Eske Esquire wrote:
I'm bookmarking this thread and using it for reference whenever gbaji suggests that he's unbiased.
I suspect you don't really know what "unbiased" means, or are using it very selectively. Possibly even both.
Quote:
Jesus man. I cannot for the life of me believe that anyone could believe the sh*t that you come up with. Reload a web page? Really? REALLY??
Yes. Really. I'm still unsure why people keep thinking this is so unusual. If *anyone* other than Palin said those exact words in a tweet, none of you would assume it was a gun reference and not a web page reference. We do "reload" web pages, right? Do you seriously want me to link to the hundreds of thousands of uses of the word "reload" on the internet which refer to reloading a page and not a firearm? Want to take a wild guess what the ratio is there?
I can only respond to what I'm presented. I was presented with two links: A map with cross hairs on it, and a tweet saying not to retreat but to reload, with a request to visit a facebook page. Based on that information
and only that information there's no reason to assume that the tweet was a firearm reference. The first and obvious assumption to anyone not acting in a biased manner is that it was a reference to loading a web page and not a gun.
You are so blinded by your own bias that you can't see what is really a biased response. I'll ask again that you think about what it means to be biased. You are judging Palin's words based on your own starting assumptions. You assume she's a gun-toting hick advocating violence and so you interpret her words in that context. That's textbook bias. I'm interpreting the words in the context given and with no bias. It's a reference to a web page and a request to reload. The correct interpretation should be obvious. To anyone who is actually unbiased that is...
This is not to say that she *wasn't* tossing in a double meaning there. I'm sure she was. However, she's counting on the very bias you seem to think you don't have in order to get that meaning. Get it? I'll ask a simple question: If you knew nothing more about Palin than the tweet referenced above, would you assume that the reload reference was about firearms? I know this is hard, but use your brains and imagine for a moment that someone you've never heard of before in your life posted that tweet and be honest about what it would mean to you. You'd *never* get a gun reference. Thus, your assumption is biased. Mine is *not*. Sheesh! If you're going to use words at least use them properly.
Edited, Jan 13th 2011 4:24pm by gbaji