Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Germany pledges nuclear shutdown by 2022 Follow

#1 May 30 2011 at 5:24 AM Rating: Default
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/europe/2011/05/201153034439477635.html

Japan uses antiquated reactors flawed in design and they **** up after the country is hit by a tidal wave. Germany decides to abandon nuclear power, which accounts for nearly a quarter of their energy and uses different types of reactors, in favor of some undeclared alternative energy sources in response to some minor incident in Asia with negligible effects. You can trace very many wars, acts of terrorism etc to the use of oil. There are an average of 4 civilian nuclear accidents a decade, of which very few (2-3?) are at all notable.

Very democratically styled logic indeed.
#2 May 30 2011 at 5:35 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Yay?
#3 May 30 2011 at 5:41 AM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
nonwto wrote:
notable.




Noteable on an epic scale tho'.
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#4 May 30 2011 at 5:49 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
paulsol wrote:
nonwto wrote:
notable.




Noteable on an epic scale tho'.
There's been 3 epic accidents in nuclear facilities over the last 10 years?
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#5 May 30 2011 at 7:20 AM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Godzilla was a pretty epic accident.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#6 May 30 2011 at 7:31 AM Rating: Good
German engineering has always been a leader in many technologies. If any country can make green energy profitable, they can.
#7 May 30 2011 at 7:48 AM Rating: Decent
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
This policy is dumb, in my opinion. Nuclear energy is going to be required if we're going to wean ourselves off of fossil fuels.

Edited, May 30th 2011 9:49am by Nilatai
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#8 May 30 2011 at 8:17 AM Rating: Good
Nilatai wrote:
This policy is dumb, in my opinion. Nuclear energy is going to be required if we're going to wean ourselves off of fossil fuels.

Edited, May 30th 2011 9:49am by Nilatai


That doesn't necessarily mean it has to be nuclear fission, which is is what is causing all the problems. The US has been investigating fusion technologies, which are much cleaner. It's still nuclear energy, but a much better kind. No nuclear waste, no CO2 emissions, and a much better ROI over time (at least in theory... the NIF is just a proof-of-concept system that the US plans to license out.)
#9 May 30 2011 at 8:30 AM Rating: Decent
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
catwho wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
This policy is dumb, in my opinion. Nuclear energy is going to be required if we're going to wean ourselves off of fossil fuels.

Edited, May 30th 2011 9:49am by Nilatai


That doesn't necessarily mean it has to be nuclear fission, which is is what is causing all the problems. The US has been investigating fusion technologies, which are much cleaner. It's still nuclear energy, but a much better kind. No nuclear waste, no CO2 emissions, and a much better ROI over time (at least in theory... the NIF is just a proof-of-concept system that the US plans to license out.)
Seriously? Fusion has been 10 years away for the past 40 years. When we have a working fusion reactor, then we can decommission fission facilities. Until then it's silly.

The fact remains that fission when done properly is much better for the environment than fossil fuels are, and it produces more energy than full solar, wind, tidal and others. Rather than holding out for fusion, we should be working on making solar energy more viable.

Nuclear fission is a stop gap measure as far as I'm concerned, but getting rid of it when the west is still mostly dependant on fossil fuels is short sighted, in my opinion.

Edited, May 30th 2011 10:30am by Nilatai
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#10 May 30 2011 at 9:19 AM Rating: Decent
****
7,861 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
paulsol wrote:
nonwto wrote:
notable.




Noteable on an epic scale tho'.
There's been 3 epic accidents in nuclear facilities over the last 10 years?

I believe there have been 3 level 5 or higher events in the last 40 years or so.
____________________________
People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome. ~River Tam

Sedao
#11 May 30 2011 at 9:27 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Nilatai wrote:
catwho wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
This policy is dumb, in my opinion. Nuclear energy is going to be required if we're going to wean ourselves off of fossil fuels.

Edited, May 30th 2011 9:49am by Nilatai


That doesn't necessarily mean it has to be nuclear fission, which is is what is causing all the problems. The US has been investigating fusion technologies, which are much cleaner. It's still nuclear energy, but a much better kind. No nuclear waste, no CO2 emissions, and a much better ROI over time (at least in theory... the NIF is just a proof-of-concept system that the US plans to license out.)
Seriously? Fusion has been 10 years away for the past 40 years. When we have a working fusion reactor, then we can decommission fission facilities. Until then it's silly.

