Majivo wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
I'm not a genius (feel free to quote that), but I think the point is that he is defunding PP by closing the loop hole. Either move the abortion section out of the building or lose funding.
No, he passed a law which defunds PP but doesn't touch the loophole at all.
Huh? It directly affects the loophole. The relevant portion of the law says the following:
Quote:
Prohibits state agencies from entering contracts with or making grants to any entity that performs abortions or maintains or operates a facility where abortions are performed. Cancels state funding for any current contracts with or grants to any entity that performs abortions or maintains or operates a facility where abortions are performed.
It does not mention Planned Parenthood at all. It only targets PP to the degree that PP does exactly what you said it was ok to block if one did it by passing a law. The law exactly and perfectly targets that loophole we spoke of earlier.
So why do you have a problem with it?
Quote:
It'd be like if I decided that oil companies should pay more taxes but I didn't want to do it to all oil companies, just Exxon, so I found some pictures of the CEO and blackmailed him into returning a few billion to the government. The effect might be the same, but that is not the way to go about it at all.
Lol! Really? You just make stuff up?