Forum Settings
       
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next »
Reply To Thread

Anthony Weiner not sure if that's his weiner.Follow

#252 Jun 17 2011 at 8:58 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Back in your day, you had a kid screaming the headline on every corner.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#253 Jun 17 2011 at 9:22 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
EXTRA! EXTRA! READ ALL ABOUT IT: MAN WITH PONY PICTURE GETS RATED DOWN!! ONLY A PENNY, MISTER!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#254 Jun 17 2011 at 9:37 AM Rating: Excellent
F'ucking Karma whiner.
#255 Jun 17 2011 at 9:46 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
Score: Good

Zoinks!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#256 Jun 17 2011 at 10:14 AM Rating: Good
52,900 more, *****!
#257 Jun 17 2011 at 1:47 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
gbaji wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
The fact they were there at all like sharks is the joke.


Except that's not the story TPM wrote on this. Not shocking since they're basically a gossip/news site themselves. The story was about them cutting away when it became clear that Pelosi wasn't going to talk about the story they were there to cover
Uh, exactly. This entire topic is about how stupid the scandal is, and that video shows that instead of showing current policy speeches, the networks gossip;


And there's the point. It's not scandals that are stupid, but this scandal. Right? Else, why not make this point all the time and not just when there's a scandal that hurts the "side" they lean towards.

My point is that TPM doesn't really care about the media engaging in gossip. As I said, they are themselves gossip focused. What they care about is finding ways to make the public angry at the media for covering it rather than the politician who sent lewd photos of himself to women who weren't his wife.



Quote:
I can't help but feel if the third network were ABC instead of FOX you'd have kept quiet.


Lolirony! Nope. I'd be saying the exact thing. Ask yourself this though: If the scandal were involving a Republican, do you think TPM would have written what they did? And do you think you would be defending their attempt to distract the issue away from the politician who screwed up and on to the media covering it? Plank in your own eye first, ok?

Edited, Jun 17th 2011 12:49pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#258 Jun 17 2011 at 1:52 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
And there's the point. It's not scandals that are stupid, but this scandal. Right?

Well... uhh... yeah. Finding this dumb doesn't preclude finding a scandal about selling anthrax to Cuba stupid.

Quote:
Lolirony! Nope. I'd be saying the exact thing.

It's funny because you probably believe this is true, all evidence to the contrary.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#259 Jun 17 2011 at 2:50 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Will this story die? Not yet.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#260 Jun 17 2011 at 2:55 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
An excuse to write a show that is nothing but Weiner jokes.

Much like this thread.

Edited, Jun 17th 2011 4:56pm by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#261 Jun 17 2011 at 3:12 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
And there's the point. It's not scandals that are stupid, but this scandal. Right?

Well... uhh... yeah. Finding this dumb doesn't preclude finding a scandal about selling anthrax to Cuba stupid.


But it does apparently preclude TPM complaining about the media coverage of a scandal unless the scandal involves a Democrat, with the bizarre insistence that instead of using their live air time to ask a Democratic Party leader about a rumored resignation because of said scandal, the media should instead devote that live air time to broadcasting the agenda of his Party. Because that's how we reward married politicians who text lewd pictures of themselves to women who are not their wife. Yup. We give their party leaders more air time than normal to tell the public about their agenda. That makes so much sense! Oh wait! It doesn't. Not even a teeny tiny bit.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#262 Jun 17 2011 at 3:24 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Oh, that could be. I already said that TPM was like the liberal Drudge Report. I'm not about to argue for their bias in "reporting".
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#263 Jun 18 2011 at 12:52 AM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Belkira wrote:
It'd be difficult to stay in business if you didn't report things that people were interested in.

Well, that's kind of the point. They expanded the business past the daily paper or nightly news or hour news shows into a 24/7 cycle where they have to stretch nonsense into hysteria just to keep people watching.


Right, and it's for this reason that if there were any way to make the press a public entity without creating a massive conflict of interest, I would gladly do so. A good journalist should be a professional, like a doctor, a lawyer, a teacher... tell you what you NEED to hear, not merely what you want to hear. The societal value of the job has always been intended to create an informed public, not to be entertaining. Besides which, they do a ****** job of being entertaining.
#264 Jun 18 2011 at 8:20 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Kachi wrote:
A good journalist should be a professional, like a doctor, a lawyer, a teacher...


It'd probably need a more robust professional regulation system for that to be the case though, wouldn't it? Registration boards, continuing education, signed & accepted ethics standards? I see that they have a couple of professional societies, but it doesn't appear that they have any sway to me.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next »
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 927 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (927)