Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Yes we Chan!Follow

#77 Jan 25 2011 at 2:02 PM Rating: Default
Ugly,

Still having trouble with reading comp I see.


Quote:
I don't take pleasure from killing living creatures


Now I want to know how you think this implies i'm a vegan or vegetarian?



#78 Jan 25 2011 at 2:06 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Locked,

Quote:
Don't quote the amendment if you can't understand judicial review or our system of law.


I understand that just because a couple of radical lefty judges say one thing doesn't make it right.



Radical lefty judges from the 19th century? Smiley: dubious
#79 Jan 25 2011 at 2:28 PM Rating: Good
LockeColeMA wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Locked,

Quote:
Don't quote the amendment if you can't understand judicial review or our system of law.


I understand that just because a couple of radical lefty judges say one thing doesn't make it right.

Radical lefty judges from the 19th century? Smiley: dubious
They must have been really ******* radical.
#80 Jan 25 2011 at 2:35 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
LockeColeMA wrote:
Radical lefty judges from the 19th century? Smiley: dubious

Their judicial activism meant that children had to be able to crawl before being allowed to haul coal in the steel foundry. Ruined America forever with their radical ways.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#81REDACTED, Posted: Jan 25 2011 at 2:53 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Locked,
#82 Jan 25 2011 at 3:26 PM Rating: Good
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
yet another "liberals are ruining the world" thread... I totally see the resemblance now. I've learned the error in my ways..
#83 Jan 25 2011 at 3:35 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Ugly,

Still having trouble with reading comp I see.


Quote:
I don't take pleasure from killing living creatures


Now I want to know how you think this implies i'm a vegan or vegetarian?



Where do you think meat comes from?
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#84 Jan 25 2011 at 3:40 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Ugly,

Still having trouble with reading comp I see.


Quote:
I don't take pleasure from killing living creatures


You won't kill 'em, but you'll eat 'em!
#85REDACTED, Posted: Jan 25 2011 at 4:09 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Nadenu,
#86REDACTED, Posted: Jan 25 2011 at 4:10 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) alma,
#87 Jan 25 2011 at 4:32 PM Rating: Good
The All Knowing
Avatar
*****
10,265 posts
varusword75 wrote:
alma,

Almalieque the Most Wonderful wrote:
yet another "liberals are ruining the world" thread


And they are.

Of course if you don't think being a slave to big govn is a bad thing then I can see how you might not agree with this assessment.



You do realize that politics in general are subjective and don't necessarily have a "right" or "wrong" answer? What may seem to you as "ruining the world" may be seen as "enhancing the world" for others.

This is why I'm a independent. I don't think a single party or political group can 100% have what I believe as the "right" answer.
#88 Jan 25 2011 at 4:57 PM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Nadenu,

I said I don't take pleasure in killing them. Jesus you liberals can't read for sh*t.

But you sure enjoy the end result, don't ya? More so than liberals enjoy the results of dead fetuses. Which they don't take joy in "killing". Well, some probably do.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#89 Jan 25 2011 at 7:06 PM Rating: Decent
Prodigal Son
******
20,643 posts
varusword75 wrote:
I know you're new at this so let me help you. US constitutional rights don't extend to foreigners. Simple enough for ya? And no if someone is in my house playing gangsta rap I can kick them out; just like the president could have. It's clear you're more concerned about upsetting the chi-coms than korean vets.

Of course we need to worry about offending the chi-coms. As a rabid capitalist you should be the first to realize that China is the basis for our consumerist society. I mean, where do you think your CD changer came from? If we **** off china, they'll stop selling us cheap crap.
____________________________
publiusvarus wrote:
we all know liberals are well adjusted american citizens who only want what's best for society. While conservatives are evil money grubbing scum who only want to sh*t on the little man and rob the world of its resources.
#90 Jan 25 2011 at 7:25 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,568 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Ugly,

Still having trouble with reading comp I see.


Quote:
I don't take pleasure from killing living creatures


Now I want to know how you think this implies i'm a vegan or vegetarian?



Where do you think meat comes from?


Obviously God just whisked it onto his plate. Duh.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#91 Jan 25 2011 at 9:18 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
I commented on it in June 2008 when it was something like 5.5% which was .4% higher than expected and the first real sign in that sector that the economy was falling apart (there were earlier signs in other segments of the economy, of course). Then I commented again a couple months later in September when it had slipped to 6.2%. Of course, by that time it was plainly obvious that the GOP praised "Bush economy" was built purely on a bubble and had no actual substance at all. By the time Bush left office, it was at 7.6%

So, yeah, I did mention Bush's 5% (well, 5.5%) unemployment. And I was correct to do so since it was a pretty accurate indicator of how the economy had no clothes.


While I can't say for sure who was involved, I do recall repeatedly having to respond to posts on this forum back in 2003-2006 time frame saying that the "economy was in the dumpster". When I'd list off the economic factors (GDP growth, inflation, CPI rate, unemployment), the two most common responses I got were that unemployment was "bad" because it was higher than the sub-5% range is had been in and that wages were "flat".

This was all well before the economic effects of the sub-prime mortgage mess really hit us. And frankly, I suspect most people latched onto those as the only tangible things they could. I honestly believe that when most people (most liberals anyway) spoke about the economy being bad back then, they weren't really measuring the private economy at all, but were looking at how much revenue the government was taking in. So lower taxes == "bad economy" somewhat automatically.

