rdmcandie wrote:
It is my firm belief that Israel should never have been given the land rights to the region in the first place.
They weren't. Perhaps you should study the history leading up to the formation of the nation of Israel instead of just looking at the last 20-30 years. Just a suggestion...
Quote:
In my honest opinion of in this day and age the site where Israel sits should be an international religious zone. It should not be controlled by any one nation, and it should not be subject to hostility. It is the birth place of the three major religions in the area, and should be a center of peace, and religious prosperity, akin to the Vatican City which is technically a "nation" unto its own. Giving control of this beacon or religion to one specific religious sect, was asking for trouble.
You get that this is more or less what the original nation of Israel was? It failed (literally the day the UK stopped militarily supporting it) because every single one of the neighbor Arab states invaded in order to turn the whole thing into an Arab state. They didn't want to "share", so they tried to take the whole thing for themselves.
The Palestinians got caught in the middle. But the primary source of their misery is not Israel, but the states of Syria, Jordan, and Egypt who basically used them to fight a war and then screwed them over big time when things didn't go their way. And then, they screwed them over even more during the peace agreement which followed. The reason Palestinians live in refuge camps is because those Arab nations didn't keep their promises to them. One can argue that they did this specifically to create an underclass which would be viewed with sadness by ignorant westerners and help strengthen the Arab position.
It works. Doesn't it? Put a group of people into misery and play on western sensibilities for the underdog. Brilliant strategy. Perhaps you should stop and look at who put them in those camps and why before you leap to conclusions though. It's not as clean cut as you likely think.