Forum Settings
       
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Let's get this out of the way early in the morningFollow

#1 Nov 06 2010 at 7:15 AM Rating: Good
Article: here

Short version: Keith Olbermann has been suspended indefinitely.

Not for badmouthing conservatives.

...For making a political contribution?!

Eh, whatever. The man is an sloppy, yet incredibly sandy, cunt.
#2 Nov 06 2010 at 7:17 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,362 posts
Eh. He deserved to be fired because he broke the rules of his contract. It's a shame, though. I didn't always agree with him, but he had his moments, and he was damned entertaining, which is all you can ask of cable news.
#3 Nov 06 2010 at 8:49 AM Rating: Decent
The outrage is because Joe Scarborough, a conservative pundit on the same network, was giving a pass for making political donations to Republicans in 2006 because MSNBC opinionators don't have to follow the same rules as the NBC reporters.

Is not Olbermann a pundit? You cannot expect me to believe that everyone thought his show was about reporting "just the facts." I mean, we all know reality has a liberal bias, but not that much of one. He reports a story, and then gives his opinion on them - like who is the "worst person in the world" for the day.

So Scarborough of Morning Joe is allowed to donate and it's waved away since his show is considered an opinion show, but Olbermann donates, and suddenly he's the antichrist.

In other words, it's okay if you're a Republican.
#4 Nov 06 2010 at 9:34 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
catwho wrote:
He reports a story, and then gives his opinion on them - like who is the "worst person in the world" for the day.


Just a minor point: he actually stopped the "worst person in the world" segment after the Rally to Restore Sanity.
#5 Nov 06 2010 at 10:43 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
If his contract forbade him from making contributions then he should be disciplined however the contract states. If they failed to do so with Scarborough a few years ago then the mistake was in not reprimanding Scarborough, not that they properly reprimanded Olbermann.

If their rules exempt pundits then Olbermann should have really been given a pass in my opinion but maybe both MSNBC and Olbermann operating under the knowledge that it's a "news" show or something. I'm sure Olbermann knows/knew how his show is classified with the Powers That Be.

Edited, Nov 6th 2010 11:45am by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#6 Nov 07 2010 at 10:57 AM Rating: Good
****
7,861 posts
Not knowing the rules of the NBC contracts, it specifically states in Olbermans contract that he cannot make any contributions to political candidates, *unless*, he gets prior approval from his bosses. His bosses claim that he did not take this step. Regardless of catwhos outrage, he broke the rules...plain and simple. I found Olberman to be entertaining as a sportscaster, as a political commentator...not so much.

Edited, Nov 7th 2010 11:58am by Kastigir
____________________________
People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome. ~River Tam

Sedao
#7 Nov 07 2010 at 11:15 AM Rating: Excellent
****
4,901 posts
If Fox News is considered news, then I guess Olbermann could be considered a news reporter.
____________________________
Love,
PunkFloyd
#8 Nov 07 2010 at 5:38 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,240 posts
Sounds like someone should have filtered their money through 3rd party sources.
____________________________
Just as Planned.
#9 Nov 07 2010 at 9:44 PM Rating: Good
It was kind of funny to watch him get worked up, but I'm not going to miss the guy.
#10 Nov 08 2010 at 12:33 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
You won't have to miss him. He's back on Tuesday.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#11 Nov 08 2010 at 1:15 AM Rating: Decent
***
3,362 posts
Jophiel wrote:
You won't have to miss him. He's back on Tuesday.
Now that's what I call indefinite.
#12 Nov 08 2010 at 2:52 AM Rating: Good
Well, that certainly cements MSNBC as kind of clueless.
#13 Nov 08 2010 at 7:10 AM Rating: Good
Soulless Internet Tiger
******
35,474 posts
MDenham wrote:
Well, that certainly cements MSNBC as kind of clueless.
Marketing.
____________________________
Donate. One day it could be your family.


An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come. Victor Hugo

#14 Nov 08 2010 at 7:13 AM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
"Indefinite" just means "we don't know yet", not "until the mountains crumble into the sea".
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#15 Nov 08 2010 at 8:17 AM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
LeWoVoc wrote:
Jophiel wrote:
You won't have to miss him. He's back on Tuesday.
Now that's what I call indefinite.


"Lasting for an unknown length of time"

No kidding?
#16 Nov 08 2010 at 9:18 AM Rating: Good
Jophiel wrote:
You won't have to miss him. He's back on Tuesday.


Smiley: lol
#17 Nov 08 2010 at 2:53 PM Rating: Decent
Edited by bsphil
******
21,739 posts
Well so much for that.
____________________________
His Excellency Aethien wrote:
Almalieque wrote:
If no one debated with me, then I wouldn't post here anymore.
Take the hint guys, please take the hint.
gbaji wrote:
I'm not getting my news from anywhere Joph.
#18 Nov 08 2010 at 3:34 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
catwho wrote:
Is not Olbermann a pundit? You cannot expect me to believe that everyone thought his show was about reporting "just the facts." I mean, we all know reality has a liberal bias, but not that much of one. He reports a story, and then gives his opinion on them - like who is the "worst person in the world" for the day.


Yes, of course he's a pundit. The problem is that MSNBC has him titled (apparently) as a "news reporter". Laughable, but there you have it. So all of this time they've been billing his show as "news"? Really!?


