Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Liberal Yankee JudgesFollow

#27 Nov 30 2010 at 6:38 PM Rating: Decent
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
"Yankee?" Really? You would use one of the most meaningless descriptors in the English language wouldn't you.
#28 Nov 30 2010 at 6:52 PM Rating: Excellent
****
5,684 posts
Allegory wrote:
"Yankee?" Really? You would use one of the most meaningless descriptors in the English language wouldn't you.
Varus is so far right he is a Redcoat Republican.
#29 Nov 30 2010 at 7:17 PM Rating: Decent
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
BrownDuck wrote:
Actually, I was curious myself so I looked it up:

http://www.handgunlaw.us/states/newjersey.pdf wrote:
New Jersey prohibits the manufacture, transport, shipment, sale or disposal of large capacity ammunition magazines, unless the magazine is intended to be used for authorized military or law enforcement purposes. N.J. Rev. Stat § 2C:39-9h. New Jersey law defines “large capacity ammunition magazine” as a box, drum, tube or other container which is capable of holding more than 15 rounds of ammunition to be fed continuously and directly into a semi-automatic firearm. Section 2C:39-1y


What they don't say in the article is exactly how "large capacity" this man's clips were. For example, he may have had a Glock with a capacity of 17 rounds. Doing so would clearly violate the law, but IMO, not justify the sentence handed down.


Yeah. Unfortunately, many of the laws banning "large capacity magazines" are specifically designed to ban the most commonly used gun types (and not necessarily the cheap ones commonly used on the street either). Most 9mm pistols hold 16 rounds in the magazine and one in the chamber. Makes the "more than 15" seems pretty obviously designed to make it impossible to own a "normal" 9mm. You'd have to actually get special short magazines in order to comply with the law.

I suppose it's possible that he was carrying around a 50 round drum or 30 round stick add on to his pistols, but I think it's overwhelmingly more likely that this was at best a technicality. Add to that the charge for the hollow points, which are legal if "on your property", which in this case packed in with other moving stuff (whether he'd completed the move or not) would qualify. Heck. Your car is your property. Assuming the gun itself was properly locked and ammunition kept separate, he should not have been in violation of the law. At least the bit that was quoted makes it appear that the purpose is to say that you can't wander around with a weapon loaded with hollow points. His weapon wasn't loaded.


Heck. How does one buy those hollow points anyway? It clearly isn't illegal to have them, or even to have them in a box in your car. I just really think this is a case of taking the literal words of the law to the most ridiculous extreme and applying no common sense at all.
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#30 Nov 30 2010 at 8:17 PM Rating: Good
How do we know this judge is liberal?

Just curious.

Liberal != someone you don't like.

Honestly, I had him pegged as *******/GoodOldBoy, but I'm not sure that's a political party any more. ("Hyuk hyuk I bet those cows ENJOYED it!" Typical fratard...)

#31gbaji, Posted: Nov 30 2010 at 9:01 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) The combination of strong opposition to guns and an apparently ambivalence towards alternative sexual activities (as long as the calves were "puzzled" instead of "alarmed" it's ok) certainly does seem to fit into the "liberal" category.
#32 Nov 30 2010 at 9:08 PM Rating: Good
Repressed Memories
******
21,027 posts
gbaji wrote:
and an apparently ambivalence towards alternative sexual activities (as long as the calves were "puzzled" instead of "alarmed" it's ok) certainly does seem to fit into the "liberal" category.

Screenshot
#33 Nov 30 2010 at 9:22 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
(as long as the calves were "puzzled" instead of "alarmed" it's ok) certainly does seem to fit into the "liberal" category.

Unless he wanted the cop beaten with a log for his crimes against God's creatures, then he's an activist liberal PETA fanatic. Can't win for losing.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#34 Nov 30 2010 at 9:26 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
Jophiel wrote:
gbaji wrote:
(as long as the calves were "puzzled" instead of "alarmed" it's ok) certainly does seem to fit into the "liberal" category.

Unless he wanted the cop beaten with a log for his crimes against God's creatures, then he's an activist liberal PETA fanatic. Can't win for losing.


