Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Filling large dams causes earthquakes.Follow

#1 Jun 18 2011 at 1:55 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,952 posts
I did not know this.

From How We Are Geo Engineering the Planet.

Professor Mike Sandiford wrote:
"The largest earthquake in Victoria in the last 30 years was the magnitude five Thomson Dam quake, induced as a direct consequence of the filling of the Thomson dam.

Induced quakes are a common occurrence when we first fill large dams, with the largest record being a magnitude six quake in India."


I wonder if Dam earthquakes would be avoided if dams were purposely filled at a much slower rate over time. IE, are Dam quakes a consequence of a rapid change over time in where a large mass of stuff in the Earth's crust is? Or whether the quakes is a consequence of the change in place in where a large mass of stuff in the crust is, and therefore unavoidable given the choice to fill a dam there?

Edited, Jun 18th 2011 3:59pm by Aripyanfar
#2 Jun 18 2011 at 3:44 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
Probably a combination of both. You also have to consider the drying time of the cement and project timetables.

I also saw a blurb somewhere about how the Three Gorges Dam in China has altered the Earth's rotation, with the amount of cement in the dam itself and the size of the subsequent lake, on top of the crust at that altitude.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#3 Jun 18 2011 at 4:35 PM Rating: Default
Thomson Dam in actions-have-reactions shocker.
#4 Jun 18 2011 at 10:41 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Think of it like a board suspended between two sawhorses. If you drop a heavy load on it quickly, it will break quickly. If you set that same load on it gently, it might still break, or it might not. Either way you are still adding strain to the area, and even if that doesn't break there, the tension has to go somewhere. Plate tectonics wasn't even a theory when most of the pacific northwest dams were under construction.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#5 Jun 18 2011 at 11:21 PM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Obviously I'm not a seismologist, but the answer seems fairly obvious. Earthquakes are the results of massive movements occurring on the mantle. Fillings dams isn't causing them so much as setting them off. Thus, it's largely unavoidable. Additionally, filling of a dam typically takes around a year, maybe a few years for larger dams. Any slowing of the process would have to be of a significantly higher magnitude to make a difference. Decades, minimally.

Edited, Jun 19th 2011 12:21am by Allegory
#6 Jun 20 2011 at 6:23 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Allegory wrote:
Obviously I'm not a seismologist, but the answer seems fairly obvious. Earthquakes are the results of massive movements occurring on the mantle. Fillings dams isn't causing them so much as setting them off. Thus, it's largely unavoidable. Additionally, filling of a dam typically takes around a year, maybe a few years for larger dams. Any slowing of the process would have to be of a significantly higher magnitude to make a difference. Decades, minimally.


Not to jump into fiction, but isn't this exactly what happened in World War Z at the Three Gorges Dam? After having no one left to check seismological activity, the dam cracked and burst. According to the author, the dam was built on a fault line already and was known to have caused minor earthquakes in the past.

It seems like folks already knew this, but just conveniently disregard it.

On a separate note, when I used to play Sim City 2000, hydroelectric power was my favorite energy source. Small, never broke, and clean as can be. Sure beat replacing power plants every 50 years or so.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 404 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (404)