The fact remains that fission when done properly is much better for the environment than fossil fuels are, and it produces more energy than full solar, wind, tidal and others. Rather than holding out for fusion, we should be working on making solar energy more viable.

Nuclear fission is a stop gap measure as far as I'm concerned, but getting rid of it when the west is still mostly dependant on fossil fuels is short sighted, in my opinion.

Edited, May 30th 2011 10:30am by Nilatai


I think fission should be part of our energy mix, if just to keep the door open on fusion. But fusion will be a 80 year project, barring breakthroughs, so algal biofuel development should be rushed, as it is used like fossil fuel but has the footprint of wind.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#12 May 30 2011 at 10:07 AM Rating: Excellent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
This sounds like a very short-sighted, knee-jerk reaction from the Germans to me. What happened in Japan is highly unlikely to happen in Germany - northern Europe is not a hotbed of earthquakes and tsunamis like Japan is. In short, they're going to cripple themselves - and as one of the strongest economies in a stricken EU, this does not bode well for the region. What I heard is that they're planning on some mass windfarms in the North Sea, but they don't have (nor will they any time soon) the infrastructure needed to take that power from the north coast to anywhere deeper inland. That, and buying power off of France's nuclear grid, which seems somewhat...hypocritical?
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#13 May 30 2011 at 10:49 AM Rating: Decent
Scholar
****
4,593 posts
One problem with nuclear power is disposal of the waste. Mainly the fact that...well...you can't. You have to keep it. Effectively forever. You have to maintain forever increasing secure shielded storage space, like forever.

That's going to be a big bill in a couple hundred years, one that never goes away.

I'm not a fan of fossil fuels, but Nuclear Fission should not be seen as anything but a temporary measure until we come up with cleaner ways of doing it.

Fusion is still a pipe dream at this point. Until we develop some superawesomeheatresistantmaterialofdoom it's going nowhere and frankly if we had said material there are much easier ways of generating energy with it.

In the end, barring a breakthrough, I think we'll all end up using mostly solar/tidal/hydro. I don't think wind will make it.
#14 May 30 2011 at 11:20 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
Nilatai wrote:
When we have a working fusion reactor


2050, if Sim City is to be believed.
#15 May 30 2011 at 12:18 PM Rating: Decent
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
Eske Esquire wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
When we have a working fusion reactor


2050, if Sim City is to be believed.
I trust the good people at EA know their shit.
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#16 May 30 2011 at 1:05 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
******
29,919 posts
Nilatai wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
When we have a working fusion reactor


2050, if Sim City is to be believed.
I trust the good people at EA know their shit.


Never, ever, ever say "good people" and "EA" in the same sentance. These are the same ******* that killed Westwood and Origin.

Once we have a working Fusion reactor, we just shove all the nuclear waste into it and make stuff we can fission. then we shove that back in the fission reactor and make stuff we can fusion.

Seriously though, the main issue with nuclear waste is that we don't recycle or reprocess any of it. Because that process results in weapons grade materials. If we did reprocess all our nuclear waste, for one thing, the volume would be much, much smaller Right now anythign that might have possibly been in contact with a particle of radioactive material is classified as nuclear waste. Huge amounts of steel, insulation, lead, etc that aren't in their own right radioactive are put into nuclear storage because no one wants to take the time or effort to just isolate the actually radioactive parts. Other spent fuel rods that could be reprocessed into new fuel rods with only a 20%ish reduction in volume aren't.

