Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Liberal media bias? The hell you say.Follow

#27 May 13 2011 at 3:57 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Six of one, half a dozen of the other.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#28ThiefX, Posted: May 13 2011 at 7:15 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Are you so incapable of just admitting you're wrong that you are honestly gonna claim a poll conducted of a very small amount of people is accurate? That there is absolutely nothing wrong with major news organizations running this poll of a very small amount of Americans and claiming that Obama has a 60% approval rating as fact?
#29 May 13 2011 at 7:30 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
ThiefX wrote:
Actually it's because I have a job and a life
Your job must suck. I'm not entirely sure what the best part of my job is. The ability to literally command people to do whatever I want, the pure security in knowing I can't possibly be fired, all the movies and video games I play while getting paid, the fact you pay my paycheck and can't do anything about it, or the fact that you'd suck my **** with a bunch of false patriotism.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#30ThiefX, Posted: May 13 2011 at 8:24 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) You live in your mom's basement don't you? You're that creepy guy that every town has. You know the guy in his 40's who still lives at home. The guy who wears cargo shorts, T-shirts with curse words on it and baseball hats, the guy who doesn't really have any real friends spends a lot of time alone watching movies and jerking off to internet **** 3 times a day. The guy who stares just a little hard at pre-teen girls as they walk by in the mall.
#31 May 13 2011 at 8:27 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
Sorry, I can't hear your generic internet cliches over my awesomeness. You should go watch Fox News and come back when you've got something you think is worth my time to directly respond to.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#32 May 13 2011 at 9:55 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
ThiefX wrote:

You live in your mom's basement don't you? You're that creepy guy that every town has. You know the guy in his 40's who still lives at home. The guy who wears cargo shorts, T-shirts with curse words on it and baseball hats, the guy who doesn't really have any real friends spends a lot of time alone watching movies and jerking off to internet **** 3 times a day. The guy who stares just a little hard at pre-teen girls as they walk by in the mall.


These types of answers usually come from someone very young. Say... 17?

Also, poking at Joph saying his post count doesn't make him "look cool", also screams 17. I mean really, who the hell worries about looking cool except for people in high school?
#33 May 13 2011 at 10:19 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
ThiefX wrote:
(Hey Joph this may come as a shock to you but a high post count in here ain't really cool.... it's sad and pathetic and a border line cry for help but not cool.)

Joph's Law, represent! Thanks!

Quote:
Are you so incapable of just admitting you're wrong that you are honestly gonna claim a poll conducted of a very small amount of people is accurate?

So you don't understand the numbers. That's fine. It's pretty obvious that you need this.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#34gbaji, Posted: May 16 2011 at 3:00 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Equally interesting, and perhaps more relevant to this thread, is that more people identify as Democrats than identify themselves as Liberal (twice as many in fact). Which still leaves us with a skewed sample since it means that most of those identifying as Moderate are Democrats (23% out of 36%), and presumably there are some who lean or vote Democratic, but don't self identify as Democrats. Whether we assume that some moderates are in the category or some liberals, we're still left with a pretty significant skew towards the left.
#35 May 16 2011 at 3:01 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
bsphil wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Is anyone surprised?
That there is fabricated outrage in a conservative opinion article? Of course not.


If it were fabricated outrage in a liberal opinion article you'd be outraged about it though, wouldn't you?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#36 May 16 2011 at 3:35 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Equally interesting, and perhaps more relevant to this thread, is that more people identify as Democrats than identify themselves as Liberal (twice as many in fact). Which still leaves us with a skewed sample since it means that most of those identifying as Moderate are Democrats (23% out of 36%), and presumably there are some who lean or vote Democratic, but don't self identify as Democrats. Whether we assume that some moderates are in the category or some liberals, we're still left with a pretty significant skew towards the left.

It's interesting but not really evidence of any skew. It mainly shows that Democrats don't like to call themselves liberal and conservatives don't like to call themselves Republicans. And that there's greater party affiliation towards Democrats than towards Republicans which has historically been the case (aside from a few bumps).

Quote:
I think I speak for all conservatives when I say that I'm not surprised in the least by this.

