Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Gay Agenda rears its head.Follow

#1 Jan 13 2011 at 7:34 AM Rating: Good
Avatar
****
7,566 posts
After years of pandering to the homosexuals of canada, and giving them what they want. Tth Gay agenda has finally taken its first attack on our society.

http://ca.news.yahoo.com/dire-straits-money-nothing-censored-broadcast-panel-rules-20110112-175448-551.html

Quote:
OTTAWA - The 1980s song "Money for Nothing" by the British rock band Dire Straits has been deemed unacceptable for play on Canadian radio.
In a ruling released Wednesday, the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council says the song contravenes the human rights clauses of the Canadian Association of Broadcasters' Code of Ethics and Equitable Portrayal Code.
A listener to radio station CHOZ-FM in St. John's, N.L., complained last year that the song includes the word "******" in its lyrics and is discriminatory to gays.
The broadcaster argued that the song had been played countless times since its release decades ago and has won music industry awards.
A CBSC panel concluded that the word "******," even if once acceptable, has evolved to become unacceptable in most circumstances.
The panel noted that "Money for Nothing" would be acceptable for broadcast if suitably edited.


Not only have they stolen one of my favorite songs to work to. They have also stolen a word I use daily. Now how am I supposed to identify a bundle of sticks with one easy word, while listening to the sweet sounds of Money for Nothing. It is appalling.

____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#2 Jan 13 2011 at 7:37 AM Rating: Excellent
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts
You're gonna have problems getting cigarettes from people as well.
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#3 Jan 13 2011 at 7:42 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
Now how am I supposed to [...] listening to the sweet sounds of Money for Nothing.
You could try buying the album. Revolutionary idea.

I don't see the big deal. Most derogatory/curse words are filtered out on Canadian radio stations already. If we're going to do it, then it probably should involve this one as well. If you want to take issue with filtering at all, then you've got an argument.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#4 Jan 13 2011 at 7:48 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
After years of pandering to the homosexuals of canada, and giving them what they want. Tth Gay agenda has finally taken its first attack on our society

Gay's are bad-***.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#5 Jan 13 2011 at 7:50 AM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,566 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:
rdmcandie wrote:
Now how am I supposed to [...] listening to the sweet sounds of Money for Nothing.
You could try buying the album. Revolutionary idea.

I don't see the big deal. Most derogatory/curse words are filtered out on Canadian radio stations already. If we're going to do it, then it probably should involve this one as well. If you want to take issue with filtering at all, then you've got an argument.



I do not believe filtering should be done at all tbh. In any way,shape,or form. That includes editing movies on TV for content. Its a joke. As for buying an album, why waste money when I can download it for free on the internet. I haven't bought music in 10 years, I doubt this will make start now.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#6 Jan 13 2011 at 7:57 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
As for buying an album, why waste money when I can download it for free on the internet. I haven't bought music in 10 years, I doubt this will make start now.
Beggers can't be choosers.



____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#7 Jan 13 2011 at 8:00 AM Rating: Good
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
That songs sucks anyway. Good on ya, GaysofCanada!
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#8 Jan 13 2011 at 8:01 AM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
As for buying an album, why waste money when I can download it for free on the internet. I haven't bought music in 10 years, I doubt this will make start now.
The main point was that it doesn't matter what can or can't be aired on radio, as you have other ways to access it. Nice to see you supporting the people who provide you with that entertainment though.

rdmcandie wrote:
I do not believe filtering should be done at all tbh. In any way,shape,or form. That includes editing movies on TV for content. Its a joke.
I believe in filtering between certain hours. Mainly when young children are typically awake. The rest of the time, anyone listening should be responsible enough to deal with something as simple as "words".
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#9 Jan 13 2011 at 9:10 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Quote:
A listener to radio station CHOZ-FM in St. John's, N.L., complained last year that the song includes the word "******" in its lyrics and is discriminatory to gays.

lolwut?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#10 Jan 13 2011 at 9:40 AM Rating: Good
**
474 posts
Tare wrote:
That songs sucks anyway.


That's arguable but that song does take me back to the days when MTV was about music and not narcissistic Jersey asshats.
#11 Jan 13 2011 at 9:54 AM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Did I mention that I don't like censorship in any of it's forms?

But my care value is relatively low, because I'm not a Canadian radio listener.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#12 Jan 13 2011 at 9:55 AM Rating: Decent
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
10,179 posts
Score: Decent

ZOMG, I touchedanerve!
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#13 Jan 13 2011 at 10:06 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Back in the day, I'd hear Lou Reed's "Walk on the Wild Side" on the radio. Then I started noticing edits.

First it was stuff like "But Candy never lost her head, even when she was [...dead air...]..."
Then it was "And the [...dead air...] girls go 'doot doot...'"
Then they cut out the entire verse about Candy and the line about the colored girls, going straight into the doots.

Then I heard it the other day and it was all restored. Go figure. And I know different stations can play different edits (at least here... in AMERICA!) but it was still a little jarring to hear it in one piece again.

Edited, Jan 13th 2011 10:06am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#14 Jan 13 2011 at 10:32 AM Rating: Excellent
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
It's funny. Making a rather sweeping, completely subjective statement, I'd say that here (in AMERICA!) there is far more censorship on the whole. I mean, you can't even say "***" on TV. At least not here in the South.
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#15 Jan 13 2011 at 10:40 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Whenever I hear "Brown Eyed Girl" these days it seems like they censor or repeat a line instead of saying "Making love in the green grass." Replace it with another "Hoppin' and a-skippin'... behind the stadium."

