Pope endorses **** :: Free Realms

Quote Reply

#27 Dec 06 2010 at 11:03 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1618186764728

Sage

5,684 posts

MoebiusLord wrote:

SideWalkPhilosophy wrote:

While the use of condoms obviously puts a huge dent in the spread of AIDS, it is not the AIDS virus that the Catholic Church is concerned with. Heck, I'm sure as far as the pope cares, those sinners deserve their suffering because "God is just and right".

No, the Catholic Church doesn't endorse condoms because condoms are an effective measure against pregnancy. Not that should be news to anyone here. Anyways, less babies means less little minds for the Church to warp. More babies, more zealots.

Vatican City doesn't really care how many of it's followers are suffering. They only care about how many suffering followers they can accumulate.

You should make a conscious effort not to post until you can add something that hasn't already been added or stipulated to.

eh, there is potential for this poster.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#28 Dec 06 2010 at 11:12 AM Rating: Good

Nadenu

Gurue

16,299 posts

MoebiusLord wrote:

SideWalkPhilosophy wrote:

While the use of condoms obviously puts a huge dent in the spread of AIDS, it is not the AIDS virus that the Catholic Church is concerned with. Heck, I'm sure as far as the pope cares, those sinners deserve their suffering because "God is just and right".

No, the Catholic Church doesn't endorse condoms because condoms are an effective measure against pregnancy. Not that should be news to anyone here. Anyways, less babies means less little minds for the Church to warp. More babies, more zealots.

Vatican City doesn't really care how many of it's followers are suffering. They only care about how many suffering followers they can accumulate.

You should make a conscious effort not to post until you can add something that hasn't already been added or stipulated to.

Then none of us would ever have anything to say. =(

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#29 Dec 06 2010 at 11:23 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1651450735431

View User Forum

Sage

10,246 posts

Nadenu wrote:

MoebiusLord wrote:

SideWalkPhilosophy wrote:

While the use of condoms obviously puts a huge dent in the spread of AIDS, it is not the AIDS virus that the Catholic Church is concerned with. Heck, I'm sure as far as the pope cares, those sinners deserve their suffering because "God is just and right".

No, the Catholic Church doesn't endorse condoms because condoms are an effective measure against pregnancy. Not that should be news to anyone here. Anyways, less babies means less little minds for the Church to warp. More babies, more zealots.

Vatican City doesn't really care how many of it's followers are suffering. They only care about how many suffering followers they can accumulate.

You should make a conscious effort not to post until you can add something that hasn't already been added or stipulated to.

Then none of us would ever have anything to say. =(

Yes, but you have nice tits, so you're clear.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#30 Dec 06 2010 at 5:16 PM Rating: Default

__DEL__1592322887153

123 posts

I think the pope was saying that condoms are less evil if you've got a life threatening STD and doing it with as many people as you can... not that using them is good.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#31 Dec 07 2010 at 5:45 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1630282721753

View User Forum

Sage

14,174 posts

MoebiusLord wrote:

Nadenu wrote:

Then none of us would ever have anything to say. =(

Yes, but you have nice tits, so you're clear.

What's your excuse?

...What's mine?

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#32 Dec 07 2010 at 8:18 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1651450735431

View User Forum

Sage

10,246 posts

Kavekk wrote:

MoebiusLord wrote:

Nadenu wrote:

Then none of us would ever have anything to say. =(

Yes, but you have nice tits, so you're clear.

What's your excuse?

...What's mine?

Someone has to talk about Nadenu's tits.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#33 Dec 07 2010 at 10:21 AM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1695601009560

Guru

18,463 posts

Lord Nobby wrote:

Pope's condom comments welcomed by campaign groups

Quote:

Pope Benedict said during a visit to Cameroon last year that handing out condoms might actually make HIV infection worse, drawing criticism from several EU states.

In his latest comments, however, he said the use of condoms might be justified in exceptional circumstances.

He gave the example of male prostitutes where, he said, using condoms to prevent the spread of AIDS could be seen as an act of moral responsibility, even though condoms were "not really the way to deal with the evil of HIV infection".

So you heard it here, folks. It's official.

Slip on a rubber and slip it in the Shitter. It's the Cafflick way.

Edited, Nov 21st 2010 6:22pm by Nobby

I'd like to use this opportunity to clear up an erroneous assumption people tend to make when speaking about this subject.

Gay male sex =/= *******.

