Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Don't Say Gay BillFollow

#627 May 05 2011 at 3:28 PM Rating: Excellent
****
6,471 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Nads,

Quote:
Putting "deviant and harmful" aside, it will not change how you go about your day-to-day life at all.


It will make a difference in how religious families raise their children. God tells us something is wrong and the US govn says it's not. You don't see a conflict here for religious families trying to teach their children how to live morally responsible lifes?

I know you, and all the liberals on this site, don't care much for religion, or christianity, but legalizing gay marriage directly undermines it's teachings.




So how does it change their day-to-day?


Explain it, *****.
#628 May 05 2011 at 3:34 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
varusword75 wrote:
God tells us something is wrong and the US govn says it's not.
You knowingly sin, what do you care what God says?
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#629 May 05 2011 at 3:39 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,512 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Nads,

Quote:
Putting "deviant and harmful" aside, it will not change how you go about your day-to-day life at all.


It will make a difference in how religious families raise their children. God tells us something is wrong and the US govn says it's not. You don't see a conflict here for religious families trying to teach their children how to live morally responsible lifes?

I know you, and all the liberals on this site, don't care much for religion, or christianity, but legalizing gay marriage directly undermines it's teachings.


Maybe they should take some personal responsibility in teaching their children rather than rely on the government.

Funny how it's anathema once it's inconvenient.
#630 May 05 2011 at 4:35 PM Rating: Excellent
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Nads,

Quote:
Putting "deviant and harmful" aside, it will not change how you go about your day-to-day life at all.


It will make a difference in how religious families raise their children. God tells us something is wrong and the US govn says it's not. You don't see a conflict here for religious families trying to teach their children how to live morally responsible lifes?

I know you, and all the liberals on this site, don't care much for religion, or christianity, but legalizing gay marriage directly undermines it's teachings.




There are tons of things that the government does that someone, somewhere hates. I bet some of those 'someones' are religious. They somehow get by, though.

They'd get by with this as well.
#631 May 05 2011 at 4:47 PM Rating: Excellent
****
5,684 posts
this thread makes me so ******* horny.

BRB, going to go have hot, wild, anonymous sex.
#632 May 05 2011 at 4:54 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Bardalicious wrote:
BRB, going to go have hot, wild, anonymous sex.
So you're the reason PSN is down!
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#633 May 05 2011 at 4:56 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
15,512 posts
lolgaxe wrote:
Bardalicious wrote:
BRB, going to go have hot, wild, anonymous sex.
So you're the reason PSN is down!
Guess whose credit card he's using to pay for drinks?
#634 May 05 2011 at 5:13 PM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
varusword75 wrote:
A responsible scientist would have studied this aspect as well considering homosexuals are more than 50 times as likely to contract and spread std'.s


A responsible scientist would also realise that as homosexuals make up a much smaller percentage of the population than heterosexuals. Meaning for each one that contracts and STI or STD the percentages are skewed significantly with regard to how likely they are to contract said STI/STD compared to the wider population..

Isn't maths fun?
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#635 May 05 2011 at 5:17 PM Rating: Good
*****
15,512 posts
Nilatai wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
A responsible scientist would have studied this aspect as well considering homosexuals are more than 50 times as likely to contract and spread std'.s


A responsible scientist would also realise that as homosexuals make up a much smaller percentage of the population than heterosexuals. Meaning for each one that contracts and STI or STD the percentages are skewed significantly with regard to how likely they are to contract said STI/STD compared to the wider population..

Isn't maths fun?
Plus, it's not really an indictment of the morality of homosexuals, it's that men are gross and that the f(x), the function relating grossness and the number of males, is exponential.
#636 May 05 2011 at 5:20 PM Rating: Good
*******
50,767 posts
Nilatai wrote:
Isn't maths fun?
Any subject can be fun if you know how to read into it. Want to **** with a religious zealots head? Remind him that God makes all people in his image, which means that God is a little gay.
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#637 May 05 2011 at 5:22 PM Rating: Decent
****
9,395 posts
Quote:
I'd say that a group of people are far more likely to contract and spread a deadly virus falls under the "overwhelming reason to not allow it".


And a married couple is more likely to spread stds, how?

Quote:
You're right, and she didn't. But simply saying that allowing gays to marry will decrease the spread of std's among the homosexual community (which are more than 50 times likely to contract an std) because they'll be in a monogamous relationship is absurd.


