Quote:
I do get it. You believe that poor people should overwhelmingly vote Democrat because the Democratic party passes economic spending bills which directly benefit them economically.
But when I responded to that and attempted to discuss that position, you abruptly changed the subject to talking about how the GOP is bad because they push god on people or something.
But when I responded to that and attempted to discuss that position, you abruptly changed the subject to talking about how the GOP is bad because they push god on people or something.
No, you very obviously DON'T get it. What actually happened was that you made some comment to the effect of, "Then why do lots of poor people vote for Republicans?" As you just said:
Quote:
Furthermore, I specifically said that not everyone agrees that it's actually in poor people's economic interest to be the recipients of those spending programs. I made that statement as an explanation to you as to why poor people don't all vote for the Democrats
...and I explained why: social issues, most of which, yes, are based on religion.
So I don't know what you wish the topic was or what kind of arguments you wish I was making and then backpedaling from, but I think it was pretty ******* clear what my argument was to everyone else. Maybe if you weren't so wrong you wouldn't have to try so hard to strawman me. Newsflash: I know what my arguments are. So either you don't, or you're pretending you don't because you don't like them. And it's getting awfully hard to give you the benefit of the doubt.