Always made me laugh. Oh noes, teh sex! Smiley: lol

Edited, Jan 13th 2011 11:40am by LockeColeMA
#16 Jan 13 2011 at 11:08 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Tare wrote:
I mean, you can't even say "***" on TV. At least not here in the South.

Take it up with the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council, Eskimo Queen.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#17 Jan 13 2011 at 11:21 AM Rating: Excellent
YAY! Canaduhian
*****
10,293 posts
Jophiel wrote:
Tare wrote:
I mean, you can't even say "***" on TV. At least not here in the South.

Take it up with the Canadian Broadcast Standards Council, Eskimo Queen.


They'll learn ya, you ******!
____________________________
What's bred in the bone will not out of the flesh.
#18 Jan 13 2011 at 11:24 AM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
Tare wrote:
It's funny. Making a rather sweeping, completely subjective statement,
The extinction of the word ****** is item #4.1b on the Gays Agenda.
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#19 Jan 13 2011 at 11:30 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
I'm still not sure how it's "discriminatory" though. Was the complainer upset that the straight people didn't also get their own jet airplane?

Edited, Jan 13th 2011 11:31am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#20 Jan 13 2011 at 12:54 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
Tare wrote:
It's funny. Making a rather sweeping, completely subjective statement, I'd say that here (in AMERICA!) there is far more censorship on the whole. I mean, you can't even say "***" on TV. At least not here in the South.


Um, do they not show Two and a Half Men over there? Every other word on that show is "***."
#21 Jan 13 2011 at 1:27 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Elinda wrote:
Tare wrote:
It's funny. Making a rather sweeping, completely subjective statement,
The extinction of the word ****** is item #4.1b on the Gays Agenda.


That's so cheerleader who like can't like say smart stuff.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#22 Jan 13 2011 at 1:34 PM Rating: Decent
Avatar
****
7,566 posts
Uglysasquatch wrote:


rdmcandie wrote:
I do not believe filtering should be done at all tbh. In any way,shape,or form. That includes editing movies on TV for content. Its a joke.
I believe in filtering between certain hours. Mainly when young children are typically awake. The rest of the time, anyone listening should be responsible enough to deal with something as simple as "words".


You know I just can't agree with you. At all. Where are mom and pop, or the caregiver they should be watching their young children, there by controlling the content that they view/hear/read. There is no reason why they can't is there?

As for this particular case and many others like it. Turn the damn channel if you don't like whats on. Many people do like the entertainment provided, if you are so hurt/enraged by it, change it. Why should I have to deal with censor of songs and tv shows/movies I enjoy because Peter Puffer said it hurt his feelings.

Let me tell you a story about Brokeback mountain. I didn't see it. Heard it was a movie about ******, I don't want to see that ****. So I didn't, end of story. Let me tell you another about the passion of the christ, I heard it was a religious movie, I don't care for that ****, so I didn't see it. End of story.

Man invented a wonderful device its called the tuner nob. It allows you to change radio stations with ease, we even expanded on this in vehicles to the point you can do it right from your steering wheel, or in the home with a remote control. If this guy had an issue he could simply change the god damn channel when the song came on.

I ******* hate stupid people like this, and I absolutely hate this new bleeding heart generation.
____________________________
HEY GOOGLE. **** OFF YOU. **** YOUR ******** SEARCH ENGINE IN ITS ******* ****** BINARY ***. ALL DAY LONG.

#23 Jan 13 2011 at 1:40 PM Rating: Good
Skelly Poker Since 2008
*****
16,781 posts
rdmcandie wrote:
Why should I have to deal with censor of songs and tv shows/movies I enjoy because Peter Puffer said it hurt his feelings.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's your constitutional right to watch uncensored tv.

Media is not censored by the government. It's censored by the industry itself. They're completely within their rights to do this. If you don't like the product you can boycott it.



Edited, Jan 13th 2011 8:43pm by Elinda
____________________________
Alma wrote:
I lost my post
#24 Jan 13 2011 at 1:44 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT

Haha... it's funny because it's true. Cheerleaders are morons.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#25 Jan 13 2011 at 1:45 PM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Quote:
You know I just can't agree with you. At all. Where are mom and pop, or the caregiver they should be watching their young children, there by controlling the content that they view/hear/read. There is no reason why they can't is there?
You're completely entitled to your view. But parents can't be there the entire time their kid is in front of a TV or while the radio is on. I mean, unless you think it's a good idea to turn the tv/radio up really loud so you can hear it and know to run to it and shut it off/change stations whilst you're in the middle of taking a shit, in another room folding laundry, doing dishes or any other common household activity.

You don't want it censored, fine. I'm not going to fight you on getting censorship removed. It's not that big of a deal to me, but given a preference, I have no issue with censorship between say, 6am-8pm.

Really, I think the whole problem for you is that you either need to pay for things now and stop mooching off of other people's work, or that you need to put in an effort to illegally obtain your things for free.

Edited, Jan 13th 2011 3:52pm by Uglysasquatch
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#26 Jan 13 2011 at 1:46 PM Rating: Excellent
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Elinda wrote:
rdmcandie wrote:
Why should I have to deal with censor of songs and tv shows/movies I enjoy because Peter Puffer said it hurt his feelings.
Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's your constitutional right to watch uncensored tv.

Media is not censored by the government. It's censored by the industry itself. They're completely within their rights to do this. If you don't like the product you can boycott it.



Edited, Jan 13th 2011 8:43pm by Elinda
He has no constitutional rights.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

« Previous 1 2 3 4
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 274 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (274)