No it's not. Monogamy would curb the spread of any stds because those who are being monogamous in a monogamous relationship or marriage, would only be sleeping with the same person.


Quote:
It will normalize a deviant and harmful lifestyle choice.


Explain again why it's supposedly "deviant".

Quote:
It will make a difference in how religious families raise their children. God tells us something is wrong and the US govn says it's not. You don't see a conflict here for religious families trying to teach their children how to live morally responsible lifes?


You can be morally responsible without being religious. Religion is not a pre-requisite for being a good person.

Quote:
Yes I get that you and liberal academia tend to ignore ideas you find distasteful regardless of the scientific relevance


See, this is why I can't possibly fit into your idea of a liberal, even if I find an idea distasteful, I'll go with the science that is most commonly agreed upon worldwide.

Quote:
Sin can lead to disease. That doesn't necessarily mean it will every time.


Sin is irrelevant. There is no such thing. It only exists in the books written buy men a couple thousand years ago.
____________________________
10k before the site's inevitable death or bust

The World Is Not A Cold Dead Place.
Alan Watts wrote:
I am omnipotent insofar as I am the Universe, but I am not an omnipotent in the role of Alan Watts, only cunning


Eske wrote:
I've always read Driftwood as the straight man in varus' double act. It helps if you read all of his posts in the voice of Droopy Dog.
#638 May 05 2011 at 5:27 PM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
Sweetums wrote:
Plus, it's not really an indictment of the morality of homosexuals, it's that men are gross and that the f(x), the function relating grossness and the number of males, is exponential.
True, as a gender men are pretty gross.

lolgaxe wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Isn't maths fun?
Any subject can be fun if you know how to read into it. Want to @#%^ with a religious zealots head? Remind him that God makes all people in his image, which means that God is a little gay.
Naw they get around it by claiming Lucifer did it.

Y'know, I always sympathised more with Lucifer. He was just standing up for his people against a tyrant. He's a fucking hero really.
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#639 May 05 2011 at 5:35 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Nilatai wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Isn't maths fun?
Any subject can be fun if you know how to read into it. Want to @#%^ with a religious zealots head? Remind him that God makes all people in his image, which means that God is a little gay.
Naw they get around it by claiming Lucifer did it.

Y'know, I always sympathised more with Lucifer. He was just standing up for his people against a tyrant. He's a fucking hero really.
God also killed a ******* more people than he did.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#640 May 05 2011 at 5:37 PM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
bsphil wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
lolgaxe wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Isn't maths fun?
Any subject can be fun if you know how to read into it. Want to @#%^ with a religious zealots head? Remind him that God makes all people in his image, which means that God is a little gay.
Naw they get around it by claiming Lucifer did it.

Y'know, I always sympathised more with Lucifer. He was just standing up for his people against a tyrant. He's a fucking hero really.
God also killed a sh*tton more people than he did.
Exactly, as far as I can see, the only people directly killed by Lucifer are Job's family.
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#641 May 06 2011 at 2:58 PM Rating: Good
****
9,526 posts
varusword75 wrote:
homosexuals are more than 50 times as likely to contract and spread std'.s


I'd like to see your source.

Centre for Disease Control wrote:
To date, there are no confirmed cases of female-to-female sexual transmission of HIV in the United States database (K. McDavid, CDC, oral communication, March 2005).

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/women/resources/factsheets/wsw.htm


So lesbians are homosexuals and there is not one confirmed case of lesbians getting HIV from lesbian sex in all of the centre for disease control database... that means that no heterosexuals have ever gotten HIV from heterosexual sex (since 50 times 0 = 0)? Oh wait... that isn't true... lots of hetero people get HIV from hetero sex

Or are lesbians NOT homosexuals?




Edited, May 6th 2011 2:04pm by Olorinus
#642 May 06 2011 at 3:08 PM Rating: Good
***
2,069 posts
Olorinus the Vile wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
homosexuals are more than 50 times as likely to contract and spread std'.s


I'd like to see your source.

Centre for Disease Control wrote:
To date, there are no confirmed cases of female-to-female sexual transmission of HIV in the United States database (K. McDavid, CDC, oral communication, March 2005).

