Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Afraid of the Dark?Follow

#202 May 24 2011 at 10:29 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
Moebiuslord wrote:
Because, let's be honest, there aren't a whole lot of loonies out there saying they are fundamentalist pre-Christian gentile believers.
Nor quoting Leviticus to base their argument, amirite? Smiley: rolleyes

There are plenty of those. I would never suggest otherwise. But they're doin it wrong. I am just as opposed to misguided Christian fundamentalism as I am to misguided Islamic fundamentalism. All things in moderation, including moderation.
Amen to that.
#203 May 24 2011 at 10:29 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
LeWoVoc wrote:
Quote:
In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;

Is there a reason you cut out the words prior to this quote? You know, the ones where it's clear that he's saying the angels, at the time of judgment, will punish those who didn't obey God? Not that we should take it upon ourselves to do so?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#204 May 24 2011 at 10:30 AM Rating: Decent
-REDACTED-
Scholar
***
1,150 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
You have stuff like this, though.... which is basically "follow Christ or be killed." So you're not completely off the hook there, either.

So, you found the consequence for failing to heed the Christian message? Awesome.

Were you meaning that to be justification of violence by people in the name of Christ? Sh:t, sorry. See above.


So, Yahweh is *still* a murdering psychopath. Only instead of having others do it for him right now, he'll do it himself, later. Amirite?

Answer me this, Moe. No dodging, no hemhawing, just a yes or no answer:

Do you, personally, believe that everyone who does not accept Christ deserves to be killed?
#205 May 24 2011 at 10:31 AM Rating: Good
Belkira wrote:
Kalivha wrote:
The "And the Lord said..." bits are actually the parts I am referring to that are unquestionably meant as God's word. The rest is too, I guess, just in a lesser degree. The difference I have meant to point out is exactly that; literal quote versus paraphrasing of what God wants his people to know.

I think you can agree that there's a lot more room for interpretation when someone isn't literally quoted.


I suppose it's just a difference of writting style. I mean, it would get pretty repetative to have "and the lord said" before every single sentence.

I don't believe that the koran is the literal quotes from Allah either, though. It's the exact same thing as the authors of the bible. I just don't understand why you lend more credence to one group saying "we have the word of god" than another group.


Because there is no account of all the people who have written the Bible having talked to God and received direct instructions on what exactly to put in it. Not consistently, anyway. There definitely is the legend of Mohammed in the cave receiving the word of God and writing it down like he was told. I don't believe that actually happened, but that's the premise under which the Quran is supposed to be understood by believers.

And if you actually read through the Bible, it gets pretty repetitive, anyway. Biblical Hebrew is a fairly limited language in some ways (like how every other sentence actually starts with and/וְ), and good parts of the New Testament haven't even been written by native speakers, so it's not like the whole book is stylistically flawless.

I think there are multiple factors that make me see it that way. Another one is the whole translation issue - it makes being Christian a whole lot easier and I don't see anything wrong with it personally (having to learn a new language just to be able to be religious is a bit over the top), but I've seen how much of the meaning gets lost and shifted and even if it is the word of God, it's really distorted in translation and a lot of the meaning simply can't be transferred, so the whole thing gets a whole lot murkier again.
#206 May 24 2011 at 10:33 AM Rating: Good
***
3,362 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
You have stuff like this, though.... which is basically "follow Christ or be killed." So you're not completely off the hook there, either.

So, you found the consequence for failing to heed the Christian message? Awesome.

Were you meaning that to be justification of violence by people in the name of Christ? Sh:t, sorry. See above.
"Believe what I believe to be true or you get to be punished forever and ever and burn and die."

Yep. That's morality for you. This is the point where someone steps in and tells me I'm being closed-minded again. You do realize that, using this logic, you can justify the calls to violence in the Koran, right?
#207 May 24 2011 at 10:34 AM Rating: Excellent
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
So, Yahweh is *still* a murdering psychopath. Only instead of having others do it for him right now, he'll do it himself, later. Amirite?

Your characterization, not mine, but basically, yeah.
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
Answer me this, Moe. No dodging, no hemhawing, just a yes or no answer:

Do you, personally, believe that everyone who does not accept Christ deserves to be killed?

Bob, I hope not. I'd be a smoldering pile of ash at the moment.
#208 May 24 2011 at 10:35 AM Rating: Decent
LeWoVoc wrote:
You do realize that, using this logic, you can justify the calls to violence in the Koran, right?

Using logic you can justify most things. I fail to see the point.
#209 May 24 2011 at 10:35 AM Rating: Good
***
3,362 posts
Jophiel wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
Quote:
In flaming fire taking vengeance on them that know not God, and that obey not the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ: Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord, and from the glory of his power;

Is there a reason you cut out the words prior to this quote? You know, the ones where it's clear that he's saying the angels, at the time of judgment, will punish those who didn't obey God? Not that we should take it upon ourselves to do so?
No intellectual dishonesty here. Simply taken out of context. Sorry about that.

It still doesn't change the fact that it's "follow this worldview or you're going to die and suffer," though. That's not moral.

