Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Question for gbajiFollow

#77 Mar 09 2011 at 10:58 PM Rating: Decent
Worst. Title. Ever!
*****
17,302 posts
gbaji wrote:
Kachi wrote:
Occasionally, after listening to someone speak long enough, it occurs to me that there's no way they could have, or at least should have given their powers of reason, actually graduated from a real college (haven't been wrong yet, but still working on it!). Money can't buy everything, afterall. And intelligence and education are not merely a means to money.


Wow! Give yourself enough of an out there? I suppose your definition of "Real College" is one which didn't produce the person with whom you disagree?


I think he mentioned before, about an accredited college/university. You know, not one that you signed up for after seeing a late night commercial to go to freecollegedegrees12345.com and give them a couple hundred bucks, and they send you a "diploma".

(I'm sure all those commercials for online schooling are completely legitimate! Just like the ones who will make you fast 'free' cash, but you just get a fast 'free' education!)
____________________________
Can't sleep, clown will eat me.
#78 Mar 10 2011 at 12:31 AM Rating: Default
****
9,997 posts
Seems that so far my record for identifying the undereducated is holding strong.

Kavekk wrote:
Quote:
Only many people, maybe not even most people, dislike me, but I don't come here to be liked anyway. Besides, you only get talked to that way if you really work for it. If someone thinks I'm a jerk due to the way I talk to him, among a few others, as far as I'm concerned that's their problem and/or loss. I don't even talk to YOU that way, not that you haven't tried to earn it.


I don't give a sh*t if you slobber bile all over Gbaji. It's the wider implication of what you're saying that's stupid, snobbish and offensive.


And what's that? That people who are obviously unintelligent and/or undereducated shouldn't go around saying dumb **** constantly while acting like they have some superior understanding of the world's ways? Offensive, I'll grant you-- it was intentional. Snobbish, arguably. Stupid, only if I was pointing out something that was so obvious that it didn't need to be said.

@gbaji; Just a 4-year program accredited by a nationally recognized accreditation agency. I won't even give you a hard time about whether it was some ****** little private/community college. So? Yes? No? Don't get me wrong, I've seen some tards graduated from respectable institutions with a bachelors, and I know you don't have a graduate education, but I'm feeling generous.

#79 Mar 10 2011 at 12:50 AM Rating: Good
Kachi wrote:
Seems that so far my record for identifying the undereducated is holding strong.

Kavekk wrote:
Quote:
Only many people, maybe not even most people, dislike me, but I don't come here to be liked anyway. Besides, you only get talked to that way if you really work for it. If someone thinks I'm a jerk due to the way I talk to him, among a few others, as far as I'm concerned that's their problem and/or loss. I don't even talk to YOU that way, not that you haven't tried to earn it.


I don't give a sh*t if you slobber bile all over Gbaji. It's the wider implication of what you're saying that's stupid, snobbish and offensive.


And what's that? That people who are obviously unintelligent and/or undereducated shouldn't go around saying dumb sh*t constantly while acting like they have some superior understanding of the world's ways? Offensive, I'll grant you-- it was intentional. Snobbish, arguably. Stupid, only if I was pointing out something that was so obvious that it didn't need to be said.


It's pretty retarded of you to assume I'm uneducated because I disagree with you, don't you think? If I don't want the government rummaging through my ****, I must have something to hide. You're wrong, by the way.

What's offensive is the assumption, on seeing someone acting like a moron, that they haven't attended university, and what this implies you believe about that group. It's not accurate, because plenty of intelligent and indeed knowledgable people don't go, and as you yourself said, a bunch of morons do. Simply attending is not a sign of anything much.

Anyway, if you haven't figured out elementary stats & logic before you do go then you are, in any case, not the sharpest knife in the draw. Weren't you that guy who started blathering about someone having never taken a stats course when they demonstrated poor understanding? I think your perception of where knowledge and understanding is gained is slanted unduly toward formal education.

But if you want to play the game, sure, whatever. What university did you attend? What degree slash major did you get? What classification slash honour?
#80 Mar 10 2011 at 1:07 AM Rating: Decent
****
9,997 posts
Quote:
It's pretty retarded of you to assume I'm uneducated because I disagree with you, don't you think? If I don't want the government rummaging through my sh*t, I must have something to hide. You're wrong, by the way.


I wasn't assuming you were uneducated. Just trollin'.

Quote:
What's offensive is the assumption, on seeing someone acting like a moron, that they haven't attended university, and what this implies you believe about that group. It's not accurate, because plenty of intelligent and indeed knowledgable people don't go, and as you yourself said, a bunch of morons do. Simply attending is not a sign of anything much.