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/women/resources/factsheets/wsw.htm


So lesbians are homosexuals and there is not one confirmed case of lesbians getting HIV from lesbian sex in all of the centre for disease control database... that means that no heterosexuals have ever gotten HIV from heterosexual sex (since 50 times 0 = 0)? Oh wait... that isn't true... lots of hetero people get HIV from hetero sex

Or are lesbians NOT homosexuals?




Edited, May 6th 2011 2:04pm by Olorinus


The Bible says men should not lie with men...doesn't mention ladies.
____________________________
http://www.marriageissogay.com/

Song of the day:
May 26, 2011 -- Transplants
#643 May 06 2011 at 3:12 PM Rating: Good
****
9,526 posts
Belkira wrote:
gbaji wrote:
But then isn't that completely arbitrary? We don't allow polygamy because our current laws don't allow it? Why not? Isn't that just arbitrary discrimination?


Yep. We should legalize it.

I imagine insurance companies and some places of business won't like that much, but oh well.


There is a very good chance it will be legalized in Canada soon. It is going to the Supreme Court in a test case.

***** marriage has been legal in Canada for more than a decade now, and no harm has come of it. It honestly boggles my mind that America doesn't just get with the 21st century already.
#644 May 06 2011 at 3:12 PM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
women should be allowed to marry whoever they want.
#645 May 06 2011 at 3:52 PM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Ailitardif wrote:
The Bible says men should not lie with men...doesn't mention ladies.
Because girl on girl **** is awesome. Smiley: grin
#646 May 11 2011 at 1:21 AM Rating: Excellent
****
4,158 posts
varusword75 wrote:


I know you, and all the liberals on this site, don't care much for religion, or christianity, but legalizing gay marriage directly undermines it's teachings.





Screenshot



____________________________
"If you have selfish, ignorant citizens, you're gonna get selfish, ignorant leaders". Carlin.

#647 May 11 2011 at 3:08 PM Rating: Good
Nilatai wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
Plus, it's not really an indictment of the morality of homosexuals, it's that men are gross and that the f(x), the function relating grossness and the number of males, is exponential.
True, as a gender men are pretty gross.

lolgaxe wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Isn't maths fun?
Any subject can be fun if you know how to read into it. Want to @#%^ with a religious zealots head? Remind him that God makes all people in his image, which means that God is a little gay.
Naw they get around it by claiming Lucifer did it.

Y'know, I always sympathised more with Lucifer. He was just standing up for his people against a tyrant. He's a fucking hero really.


Paradise Lost isn't canon, you stupid fucker.
#648 May 11 2011 at 3:15 PM Rating: Good
Drunken English Bastard
*****
15,268 posts
Kavekk wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Sweetums wrote:
Plus, it's not really an indictment of the morality of homosexuals, it's that men are gross and that the f(x), the function relating grossness and the number of males, is exponential.
True, as a gender men are pretty gross.

lolgaxe wrote:
Nilatai wrote:
Isn't maths fun?
Any subject can be fun if you know how to read into it. Want to @#%^ with a religious zealots head? Remind him that God makes all people in his image, which means that God is a little gay.
Naw they get around it by claiming Lucifer did it.

Y'know, I always sympathised more with Lucifer. He was just standing up for his people against a tyrant. He's a fucking hero really.


Paradise Lost isn't canon, you stupid fucker.
I know that. I don't see any reason for it to be any less valid than any other Christian fiction, though.

Besides, even if you just read the KJV, Yahweh has a much higher body count than Lucifer does.
____________________________
My Movember page
Solrain wrote:
WARs can use semi-colons however we want. I once killed a guy with a semi-colon.

LordFaramir wrote:
ODESNT MATTER CAUSE I HAVE ALCHOLOL IN MY VEINGS BETCH ;3
#649 May 11 2011 at 3:16 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Kavekk wrote:
Paradise Lost isn't canon, you stupid fucker.

This amused me but I lack the ability to use an emoticon properly expressing my amusement.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#650 May 11 2011 at 3:20 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Nilatai wrote:
I know that. I don't see any reason for it to be any less valid than any other Christian fiction, though.

Even if you want to go that route, it's less valid for the same reason that my Bilbo Baggins/Nazgul slash fanfic isn't really relevant to a discussion about Tolkien.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#651 May 11 2011 at 3:21 PM Rating: Decent
Gay Bill!!!!

Wait, what?
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 257 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (257)