Edited, May 24th 2011 10:36am by LeWoVoc
#210 May 24 2011 at 10:35 AM Rating: Good
***
3,362 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
You do realize that, using this logic, you can justify the calls to violence in the Koran, right?

Using logic you can justify most things. I fail to see the point.
Why is the Bible true and the Koran untrue then? Why is the Bible the source of morality rather than the Koran?
#211 May 24 2011 at 10:37 AM Rating: Decent
LeWoVoc wrote:
No intellectual dishonesty here. Simply taken out of context. Sorry about that.

Read: "It was a conveniently worded verse that I had no reason to explore further. I'm trying to win an argument here!"

I'm just yankin' yer d:ck.
#212 May 24 2011 at 10:37 AM Rating: Decent
-REDACTED-
Scholar
***
1,150 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
So, Yahweh is *still* a murdering psychopath. Only instead of having others do it for him right now, he'll do it himself, later. Amirite?

Your characterization, not mine, but basically, yeah.
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
Answer me this, Moe. No dodging, no hemhawing, just a yes or no answer:

Do you, personally, believe that everyone who does not accept Christ deserves to be killed?

Bob, I hope not. I'd be a smoldering pile of ash at the moment.


Ok, well that's good at least. Though, now I'm confused. Why have you been expending all this effort defending something you don't believe in?
#213 May 24 2011 at 10:37 AM Rating: Good
LeWoVoc wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
You do realize that, using this logic, you can justify the calls to violence in the Koran, right?

Using logic you can justify most things. I fail to see the point.
Why is the Bible true and the Koran untrue then? Why is the Bible the source of morality rather than the Koran?

Is it? I'm not being obtuse, I'm just not sure I've said that.
#214 May 24 2011 at 10:38 AM Rating: Good
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
Why have you been expending all this effort defending something you don't believe in?

Don't assume I don't believe it and you will be less confused.

Or more confused.

It's complicated.
#215 May 24 2011 at 10:42 AM Rating: Good
Kalivha wrote:
Because there is no account of all the people who have written the Bible having talked to God and received direct instructions on what exactly to put in it. Not consistently, anyway. There definitely is the legend of Mohammed in the cave receiving the word of God and writing it down like he was told. I don't believe that actually happened, but that's the premise under which the Quran is supposed to be understood by believers.


In one section, sure. But he supposedly wrote on other revelations. The whole book isn't from that one meeting in that one cave, from what I understand.

Again, this is no different from the bible.
#216 May 24 2011 at 10:46 AM Rating: Decent
-REDACTED-
Scholar
***
1,150 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
So, Yahweh is *still* a murdering psychopath. Only instead of having others do it for him right now, he'll do it himself, later. Amirite?

Your characterization, not mine, but basically, yeah.
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
Answer me this, Moe. No dodging, no hemhawing, just a yes or no answer:

Do you, personally, believe that everyone who does not accept Christ deserves to be killed?

Bob, I hope not. I'd be a smoldering pile of ash at the moment.


MoebiusLord wrote:
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
Why have you been expending all this effort defending something you don't believe in?

Don't assume I don't believe it and you will be less confused.

Or more confused.

It's complicated.


It certainly is. As I understand it you've basically said above that God will kill (and/or torture) those who do not accept Christ/the Christian message. Then you answered my question "do they deserve that?" with a no. So, you believe that God is going to kill/torture people who do not deserve to be killed/tortured? And you're okay with that?
#217 May 24 2011 at 11:07 AM Rating: Good
***
3,362 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
You do realize that, using this logic, you can justify the calls to violence in the Koran, right?

Using logic you can justify most things. I fail to see the point.
Why is the Bible true and the Koran untrue then? Why is the Bible the source of morality rather than the Koran?

Is it? I'm not being obtuse, I'm just not sure I've said that.
Fair enough. Again, though, it's kind of something important to know.
#218 May 24 2011 at 11:12 AM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Oh, you wacky kids and your freaky religion...

Scary, bad stuff.
#219 May 24 2011 at 11:13 AM Rating: Good
LeWoVoc wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
You do realize that, using this logic, you can justify the calls to violence in the Koran, right?

Using logic you can justify most things. I fail to see the point.
Why is the Bible true and the Koran untrue then? Why is the Bible the source of morality rather than the Koran?

Is it? I'm not being obtuse, I'm just not sure I've said that.
Fair enough. Again, though, it's kind of something important to know.

It'd sure be nice to have a little guidance. Then again, I've heard it's about faith.
#220 May 24 2011 at 11:14 AM Rating: Good
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
As I understand it you've basically said above that God will kill (and/or torture) those who do not accept Christ/the Christian message. Then you answered my question "do they deserve that?" with a no. So, you believe that God is going to kill/torture people who do not deserve to be killed/tortured? And you're okay with that?

No metaphor is perfect.
#221 May 24 2011 at 11:16 AM Rating: Good
***
3,362 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
You do realize that, using this logic, you can justify the calls to violence in the Koran, right?

Using logic you can justify most things. I fail to see the point.
Why is the Bible true and the Koran untrue then? Why is the Bible the source of morality rather than the Koran?