Or he's a liberal PETA fanatic because he attributes human characteristics to animals, specifically making a judgment based on whether the calves seemed to consent to what was happening. You're right! There's no way to lose this one!
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#35 Nov 30 2010 at 9:27 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Except he was pro-livestock fucking which makes him pretty firmly a conservative redneck. Probably waits for fat guys to come into his woods so he can tell them to squeal like a pig.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#36 Nov 30 2010 at 9:28 PM Rating: Good
****
9,997 posts
Quote:
"Yankee?" Really? You would use one of the most meaningless descriptors in the English language wouldn't you.


No, see, conservatism just refers to wanting things to stay the same. It doesn't say the same as when. My suspicion has always been that varus wants to revert the country to a time before the Civil War. It allll makes sense.
#37REDACTED, Posted: Dec 01 2010 at 10:01 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#38 Dec 01 2010 at 10:04 AM Rating: Default
Kachi,

Quote:
My suspicion


lol...well that settles it.


#39 Dec 01 2010 at 10:07 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
Quote:
Wasn't Clerks II based in NJ? Didn't they have some good old fashioned man on mule lovin? And aren't the producers radical liberals? I think so.
You know what liberals like to do? make fun of conservatives. Clearly they were making fun of redneck okra farmers
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#40 Dec 01 2010 at 10:23 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
varusword75 wrote:
Wasn't Clerks II based in NJ? Didn't they have some good old fashioned man on mule lovin? And aren't the producers radical liberals? I think so.

I have no idea. You obviously explore the man-on-mule cinema sex industry in far more depth than I do.



Tee-hee... "depth"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#41 Dec 01 2010 at 10:29 AM Rating: Good
Gave Up The D
Avatar
*****
12,281 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Wasn't Clerks II based in NJ? Didn't they have some good old fashioned man on mule lovin? And aren't the producers radical liberals? I think so.


You forgot they're for same-sex marriage as well, the mule was male.
____________________________
Shaowstrike (Retired - FFXI)
91PUP/BLM 86SMN/BST 76DRK
Cooking/Fishing 100


"We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary."
— James D. Nicoll
#42REDACTED, Posted: Dec 01 2010 at 10:54 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#43 Dec 01 2010 at 10:57 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
varusword75 wrote:
You aint gotta lie craig.

I have no idea what this means. "Craig"? Is this a line from one of your mule-fucking movies?
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#44REDACTED, Posted: Dec 01 2010 at 11:00 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Joph,
#45 Dec 01 2010 at 11:10 AM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
Jophiel wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
You aint gotta lie craig.

I have no idea what this means. "Craig"? Is this a line from one of your mule-fucking movies?
I assumed it was a nod to Larry Craig
#46 Dec 01 2010 at 11:12 AM Rating: Good
I got it, but it certainly isn't for compassion. I just think Chris Tucker is a funny negro and have watched movies with him in them for a while.
#47 Dec 01 2010 at 11:12 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
I assumed he was talking about Ice Cube in Friday. Seems about where Varus would get all his "street" info.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#48 Dec 01 2010 at 11:14 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
varusword75 wrote:
Perhaps that's because you're not ethnically diverse enough.

Or because I don't watch as many bestiality flicks as you do. Who knows. But I think we've nailed this judge as a conservative given your fascination with the topic.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#49 Dec 01 2010 at 11:14 AM Rating: Good
****
5,684 posts
MoebiusLord wrote:
I got it, but it certainly isn't for compassion. I just think Chris Tucker is a funny negro and have watched movies with him in them for a while.
I only know it because they referenced it in a Psych episode.
#50REDACTED, Posted: Dec 01 2010 at 11:49 AM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Jophed,
#51 Dec 01 2010 at 11:52 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Yeah, I know you'd love to try and turn it around but the fact is that you're the one who can rattle off names, settings and even the directors of films with donkey-banging in them. I know you're sorry you admitted to it but saying "No U!" isn't going to change your admission to being well-versed in the topic.

Have fun with your... erm... "videos"
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 364 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (364)