Thank you.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#34 Dec 07 2010 at 10:46 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1651450735431

View User Forum

Sage

10,246 posts

Atomicflea wrote:

Lord Nobby wrote:

So you heard it here, folks. It's official.

Slip on a rubber and slip it in the Shitter. It's the Cafflick way.

Edited, Nov 21st 2010 6:22pm by Nobby

I'd like to use this opportunity to clear up an erroneous assumption people tend to make when speaking about this subject.

Gay male sex =/= sh*tter.

Thank you.

Pfft. And I suppose next you're going to tell me that girls don't pee from down there.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#35 Dec 08 2010 at 5:21 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1591986036140

Scholar

53 posts

Ted Haggard must be over the moon about this.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#36 Dec 08 2010 at 5:28 PM Rating: Good

__DEL__1618186764728

Sage

5,684 posts

SuperAthiest? Really? Now I know I don't exactly hold the high ground when it comes to forum names, but wow.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#37 Dec 08 2010 at 5:31 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1591986036140

Scholar

53 posts

Bardalicious wrote:

SuperAthiest? Really? Now I know I don't exactly hold the high ground when it comes to forum names, but wow.

What do you mean? I don't find it particularly offensive or anything. Maybe a bit immodest, so my apologies, I've just used this forever since I have a cool superman avatar I usually use with this name on forums.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#38 Dec 09 2010 at 1:55 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1636935913888

Sage

27,272 posts

I don't think Bard is offended by your name, he's just saying that it's a pretty sad name.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#39 Dec 09 2010 at 11:27 AM Rating: Default

__DEL__1591986036140

Scholar

53 posts

That's alright, he can have his opinion. I've seen worse/sadder names.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#40 Dec 09 2010 at 11:39 AM Rating: Good

__DEL__1618186764728

Sage

5,684 posts

His Excellency Aethien wrote:

I don't think Bard is offended by your name, he's just saying that it's a pretty sad name.

This.

It makes me think you are a 14 year old boy with ultraconservative religious parents that is trying to rebel a little too hard.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#41 Dec 09 2010 at 2:08 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1656893887359

Scholar

2,580 posts

Bardalicious wrote:

His Excellency Aethien wrote:

I don't think Bard is offended by your name, he's just saying that it's a pretty sad name.

This.

It makes me think you are a 14 year old boy with ultraconservative religious parents that is trying to rebel a little too hard.

Shouldn't he have named his accout "Flying Speghetti Monster" then?

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#42 Dec 09 2010 at 2:17 PM Rating: Excellent

__DEL__1657498899608

Guru

12,049 posts

Bardalicious wrote:

His Excellency Aethien wrote:

I don't think Bard is offended by your name, he's just saying that it's a pretty sad name.

This.

It makes me think you are a 14 year old boy with ultraconservative religious parents that is trying to rebel a little too hard.

Shador?

Quote:

Shouldn't he have named his accout "Flying Speghetti Monster" then?

There are facebook pictures of me dressed as a pirate preaching the Gospel of the FSM at my university. I also gave away free ramen! My tag line? "The Church of the FSM: we feed the soul AND the body!"

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#43 Dec 10 2010 at 6:28 PM Rating: Default

__DEL__1591986036140

Scholar

53 posts

Bardalicious wrote:

His Excellency Aethien wrote:

I don't think Bard is offended by your name, he's just saying that it's a pretty sad name.

This.

It makes me think you are a 14 year old boy with ultraconservative religious parents that is trying to rebel a little too hard.

Well you're assumption is far off, and you know what happens when you assume.

Actually, I'm exactly twice that age, and my father is an atheist and my mother is a deist, and both tend to have slightly liberal political views. Outside of my views on gay marriage and religion, I tend to be more on the conservative side actually.

I just tend to go on a lot of religious/atheist message boards so I tend to label myself as an atheist to make my position clear right off the bat and I have a cool superman-themed avatar I use on them with that name, so I just meshed Superman+Atheist to come up with SuperAtheist and for convenience sake I used the name here instead of remembering a bunch of different usernames for various message boards.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#44 Dec 11 2010 at 1:02 PM Rating: Decent

__DEL__1612743408497

View User Forum

29,185 posts

SuperAtheist wrote:

I used the name here instead of remembering a bunch of different usernames for various message boards.

How hard is it to remember a few names? Or hell, it doesn't even really matter if you remember them, that's why god invented cookies.

▲ Page top

Quote Reply

#45 Dec 11 2010 at 11:43 PM Rating: Decent