Driftwood wrote:
I'm not saying people shouldn't be against it, I'm just saying that the problem is that the people who are against it make a point of trying to make sure that everyone else ends up being against it, to the point of spending hundreds of thousands and even millions of dollars to make sure that legislation doesn't go through.
I feel the same way towards people who push homosexuality acceptace.
Driftwood wrote:
Why don't you show us? You're being just as ridiculous as the other side by acting like you have the manual. You're against it, I get it, I'm fine with that, you just need to be able to admit that you can't say that it's unnatural.
The point is there is no manual of the human body and it doesn't matter if it is or isn't natural. Being blind is natural, but not considered normal. People have made that determination by examining our bodies and how they work.
Driftwood wrote:
We have established that ***** goes in ******, baby comes out 9 months later. What we don't have all the details about is the way the human brain and attraction works. Not completely at least. You're basically saying that procreation is the only reason anyone should have sex ever. And if you really believe that, then it really must suck to not be getting laid.
Basically my argument is based around that at all. You're projecting an argument unto me that I'm not making. People have sex for pleasure all of the time. The FOCUS was on the fact of how the ****** and the ***** compliment each other, the fact that reproduction is a result is just a nice bonus.
As for the brain and attraction, I just saw a commercial of a show talking about people who are in LOVE with objects, i.e. their car. What is your honest opinion of those people?
Nadenu wrote:
I'm not surprised he doesn't get this. And now I'm even more afraid of him.
I'm surprised that I can state the opposition numerous of times and it's completely ignored. I question it to prove the very thing wrong and ALL OF THE SUDDEN people "get it". Actually, I'm not surprised at all. You should read more before posting...
Ugly wrote:
You realize that in order for there to be a normal person to set as the 20/20 standard, you have to have set an usual eye sight level, yes?
I'm fully aware of that. I was focusing on the fact that we determine what is normal by examining our bodies.