Is it? I'm not being obtuse, I'm just not sure I've said that.
Fair enough. Again, though, it's kind of something important to know.

It'd sure be nice to have a little guidance. Then again, I've heard it's about faith.
And we've reached the point of "Agree to disagree."
#222 May 24 2011 at 11:21 AM Rating: Decent
-REDACTED-
Scholar
***
1,150 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
As I understand it you've basically said above that God will kill (and/or torture) those who do not accept Christ/the Christian message. Then you answered my question "do they deserve that?" with a no. So, you believe that God is going to kill/torture people who do not deserve to be killed/tortured? And you're okay with that?

No metaphor is perfect.


LeWoVoc wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
LeWoVoc wrote:
You do realize that, using this logic, you can justify the calls to violence in the Koran, right?

Using logic you can justify most things. I fail to see the point.
Why is the Bible true and the Koran untrue then? Why is the Bible the source of morality rather than the Koran?

Is it? I'm not being obtuse, I'm just not sure I've said that.
Fair enough. Again, though, it's kind of something important to know.

It'd sure be nice to have a little guidance. Then again, I've heard it's about faith.
And we've reached the point of "Agree to disagree."


Yep. Agree to disagree, and (at least with what I was asking about) to be confused as all hell.

Edited, May 24th 2011 1:21pm by ShadorVIII
#223 May 24 2011 at 11:48 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
So, Yahweh is *still* a murdering psychopath. Only instead of having others do it for him right now, he'll do it himself, later. Amirite?

Your characterization, not mine, but basically, yeah.
Princess ShadorVIII wrote:
Answer me this, Moe. No dodging, no hemhawing, just a yes or no answer:

Do you, personally, believe that everyone who does not accept Christ deserves to be killed?

Bob, I hope not.
Bob is my husband. Yeah, he's that good.

So the other day I'm rummaging around in the basement for something and I find my little plaque with all the verses we were to memorize one year in Sunday School. Each verse on my little plaque has a shiny star stuck next to it, denoting my rote success.

I remembered the day I completed that series of verses. I was in the first year k-1 sunday school class. That Sunday I was the first to get all my stars when I recited psalm 23. As soon as I finished, though, I sat down and I wet my pants. This was a big ol' scary church and no one had ever bothered showing me where the bathrooms were and I was small and didn't yet have great control over my bladder. So anyways, ok, I pee in my chair. I'm thinking this isn't a big deal. I've wet my pants before and it was of little consequence. Sunday school is nearly over. I can ignore it til I get home. But noooooo, some missy tattle-tale shouts out to the sunday school teacher that I've wet my pants. The kids all tease me, the teacher scolds me - SCOLDS ME!!, I cry, get teased some more. From then on, come Sunday mornings you'd find me hiding in the garage with my Dad, my god-fearing days over.

____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#224 May 24 2011 at 10:37 PM Rating: Excellent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
Allegory wrote:
Though I'd still disagree, I hope at the very least those that would argue religion is not responsible for any malevolence would apply their belief consistency. That is, religion is no more responsible for any tragedy than it is for any charity. That is, those who have use religion as a tool to convince others to donate have as equally twisted it to their own ends as those who has used it as a tool to rally troops

More appropriately that it should be applied consistently in toto to both concepts. It can clearly be demonstrated that violence and bloodshed in the name of Christ is not called for, so as a justification for same the Bible is lacking. It cannot, however, be demonstrated that charity in the name of Christ is not called for, as there are volumes of exhortations to charity within the Old & New Testaments.

There are more religions than just Christianity, quite a few I hear. But even within Christianity there are quite a few mixed messages, especially when you begin to argue over what to take literally and what to take as a metaphor. The idea of god as being a primarily a benevolent entity is largely a new idea within Christianity, and a product of the Enlightenment and people like Martin Luther. Before that God was mostly a judgmental entity, bringing grace to those who pleased him and just punishment to those who displeased him.

Ultimately I think this comes back to where we differ. I think the message of any philosophy is largely irrelevant, rather it is the effects that matter. Even if we agree Christianity promotes a message of only beneficial/loving ideas, if it actually creates a net increase in animosity and violence among people, then it is a force of violence. I could promote a philosophy of absolute peace that advocates dealing with your animosity by punching inanimate objects instead of people, but even though I state a nonviolent message my advocated practices actually increase people's violent feelings. Even though I clearly state for participants to not be violent, the result is that they feel more rage and are more likely to be violent.

Edited, May 24th 2011 11:38pm by Allegory
#225 May 24 2011 at 10:46 PM Rating: Good
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Allegory wrote:
There are more religions than just Christianity, quite a few I hear.
Well yeah, but only one is right, duh. After all, what language is the bible written in? American.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#226 May 25 2011 at 6:46 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
bsphil wrote:
Allegory wrote:
There are more religions than just Christianity, quite a few I hear.
Well yeah, but only one is right, duh. After all, what language is the bible written in? American.
Ye olde American, actually. "Judge not lest ye be judged"? Who says "lest" or "ye" any more?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 900 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (900)