There's nothing inherently inaccurate about seeing someone constantly act like a moron, and thinking, "It's unlikely that this person was smart enough to graduate from college." I could be wrong about my assessment of them (unlikely in this case) or they could have managed to graduate in spite of that, but most people don't. Is your argument that everyone has the aptitude for college? Because obviously that's not true. If your point is that I should have said, "graduate" instead of "attend," then you missed the hyperbole, but technically you're right.

Further, intelligence is merely a measure of potential, so to be dismissive about an opportunity to realize that potential (getting an education) is the height of stupidity in my book. There are plenty of intelligent dumbasses out there who squandered their potential. I'll take an average intellect with a desire for education over one of them any day, just like I'd take an average computer with a lot of useful information and applications on it over a high spec computer that you can't install anything on.

I've made no secret that I'm completing my doctorate, but I don't give out that much personal information online.
#81 Mar 10 2011 at 3:02 AM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
Kachi wrote:
There's nothing inherently inaccurate about seeing someone constantly act like a moron, and thinking, "It's unlikely that this person was smart enough to graduate from college."

College education is almost entirely about effort and money.
#82 Mar 10 2011 at 6:39 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Kachi, I think I speak from all of us, or at least most of us, when I say "This is an intervention".

According to my numbers and textual analysis, Kachi, you are not smarter than Moe. Moe isn't the smartest one on this board, nor is this board renowned for being the most quick witted. As a subset of this site, perhaps. It's not due to a lack of education, nor some lack of technique or enthusiasm. You just don't have the cognitive processing ability to measure up. I'm not making fun of you, nor do I mean you much disrespect, but your logic and rationale are profoundly flawed.

Don't shoot the messenger, but perhaps you should take a step back and reevaluate your position, and form a more rational and circumspect argument? Think through things occasionally? Perhaps to their logical conclusions?

Just a thought.

Good Luck.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#83 Mar 10 2011 at 6:49 AM Rating: Default
Avatar
****
7,566 posts
Just out of curiosity why does a piece of paper you paid 20K for matter in anything? Practical experience > book learning. If you think a piece of paper dictates your superior knowledge over others you are out to lunch. When I hire people I hire them based on practical knowledge and past experience. I don't even bother glancing at college because frankly education means sh*t in the real world. You might understand the fundamentals of the material, but with no real experience, you are useless.

As they say, its not what you know its who you know, and if money walks its ******** that talks.

lol@ college being an important factor in anything.

Edited, Mar 10th 2011 7:51am by rdmcandie
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#84 Mar 10 2011 at 7:09 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
Just out of curiosity why does a piece of paper you paid 20K for matter in anything? Practical experience > book learning. If you think a piece of paper dictates your superior knowledge over others you are out to lunch. When I hire people I hire them based on practical knowledge and past experience. I don't even bother glancing at college because frankly education means sh*t in the real world. You might understand the fundamentals of the material, but with no real experience, you are useless.

As they say, its not what you know its who you know, and if money walks its bullsh*t that talks.

lol@ college being an important factor in anything.

Edited, Mar 10th 2011 7:51am by rdmcandie


Properly preparing for a profession is still valuable. Which is what most people end up wanting to pay for via college. I wouldn't so easily discount a degree if I were you, nor weight it as highly as you appear to weight networking and such, but also not hold it so near and dear as Kachi. Undervaluing is as bad as overvaluing.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#85 Mar 10 2011 at 7:18 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,566 posts
A college degree in building construction is mostly irrelevant to the trade, and most other tradesmen I talk to feel the same way. While they do gain the fundamental knowledge over the course of a year or two the applied knowledge is not there. Upon graduating most college students retain a fraction of what they had learned.

While it may be applicable to certain fields, it is hardly a must have for any field. Someone that worked as a framer for 1 year has more knowledge in the trade then someone who graduates with a 2 year diploma. In my line of work experience > education. I would never hire a fresh college student solely based on the fact they went to college. However if they had prior experience before going to college then they might have a shot. But its the experience not the college that jumps off the page.

As is the case for most jobs, and why college grads are one of the highest unemployed groups. They have no experience and that 20K piece of paper is not a testament to anything, considering most don't retain everything they were taught.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#86 Mar 10 2011 at 7:27 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
If you're educated, but not experienced, then you show an aptitude for the field. This means you should be able to work in this field, but given that you have no experience, I can pay you in peanuts.

If you're experienced, but not educated, it means you should be able to work in the field, but you're going to expect more money to do so. There is however, depending on the field, a good possibility that you're not up to speed on the latest technology/ideas in the field.

____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#87 Mar 10 2011 at 9:52 AM Rating: Good
gbaji wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
If men had babies, I imagine the situation would be vastly different.