I'm sure all those posters who claimed I didn't know the difference between news and opinion will chime in to condemn MSNBC right about now. Or... now. Ok. Maybe we'll have to wait a really long time.

Quote:
So Scarborough of Morning Joe is allowed to donate and it's waved away since his show is considered an opinion show, but Olbermann donates, and suddenly he's the antichrist.

In other words, it's okay if you're a Republican.


No. What it means is that you can't tell the public you are reporting news and give them opinion instead. As long as you are clear about which you are doing, it's not a problem. You know. It's the whole "lying to the public" thing. I'm frankly curious why MSNBC cares about this. It's not like anyone takes them seriously anyway, but whatever.

Edited, Nov 8th 2010 1:34pm by gbaji
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
#19 Nov 08 2010 at 3:43 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
gbaji wrote:

I'm sure all those posters who claimed I didn't know the difference between news and opinion will chime in to condemn MSNBC right about now. Or... now. Ok. Maybe we'll have to wait a really long time.


Wait, for what are we condemning MSNBC? Olbermann went outside his contract, and was punished. Good on MSNBC!


Quote:
No. What it means is that you can't tell the public you are reporting news and give them opinion instead.


News analyst Juan Williams is SO pissed at you right now.

Edited, Nov 8th 2010 4:43pm by LockeColeMA
#20 Nov 08 2010 at 3:50 PM Rating: Good
LockeColeMA wrote:
gbaji wrote:

I'm sure all those posters who claimed I didn't know the difference between news and opinion will chime in to condemn MSNBC right about now. Or... now. Ok. Maybe we'll have to wait a really long time.


Wait, for what are we condemning MSNBC?


For calling Olbermann's show news.
#21 Nov 08 2010 at 3:53 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
gbaji wrote:
So all of this time they've been billing his show as "news"? Really!?

MSNBC wrote:
Keith Olbermann is host of “Countdown with Keith Olbermann.” “Countdown,” a unique newscast that counts down the day’s top stories with Keith’s particular wit and style, telecasts weeknights, 8-9 p.m. ET on msnbc.

So I suppose it's a "news" show in that it deals with the day's events and not just "Let's ***** about liberalism for an hour with a chalkboard" style punditry but makes it clear that it's not straight news.

Looking at a couple transcripts, each episode begins with:
Quote:
All the news and commentary—now on COUNTDOWN.


Seems right enough.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#22 Nov 08 2010 at 3:55 PM Rating: Excellent
*****
12,049 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
gbaji wrote:

I'm sure all those posters who claimed I didn't know the difference between news and opinion will chime in to condemn MSNBC right about now. Or... now. Ok. Maybe we'll have to wait a really long time.


Wait, for what are we condemning MSNBC?


For calling Olbermann's show news.


Ohhhh, gotcha. Sure, I find that laughable. Now we can agree FOX News isn't news too, right?
#23gbaji, Posted: Nov 08 2010 at 3:59 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Precisely. It's pretty darn obvious to all of us that what Olbermann does isn't "news". It's "opinion". Yet it's exactly because MSNBC bills his show as "news" that his contract doesn't allow him to donate politically (without approval apparently). It's not a great leap to see that the larger problem here isn't Olbmermann getting involved in politics, but with MSNBC essentially lying to the public by claiming that what he does is news.
#24 Nov 08 2010 at 4:03 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
You get a bee in your bonnet about your boogeyman not being fired? Whatever MSNBC has Olbermann classified as internally, they make clear what the context of his show is: News & Commentary (with Olbermann's unique wit and style!).

Edited, Nov 8th 2010 4:03pm by Jophiel
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#25 Nov 08 2010 at 4:11 PM Rating: Good
So basically, he's the same as Sean Hannity:

http://www.foxnews.com/bios/talent/sean-hannity/

Quote:
Sean Hannity joined the Fox News Channel (FNC) in September 1996. He currently hosts his self titled program, "Hannity" (Monday-Friday, 9-10 p.m. ET). He is one of the most prominent and influential conservative voices in the country and his program offers a mix of news, commentary, interviews and branded segments such as the Great American Panel


Apparently, Fox has much more lax views on what their "news" people can do.

Edited, Nov 8th 2010 5:12pm by Technogeek

edit to fix a pesky bold text

Edited, Nov 8th 2010 5:12pm by Technogeek
#26 Nov 08 2010 at 4:12 PM Rating: Default
Encyclopedia
******
35,568 posts
LockeColeMA wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
LockeColeMA wrote:
gbaji wrote:

I'm sure all those posters who claimed I didn't know the difference between news and opinion will chime in to condemn MSNBC right about now. Or... now. Ok. Maybe we'll have to wait a really long time.


Wait, for what are we condemning MSNBC?


For calling Olbermann's show news.


Ohhhh, gotcha. Sure, I find that laughable. Now we can agree FOX News isn't news too, right?


As I said in the last thread we had about this. Some of their shows are news and some are opinion. Odds are, you can't name any of the people who are actual "news reporters" on Fox News because the people you hear about are commentators/analysts (Hannity, O'Reilly, Beck, etc).

My biggest surprise here was that MSNBC actually considered Olbermann's show a "news show".
____________________________
King Nobby wrote:
More words please
« Previous 1 2
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 418 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (418)