A big NO to 9/11 RespondersFollow

I was asking if you agree that the GOP didn't do this just to be mean to 9/11 first responders as I have been saying all along.

So your answer is that the GOP didn't do this just to be mean to first responders? That's all I needed from you.

Rereads title.
Rereads gbaji.
Re-rereads title.

Uh... gbaji? I think you're making things up again.

The title and OP weren't intended to suggest that the GOP filibustered this for no reason other than that they don't want 9/11 first responders to receive medical attention? Really? Why spend a whole paragraph talking about how there's "no miscellaneous activities, people, or projects being funding: it was directly to the emergency personnel who responded to the attacks and were hurt by it.".

If it wasn't your intent to say that the GOP was blocking this purely to prevent those first responders from receiving that medical aid, then what the hell was it? Why bother making a thread in the first place?

Actually, my first sentence said it was fiscally responsible. During the thread itself, Joph pointed out that last time this topic came up I was arguing against the bill. I brought it up because it was the newest part of that debate - it was later pointed out to me that the loophole covered all the expenses of the bill, thus meaning no one would be burdened and the tax would work as intended.

You're right. Cheers, gbaji. My OP implied that Republicans were blocking this solely to spite the Democrats.

I wish I could just decide not to show up for my job and still keep it...