Obviously, that's just my own take on it, but it's the one common factor that I could find. Doubly so when once the asked for factors were listed off, most of the same posters would turn the topic to discussions of social spending that wasn't getting done (not enough help for the poor, nor enough housing assistance, not enough health insurance coverage, etc). Dunno how related this is to the specifics of this topic, but it was something I noticed during that time period. I just remember always being surprised at how often people would just repeat that the economy was "bad".


The economy is "bad" now. This is what "bad" looks like. I suppose it's also possible that most posters are too young to remember a time when the economy was actually bad in the US. It's all relative, I guess.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#92 Jan 25 2011 at 9:26 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
While I can't say for sure who was involved, I do recall repeatedly having to respond to posts on this forum back in 2003-2006 time frame saying that the "economy was in the dumpster". When I'd list off the economic factors (GDP growth, inflation, CPI rate, unemployment), the two most common responses I got were that unemployment was "bad" because it was higher than the sub-5% range is had been in and that wages were "flat".

This was all well before the economic effects of the sub-prime mortgage mess really hit us. And frankly, I suspect most people latched onto those as the only tangible things they could.

Yeah, I suppose when folks who were warning about the economy were proven correct while your praise was proven to be misplaced, it's easiest to just call them terrible ignorant hacks for having more foresight than you.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#93 Jan 25 2011 at 9:43 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
While I can't say for sure who was involved, I do recall repeatedly having to respond to posts on this forum back in 2003-2006 time frame saying that the "economy was in the dumpster". When I'd list off the economic factors (GDP growth, inflation, CPI rate, unemployment), the two most common responses I got were that unemployment was "bad" because it was higher than the sub-5% range is had been in and that wages were "flat".

This was all well before the economic effects of the sub-prime mortgage mess really hit us. And frankly, I suspect most people latched onto those as the only tangible things they could.

Yeah, I suppose when folks who were warning about the economy were proven correct while your praise was proven to be misplaced, it's easiest to just call them terrible ignorant hacks for having more foresight than you.



Foresight and Hindsight are usually just buzz words. The American Economy was great in 2000 and declined in the usual way economies decline under new leadership. It picked back up on the back of the War machine, like economies usually do. (It is widely considered that if Germany didn't start world war two the economies of the world would have taken another 5+ years to rebound from the depression) Bush was a good leader in his first term, his policies were solid, and the economy was decent.

The Bubble burst had nothing really to do with government at all, it was something that was destined to occur. The resulting impact on the economy was because of failed institutions attempts to make a quick buck. Private banking and investment companies were the reason the economy collapsed, not because of Bush Whitehouse policy. More so it was a lack of policy if anything. The thing about the whole thing is, people blame obama for this economy being slow and the unemployment rate being such and such, when again it is more or less out of his control.

The banking industry holds most if not all the responsibility for this current economic drain, and that is mostly because everything in society revolves around credit, the US government, the place you work, your house, your car, your insurance, everything is based on credit. This is a bank controlled system, people can't hire new people if they can't get credit to pay/fund their current employees, banks won't give credit because they can't get credit. Etc etc etc.

Blaming one party or another for the state of the economy in a credit based society, which is mostly out of government control and mostly private is bad in general. This is what capitalism is about, purchasing power, and credit.

Just look at Modern money mechanics and the fractional reserve system, the economies of most western nations (US, Canada, Germany, UK, Aussie, France the main ones) are all run on fractional reserve systems. Designed by banks.

The blame game is stupid, everyone knows what the problem is, but money is louder than words, an until politicians in "democracies" stop bending over bucks and gifts it won't change. No matter who is in power.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#94 Jan 25 2011 at 9:50 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
rdmcandie wrote:
Foresight and Hindsight are usually just buzz words. The American Economy was great in 2000 and declined in the usual way economies decline under new leadership.

Just how far back do we need to push this clock? I reference June 2008, Gbaji jumps to 2003 and now you're prattling on about 2000.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#95 Jan 26 2011 at 1:45 AM Rating: Good
******
27,272 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Just how far back do we need to push this clock? I reference June 2008, Gbaji jumps to 2003 and now you're prattling on about 2000.
In another dozen or so posts we'll be talking about Nobby's age.
#96 Jan 26 2011 at 5:39 AM Rating: Good
It all went wrong sometime in the pleistocene.
#97REDACTED, Posted: Jan 26 2011 at 8:38 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ugly,
#98 Jan 26 2011 at 8:57 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
Just how far back do we need to push this clock? I reference June 2008, Gbaji jumps to 2003 and now you're prattling on about 2000.
In another dozen or so posts we'll be talking about Nobby's age.
Nobby who?
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#99 Jan 26 2011 at 9:01 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Ugly,

Quote:
But you sure enjoy the end result


Semantics are cool.
Semantics is the game you're playing. Since people get abortions, they must enjoy killing fetuses. By that logic, if you eat meat, you must enjoy killing animals. What's up murderer?
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#100REDACTED, Posted: Jan 26 2011 at 9:06 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ugly,
#101 Jan 26 2011 at 9:08 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
varusword75 wrote:
I enjoy killing cows.


Honestly, the cows get off lucky if you only enjoy killing them. Goats might not be so lucky... Smiley: rolleyes
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 248 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (248)