Yes. It would be women's pay that would outstrip men, and the men would be complaining about it, and it would be the men insisting that anyone who didn't agree with them that this was horribly unfair were sexist bigots. It's biology, not bigotry that creates this difference.


It's cute that you think that. But since men, most notably white men, in this country have had the majority of the power since the beginning of this country, I'm pretty sure maternity leave would look a hell of a lot more like it does in Europe.

And for the record, I never said a word about bigotry. That was all you, baby.
#88 Mar 10 2011 at 9:59 AM Rating: Decent
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
And for the record, I never said a word about bigotry. That was all you, baby.

Implication is a *****.
#89 Mar 10 2011 at 10:10 AM Rating: Good
MoebiusLord wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
And for the record, I never said a word about bigotry. That was all you, baby.

Implication is a *****.


So speaking about any unfairness is implying bigotry now? Interesting.
#90 Mar 10 2011 at 10:14 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
gbaji wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
If men had babies, I imagine the situation would be vastly different.


Yes. It would be women's pay that would outstrip men, and the men would be complaining about it, and it would be the men insisting that anyone who didn't agree with them that this was horribly unfair were sexist bigots. It's biology, not bigotry that creates this difference.


It's cute that you think that. But since men, most notably white men, in this country have had the majority of the power since the beginning of this country, I'm pretty sure maternity leave would look a hell of a lot more like it does in Europe.

And for the record, I never said a word about bigotry. That was all you, baby.
If men had to bear the babies, humans would be hangin' with the dinosaurs in the fossil record right now.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#91 Mar 10 2011 at 10:20 AM Rating: Decent
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
And for the record, I never said a word about bigotry. That was all you, baby.

Implication is a *****.


So speaking about any unfairness is implying bigotry now? Interesting.

Zip your pants up, your fallacy is showing.
#92 Mar 10 2011 at 10:34 AM Rating: Good
MoebiusLord wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
And for the record, I never said a word about bigotry. That was all you, baby.

Implication is a *****.


So speaking about any unfairness is implying bigotry now? Interesting.

Zip your pants up, your fallacy is showing.


Smiley: dubious
#93 Mar 10 2011 at 10:47 AM Rating: Good
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
MoebiusLord wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
And for the record, I never said a word about bigotry. That was all you, baby.

Implication is a *****.

So speaking about any unfairness is implying bigotry now? Interesting.

Zip your pants up, your fallacy is showing.

Smiley: dubious

Yeah, it's likely so ingrained in your thought process that you don't notice it, but you make a logical leap not supported by the initial statement. Your response is a fallacy. It has the benefit of allowing me to make a pun since it sounds like phallus.

I'm sure you do know what it means. Your second response has be benefit of allowing me to post in a condescending manner to assert my superior thinker power.
#94 Mar 10 2011 at 11:35 AM Rating: Good
****
6,471 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
A college degree in building construction is mostly irrelevant to the trade, and most other tradesmen I talk to feel the same way. While they do gain the fundamental knowledge over the course of a year or two the applied knowledge is not there. Upon graduating most college students retain a fraction of what they had learned.

While it may be applicable to certain fields, it is hardly a must have for any field. Someone that worked as a framer for 1 year has more knowledge in the trade then someone who graduates with a 2 year diploma. In my line of work experience > education. I would never hire a fresh college student solely based on the fact they went to college. However if they had prior experience before going to college then they might have a shot. But its the experience not the college that jumps off the page.

As is the case for most jobs, and why college grads are one of the highest unemployed groups. They have no experience and that 20K piece of paper is not a testament to anything, considering most don't retain everything they were taught.


I hardly think that you're qualified to speak about every profession that's out there. I agree that it's not necessary for your particular one (I'm in architecture, so I've got a decent enough idea of the building construction industry). But there are plenty of of fields where a formal education helps a ton. Speaking personally, I believe that my education helped me greatly in my creative thinking and ability to express an idea. Good skills to have for design, and ones that are often difficult to cultivate in a typical architect's office. College made it easier to think outside the box, so to speak.

Side note: In my experience, people who didn't attend college always seem to be the ones with a militant opinion about it (with the exception of Kachi, I guess). And they always seem to be in construction.
#95REDACTED, Posted: Mar 10 2011 at 11:53 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) It's the opportunity to learn from a lot of people much more knowledgeable than you that's valuable.
#96 Mar 10 2011 at 12:07 PM Rating: Good
Kachi wrote:
Granted I tend to take things Moe posts at face value, which I clearly shouldn't, that's usually because I honestly can't tell if he is being dumb or sarcastic, which may not speak highly of me, but doesn't speak that highly of him, either.

Working as intended, actually.
Kachi wrote:
Geniuses tell me that I'm the smartest person THEY know, k?

