Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Anthony Weiner not sure if that's his weiner.Follow

#77 Jun 03 2011 at 11:34 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
Nadenu wrote:
Props to lolgaxe for his continued weiner jokes.

/aprove
Don't approve him for copying me copying The Daily Show. Smiley: mad
Yeah, but it was my third one on this page, and worked into the general discussion. Don't get Weiner envy.


Smiley: glare
#78 Jun 04 2011 at 2:50 PM Rating: Good
The Weiner weiner claims its rightful place as a pronouncer of interesting political factoids.

http://weinercoverup.tumblr.com/
#79REDACTED, Posted: Jun 06 2011 at 8:32 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Looks like another women with pics of weiners weiner are set to come out. Boy the Dems just cant' catch a break.
#80 Jun 06 2011 at 8:47 AM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Looks like another women with pics of weiners weiner are set to come out. Boy the Dems just cant' catch a break.

At least Dems are getting caught in hetero sex scandals, unlike the homophobic GOP and their gay dalliances.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#81REDACTED, Posted: Jun 06 2011 at 9:05 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Debo,
#82 Jun 06 2011 at 9:09 AM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Debo,

At least? Yeah the GOP are the ones that are homophobic <rolls eyes>



Are you suggesting that Democrats are more homophobic than Republicans?
#83 Jun 06 2011 at 9:09 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
gbaji wrote:
catwho wrote:
gbaji wrote:
catwho wrote:
I think the confusion over whether it's a photo of him specifically or not also has to do with the ubiquity of that particular pair of boxer briefs. Even my husband has a pair of them.


Honestly, the question of who exactly is in the photo or whether said photo was shopped isn't that important. The question is whether or not he sent the photo.


Which he didn't. Yfrog has disabled the email-pic service that was exploited, presumably to dig through the logs and find the actual email address of the person who sent the photo for the lawyers - and the IP address.


We don't know if he did or didn't. Hence, my statement. All we know is that it's possible to exploit Yfrog to do this, not that it actually happened in this case. And while I fully admit to not having more than a cursory knowledge of the specifics, my understanding is that this didn't get sent out to "the world", but to a specific person, but done publicly so that everyone following him could see the tweet.

I'm not aware that the Yfrog exploit would result in a specific targeted tweet like that. I'm frankly not sure how it could even be possible. Automatic upload of a pic? Sure. Forwarding that to a single specific twitter account from the account it's uploaded to? I don't think so. It sounds more like wishful thinking whilst trying to come up with some rational explanation instead of the more likely obvious one that he accidentally sent a message publicly that he intended to be private.

I'm not saying it's impossible, but I think we should wait until more facts come in before leaping to the conclusion that it was all a prank played on him.
Wait for what? It's a picture of some undies. It's not my business nor the rest of free worlds if this guy sends some picture of his fruit-of-the-looms to someone else via his personal twitter account. The action is not illegal, or even really unethical.

If he was hacked, that is of interest as the specifics could be of value to other twitter users.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#84REDACTED, Posted: Jun 06 2011 at 9:10 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) eske,
#85 Jun 06 2011 at 9:11 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Does EVERYONE associated with this guy have large noses? Not to pick on stereotypes, but daaaaamn.

Also, the "new picture" is just him and his cat. Apparently the caption is the scandalous part, as it supposedly read: "me and my pussys."
#86 Jun 06 2011 at 9:16 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Breitbart is trying to claim this, that and the other to prove it had to be Weiner and Cannonfire is knocking down Breitbart's claims with the other, that and this.

I agree that Weiner should have an actual investigation opened up but I'm largely just watching stuff unfold.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#87 Jun 06 2011 at 9:19 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
varusword75 wrote:
eske,

Sure why not.


Smiley: lol

Ah, just checking.
#88 Jun 06 2011 at 9:55 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Figures varus would be salivating over Weiner.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#89REDACTED, Posted: Jun 06 2011 at 10:17 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Locked,
#90 Jun 06 2011 at 10:21 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Locked,

Better keep listening maybe there's something about blessed are the big noses.

I... honestly have no idea what this is supposed to mean. Either you're trying to say people with big noses have huge penises, or you have a dick in your ear and are all about listening to them? I dunno. It's a statement of gbaji-esque suckage.
#91 Jun 06 2011 at 10:28 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
This statement from Cannonfire wraps up the entire thing quite nicely:
Quote:
One last word about Breitbart and "new media" ethics. This entire story was based on Breitbart's willingness to accept the word of a man he had never met, a source whose voice he had never heard and whose real name remains unknown. No "lamestream" journalist would have contemplated using such a source. Breitbart cannot be absolved.

TL;DR: Breitbart fabricated a story again in an effort to ruin the public image of someone/something.
#92REDACTED, Posted: Jun 06 2011 at 11:05 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Locked,
#93REDACTED, Posted: Jun 06 2011 at 11:09 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Locked,
#94 Jun 06 2011 at 11:35 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Locked,

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1394860/Young-woman-set-reveal-exchanged-pictures-new-Weinergate-expose.html

Quote:
Mr Weiner, 46, has almost 50,000 fans on the social networking site, but he has chosen to follow just 198 in return - many of whom are attractive young females, and include a **** star, 'Miss Ginger Lee'.


Sorry little Locke but the story is real.





Flawless logic.
#95 Jun 06 2011 at 11:44 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Locked,

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1394860/Young-woman-set-reveal-exchanged-pictures-new-Weinergate-expose.html

Quote:
Mr Weiner, 46, has almost 50,000 fans on the social networking site, but he has chosen to follow just 198 in return - many of whom are attractive young females, and include a **** star, 'Miss Ginger Lee'.


Sorry little Locke but the story is real.
Sorry little Varus, I already posted on this Smiley: lol. Your "source" can't even get the facts straight:
Quote:
Denial: Gennette Cordova, who received the explicit picture from Mr Weiner's Twitter account, came out in his defence
She never received the picture Smiley: oyvey
#96 Jun 06 2011 at 12:06 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
It looks as though evidence is piling up against Weiner that, even if the original pic wasn't of/by him, he had plenty of stuff going on on the side. Which would certainly explain why he wouldn't have wanted a full on investigation into his accounts.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#97 Jun 06 2011 at 12:08 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
His lack of defense seems pretty limp.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#98 Jun 06 2011 at 12:11 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
His lack of defense seems pretty limp.
Probably has a lot of junk he doesn't want getting shown off.
#99 Jun 06 2011 at 1:26 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Debo,

At least? Yeah the GOP are the ones that are homophobic <rolls eyes>


The socially conservative, Christian right. The ones that oppose homosexuality, among other things.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#100 Jun 06 2011 at 2:06 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Weiner announced a press conference about these rumors. Should be interesting. It was set for 4PM; is it on now, anyone know?
#101 Jun 06 2011 at 2:12 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
This is supposed to be the live feed but I can't get it on my work computer (and don't have speakers anyway)

http://www.cnn.com/video/flashLive/live.html?stream=1
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 220 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (220)