I think I can speak for everyone else when I say that no one is surprised by your misunderstanding when it means you have a new cross to hang from.

Edited, May 16th 2011 4:35pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#37 May 16 2011 at 4:54 PM Rating: Good
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
gbaji wrote:
bsphil wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Is anyone surprised?
That there is fabricated outrage in a conservative opinion article? Of course not.
If it were fabricated outrage in a liberal opinion article you'd be outraged about it though, wouldn't you?
No. I generally don't read opinion columns, I stick just to news.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#38 May 16 2011 at 5:37 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Equally interesting, and perhaps more relevant to this thread, is that more people identify as Democrats than identify themselves as Liberal (twice as many in fact). Which still leaves us with a skewed sample since it means that most of those identifying as Moderate are Democrats (23% out of 36%), and presumably there are some who lean or vote Democratic, but don't self identify as Democrats. Whether we assume that some moderates are in the category or some liberals, we're still left with a pretty significant skew towards the left.

It's interesting but not really evidence of any skew.


Of course it's evidence of skew. The total number of those who identify as "Conservatives" is less than those who identify as "Democrats". Even if we assume an even split between people who are ideologically predisposed to support Obama versus those who are not out of the remainder, we're left with a pool of respondents which is significantly skewed in favor of the president.

Quote:
It mainly shows that Democrats don't like to call themselves liberal and conservatives don't like to call themselves Republicans. And that there's greater party affiliation towards Democrats than towards Republicans which has historically been the case (aside from a few bumps).


Sure. By party affiliation, but as you say, that reflects just the labeling trend. But clearly the number of people who "lean right" versus who "lean left", is more balanced than that. But that's not represented in the pool used by AP. The question is whether their sample is representative of the population as a whole (or the voting population as a whole alternatively). That is clearly not the case, right?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#39 May 16 2011 at 5:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Of course it's evidence of skew.

Heh.

Quote:
Even if we assume an even split between people who are ideologically predisposed to support Obama versus those who are not out of the remainder

Why would we?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#40 May 16 2011 at 6:13 PM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
bsphil wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Is anyone surprised?
That there is fabricated outrage in a conservative opinion article? Of course not.


If it were fabricated outrage in a liberal opinion article you'd be outraged about it though, wouldn't you?


The Gbaji version of "neener neener"...
#41 May 16 2011 at 6:13 PM Rating: Excellent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
gbaji wrote:
Of course it's evidence of skew.
Yes, years worth of very consistent skew, lol.

Do you ever listen to yourself sometimes? It's pathetic.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#42 May 16 2011 at 6:28 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Jophiel wrote:
It mainly shows that Democrats don't like to call themselves liberal


I think its funny how both sides think Obama is actually a liberal.

Edited, May 17th 2011 12:29am by paulsol
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#43 May 16 2011 at 8:36 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Quote:
Even if we assume an even split between people who are ideologically predisposed to support Obama versus those who are not out of the remainder

Why would we?


Er? We don't have to. The more likely assumption would be that a majority of those in the middle group are going to lean in favor of Obama. You do get that the "even if we assume an even split" is me giving your position the greatest benefit of the doubt possible, right?


Start with the facts:

23% Liberal
36% Moderate
38% Conservative

46% Democrat
24% dont know/don't lean
29% Republican

Now let's apply a bit of logic:

Everyone who identifies as a Republican is going to also identify as a Conservative (because that label isn't a negative to Republicans). So Republican is a subset of Conservative. On the other side, that's not true though. Not all Democrats identify as Liberal. If we take the absolute best case possible and assume that all 23% who make up Liberals are Democrats, and then the first 23% of Moderates round out the whole Democrat portion of the poll, that still leaves us with 46% Democrat and 38% Conservative, with about another 16% of Moderates (plus folks who didn't say) in the middle. Even if every single one of those people leaned against Obama (extremely unlikely), you'd still end out with a 46/54 split (about even).

Here's the problem though. That's a "best case". We can reasonably assume that not all those who identify themselves as Liberal also identify themselves as Democrats, right? Thus, every percentage point of people in that group pushes the "Democrat" portion of the polling group farther into the Moderates (since that block still takes up 46% of the whole group and has to come from somewhere). Meaning that even more of that group is going to lean towards Obama. And that further assumes that no one inside the Moderate group *also* tends to lean in favor of Obama but doesn't identify as Democrats either.

