From How We Are Geo Engineering the Planet.
Professor Mike Sandiford wrote:
"The largest earthquake in Victoria in the last 30 years was the magnitude five Thomson Dam quake, induced as a direct consequence of the filling of the Thomson dam.
Induced quakes are a common occurrence when we first fill large dams, with the largest record being a magnitude six quake in India."
Induced quakes are a common occurrence when we first fill large dams, with the largest record being a magnitude six quake in India."
I wonder if Dam earthquakes would be avoided if dams were purposely filled at a much slower rate over time. IE, are Dam quakes a consequence of a rapid change over time in where a large mass of stuff in the Earth's crust is? Or whether the quakes is a consequence of the change in place in where a large mass of stuff in the crust is, and therefore unavoidable given the choice to fill a dam there?
Edited, Jun 18th 2011 3:59pm by Aripyanfar