it in general, not for medicinal purposes.
Aren't they a bit conflated anyway, though? I feel like the two debates are often used interchangeably, even by pot advocates. I feel like both sides have lent credibility to the idea that the legalization of medical marijuana is just a stepping stone to full legalization.
I think that's partly because the whole medical marijuana thing in CA is so ridiculous. You can go to a doctor and get a MM card so easily, so marijuana might as well be legal for recreational use.
I've heard that too, though I can't remember the specifics about it. If anyone could clue me in, that'd be cool.