And I'm a chick with 36-24-36. Look, it's fun to lie on the internet!
Kachi wrote:
This is ****-around time for me, so it doesn't mean a lot that a handful of anonymous nobodies don't marvel at my intellect.

Take a look around some time, dumbass. It's a gaming site's WayOOT board. I hate to burst your bubble, but this is d:ck around time for just about everyone who posts here.
#97 Mar 10 2011 at 12:36 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Kachi wrote:
Allegory wrote:
Kachi wrote:
There's nothing inherently inaccurate about seeing someone constantly act like a moron, and thinking, "It's unlikely that this person was smart enough to graduate from college."

College education is almost entirely about effort and money.


Haha, no. Almost entirely about effort, yes (provided you're not simply too dumb, but that's what the SAT and ACT attempt to prevent), and money is an important factor (though between loans, grants, and scholarships, few people who would be successful in college find that they can't go at a very reasonable cost), but I'd love to know where you're living that almost everyone has the aptitude for college. Do you remember high school? Were there never people you knew weren't going to cut it in college?


Nah, I'd agree with Allegory on this one. College education is about money because without money you can't go or stay there. It's about effort because if you don't try you'll fail your classes. Aptitude I never found played a huge role. You brought up high school - but the people I knew in high school who went to college were the people who put in the effort and had the means. I wouldn't classify them as inherently smarter, besides being smart enough to realize putting effort into school work matters if you want to go to college.

Sure, people with mental retardation won't make it to college, but the kid who works his or her butt off and gets B in high school will, while the "smart" kid who aced the PSATs but dropped out due to wanting to be a noncomfortist (or just being lazy) won't.

Aptitude might play a role in some majors, but college is about effort and money much more than "aptitude." If you work your butt off and are still failing, change your major Smiley: lol
#98 Mar 10 2011 at 12:39 PM Rating: Excellent
LockeColeMA wrote:
If you work your butt off and are still failing, change your major Smiley: lol

Communications!
#99 Mar 10 2011 at 12:45 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Quote:
I'd love to know where you're living that almost everyone has the aptitude for college
I'd love to know where you're living that that isn't the case. College/university undergrads are a fucking joke.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#100 Mar 10 2011 at 1:26 PM Rating: Good
Muggle@#%^er
******
20,024 posts
Quote:
While it may be applicable to certain fields, it is hardly a must have for any field. Someone that worked as a framer for 1 year has more knowledge in the trade then someone who graduates with a 2 year diploma. In my line of work experience > education. I would never hire a fresh college student solely based on the fact they went to college. However if they had prior experience before going to college then they might have a shot. But its the experience not the college that jumps off the page.


HA, there's no way in hell I'm hiring a chemist without a degree. Or a doctor. Or a lawyer. Or an engineer. Or a mathematician.

I don't care how much experience they have.

I can't comment on agriculture and such, because I know nothing about what any jobs they create would entail. Y'know, beyond carrying hay to a truck.

I definitely want anyone doing wiring or plumbing work on my house to be certified. I don't care if they have some kind of degree, but I do care that they've gone through training programs. For basic things, experience is probably more than enough of course. But if I need some kind of large-scale or specific job, I'll need someone who has been taught how to do those large scale jobs. Experience doesn't necessarily provide that.

If you want to be a chef, you don't need to go to school, no. But it's hugely beneficial--you'll learn vastly improved knife skills. You'll learn the chemistry behind flavors/cooking styles. And you'll be exposed to many types of cuisine and ingredients. Experience can take you very, very far in this field. But it's going to be much, much harder for you.

The same is true for those that want to do fashion design--you'll learn different types of seams, lines, fabric-types, etc. And you'll be put in an environment that forces you to focus on style/technique, with the availability of criticism.

You'll want to go to beauty school to learn hair-cutting techniques (along with anything else you want to learn). Many states issue cosmetology licenses following an examination, and it will be much harder without going to school. Especially since you need to hope that whoever taught you knew what they were doing.

There are many, many jobs that don't require a degree--you are right. But of those that don't, there are many that require training of another kind. And some of those remaining are possible without a degree, but vastly easier with education. There are jobs where pure experience is enough, of course. And there are jobs that require none at all.

But experience isn't always enough.
____________________________
IDrownFish wrote:
Anyways, you all are horrible, @#%^ed up people

lolgaxe wrote:
Never underestimate the healing power of a massive dong.
#101 Mar 10 2011 at 4:50 PM Rating: Good
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
Sure, people with mental retardation won't make it to college, but the kid who works his or her butt off and gets B in high school will, while the "smart" kid who aced the PSATs but dropped out due to wanting to be a noncomfortist (or just being lazy) won't.


This.

Kachi's belief that attending and/or graduating from college is a determinant of intelligence disproves itself.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 262 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (262)