It's just that you have to have only 4% of the total respondents being non-Democrats who favor Obama for the poll to come out "even". That seems incredibly unlikely. And I'm not even addressing the issue of people who identify themselves as Democrats *and* also as Conservatives. Obviously, we can't nail down the degree of skew here, but you kinda have to be engaging in massive wishful thinking (or willful ignorance) to think that it's not there and its not significant.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#44 May 16 2011 at 8:49 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Er? We don't have to. The more likely assumption...

So you're going to use your assumptions to try and prove a poll wrong. Well, I can't think of any problems there :D

You're mixing up the approvals versus the partisan/ideological splits. I'm not going to waste more time on it since you're never going to agree that it wasn't some scary liberal attack but the simple answer is that you're confused. Or willfully ignoring it.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#45 May 17 2011 at 7:30 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
paulsol wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
It mainly shows that Democrats don't like to call themselves liberal


I think its funny how both sides think Obama is actually a liberal.


Aren't you needed on set for The Hobbit?
#46 May 17 2011 at 1:15 PM Rating: Good
****
4,158 posts
Eske Esquire wrote:
paulsol wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
It mainly shows that Democrats don't like to call themselves liberal


I think its funny how both sides think Obama is actually a liberal.


Aren't you needed on set for The Hobbit?



Hey Joph, this cnut is using your joke....
____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#47 May 17 2011 at 1:59 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
10,601 posts
It's not really worth coming up with a new one, plus classics are always good. Smiley: thumbsup

Edited, May 17th 2011 3:00pm by Xsarus
____________________________
01001001 00100000 01001100 01001001 01001011 01000101 00100000 01000011 01000001 01001011 01000101
You'll always be stupid, you'll just be stupid with more information in your brain
Forum FAQ
#48 May 17 2011 at 3:04 PM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
paulsol wrote:
Eske Esquire wrote:
paulsol wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
It mainly shows that Democrats don't like to call themselves liberal


I think its funny how both sides think Obama is actually a liberal.


Aren't you needed on set for The Hobbit?



Hey Joph, this cnut is using your joke....


Hey Nobby, Bilbo is using your insult...


Smiley: grin
#49 May 18 2011 at 5:15 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Er? We don't have to. The more likely assumption...

So you're going to use your assumptions to try and prove a poll wrong.


No. The poll isn't wrong. Your interpretation of the poll is wrong. You don't actually think that polls tell us things like whether or not the media is biased do you? Because that's a bit strange even for you.

Quote:
You're mixing up the approvals versus the partisan/ideological splits.


I'm not looking at the other responses at all. The only question I'm interested in is whether the sample used in the poll might be skewed in favor of Obama. And based on the makeup, the odds are very very high that they are. The only way they come out even is if we assume that nearly every single person in the sample who might favor Obama also identified themselves as a Democrat. Put another way, it assumes that not a single person who identifies as a Republican, or a Conservative, or a Moderate or "don't know" leans in favor of Obama. Again, that's incredibly unlikely.

Quote:
I'm not going to waste more time on it since you're never going to agree that it wasn't some scary liberal attack but the simple answer is that you're confused. Or willfully ignoring it.


Ah... I'm "confused" because I can recognize that a poll with 46% of respondents self-identifying as Democrats might just be a bit skewed towards the leader of the Democratic party. Um... Really?
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#50 May 18 2011 at 5:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
Ah... I'm "confused"

Yes.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#51 May 18 2011 at 7:23 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
gbaji wrote:
Ah... I'm "confused" because I can recognize that a poll with 46% of respondents self-identifying as Democrats might just be a bit skewed towards the leader of the Democratic party. Um... Really?
Well you certainly were unable to detect that for the last 2 years.

Don't worry, somebody will generate something new to be outraged about by Friday. You won't need to keep backpedaling on this topic once the new rage of the week gets released.



Edited, May 18th 2011 8:24pm by bsphil
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 247 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (247)