Between that, and our outdated reactor designs in service, and we have issues. We already have working, proven designs for encapsulated pebble bed reactors that work just as well as the rod type reactors but also are impossible to melt down even without any functional coolant. Each of the pebbles is coated in a reaction limiting compound. You would literally have to break into the containment vessel, chip all the coating away from all the pebbles. stick them all back in a pile, then shut off the coolant to cause a melt down. They require less parts to operate, and when coupled with the same sort of cooling system we have on most of our reactors here (which is incidentally at least significantly more robust than the ones in japan were) the resulting reactor is literally orders of magnitude safer. And other than the U.S. navy, we haven't built any of them on a commercial scale.

nuclear energy and nuclear waste isn't the problem. it's our policies on how we play with them that are to blame.
____________________________
Arch Duke Kaolian Drachensborn, lvl 95 Ranger, Unrest Server
Tech support forum | FAQ (Support) | Mobile Zam: http://m.zam.com (Premium only)
Forum Rules
#17 May 30 2011 at 1:45 PM Rating: Decent
nonwto wrote:
in favor of some undeclared alternative energy sources in response to some minor incident in Asia with negligible effects.


Somehow the people that will have to deal with the negligible effects for the next several thousand years will love you. Better yet you can live right next to the reactor in Japan and prove us wrong!
#18 May 30 2011 at 1:57 PM Rating: Decent
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
Tailmon wrote:
nonwto wrote:
in favor of some undeclared alternative energy sources in response to some minor incident in Asia with negligible effects.


Somehow the people that will have to deal with the negligible effects for the next several thousand years will love you. Better yet you can live right next to the reactor in Japan and prove us wrong!
Um, "several thousand years"?

Clean up will take around a decade max, and there will be an exclusion zone around the facility. Like in Chernobyl. It won't be any where near several thousand years of people living on top of radioactive material, though.
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#19 May 30 2011 at 3:54 PM Rating: Good
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
I've got an easy solution for all the radioactive nuclear waste. Load it up into a cheap rocket and fire it into the Sun. Hell, we should do that with *all* of our waste! Imagine it, seas of landfill scooped up and sent into the biggest incinerator imaginable.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#20 May 30 2011 at 5:15 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Old lady Merkel did this?

Conservatives hate nuclear power!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#21REDACTED, Posted: May 30 2011 at 5:34 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) http://www.hwdyk.com/q/images/futurama_1_8_09.jpg
#22 May 30 2011 at 5:36 PM Rating: Default
****
9,395 posts
I knew this would happen. Nuclear power is very safe, but something happens that was caused by something completely unrelated to the inner workings of he power plant(earthquake), and suddenly everyone thinks it's going to kill us all.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#23 May 30 2011 at 5:52 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Driftwood wrote:
I knew this would happen. Nuclear power is very safe, but something happens that was caused by something completely unrelated to the inner workings of he power plant(earthquake), and suddenly everyone thinks it's going to kill us all.
I'm all for nuclear power, but to act like natural disasters aren't an issue when a nuclear power plant is built in an area commonly hit by natural disasters is asinine.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#24 May 30 2011 at 6:00 PM Rating: Default
****
9,395 posts
Quote:
I'm all for nuclear power, but to act like natural disasters aren't an issue when a nuclear power plant is built in an area commonly hit by natural disasters is asinine.


I'm not saying they're not an issue, but the fact that there was a natural disaster involved will likely be ignored by the majority as they sit there and say that nuclear power is dangerous and should be stopped.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#25 May 30 2011 at 6:16 PM Rating: Decent
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
Driftwood wrote:
I knew this would happen. Nuclear power is very safe, but something happens that was caused by something completely unrelated to the inner workings of he power plant(earthquake), and suddenly everyone thinks it's going to kill us all.
I'm all for nuclear power, but to act like natural disasters aren't an issue when a nuclear power plant is built in an area commonly hit by natural disasters is asinine.
Natural disasters aren't an issue in northern Europe, though.


The real problem is people like this. Appealing to fear and focusing expressly on the negatives. It's all the anti-nuclear lobby has. Well, that and funding from oil companies.

Edited, May 30th 2011 8:23pm by Nilatai
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#26 May 31 2011 at 8:43 AM Rating: Good
Official Shrubbery Waterer
*****
14,659 posts
Having just returned from the German countryside, I can report that the amount of windmills and solar panels in the country make me feel slightly ashamed for us 'Mericans.

They also have way better beer. Srsly, we need to get on that.
____________________________
Jophiel wrote:
I managed to be both retarded and entertaining.

« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 176 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (176)