Forum Settings
       
Reply To Thread

Judge Halts DADTFollow

#127 Oct 15 2010 at 12:58 PM Rating: Good
varusword75 wrote:
Yes I eat pork and no it's not in conflict with the teachings of Jesus.


Sexual promiscuity is in conflict with the teachings of Jesus.

As is lying.

So, either way, you're screwed.

Edited, Oct 15th 2010 1:59pm by Belkira
#128 Oct 15 2010 at 1:00 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Yes I eat pork and no it's not in conflict with the teachings of Jesus.


Sexual promiscuity is in conflict with the teachings of Jesus.

As is lying.

So, either way, you're screwed.

Edited, Oct 15th 2010 1:59pm by Belkira
Yes, but he can pick and choose which parts of the Bible to listen to, and just ask Jesus for forgiveness later. It's like you don't know anything about Christianity at all, Bel. Smiley: oyvey
#129 Oct 15 2010 at 1:01 PM Rating: Excellent
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Yes I eat pork and no it's not in conflict with the teachings of Jesus.


Sexual promiscuity is in conflict with the teachings of Jesus.

As is lying.

So, either way, you're screwed.

Edited, Oct 15th 2010 1:59pm by Belkira
Yes, but he can pick and choose which parts of the Bible to listen to, and just ask Jesus for forgiveness later. It's like you don't know anything about Christianity at all, Bel. Smiley: oyvey


He can, but the homos can't? Smiley: frown

Edited, Oct 15th 2010 2:01pm by Belkira
#130 Oct 15 2010 at 1:01 PM Rating: Excellent
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
AshOnMyTomatoes wrote:
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Yes I eat pork and no it's not in conflict with the teachings of Jesus.


Sexual promiscuity is in conflict with the teachings of Jesus.

As is lying.

So, either way, you're screwed.

Edited, Oct 15th 2010 1:59pm by Belkira
Yes, but he can pick and choose which parts of the Bible to listen to, and just ask Jesus for forgiveness later. It's like you don't know anything about Christianity at all, Bel. Smiley: oyvey


He can, but the homos can't? Smiley: frown

Edited, Oct 15th 2010 2:01pm by Belkira
Now you're getting it! Smiley: schooled
#131REDACTED, Posted: Oct 15 2010 at 1:04 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Ash,
#132 Oct 15 2010 at 1:05 PM Rating: Good
varusword75 wrote:
Quote:
Abortion: not discussed at all in the Bible, acceptable under US law, unacceptable for Conservatives, because they say so.


Quote:
"Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin.


Leviticus 18:22


Abortion = Homosexuality now...?

And, going by that passage, am I to assume you're ok with lesbians, then?
#133REDACTED, Posted: Oct 15 2010 at 1:06 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Tulip,
#134 Oct 15 2010 at 1:07 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
I love how you can write "Do you ever get tired of not knowing what the hell you're talking about?" in a post, then later in the same post try to explain things using the bible and confuse abortion with homosex.
#135REDACTED, Posted: Oct 15 2010 at 1:08 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Tulip,
#136 Oct 15 2010 at 1:09 PM Rating: Excellent
varusword75 wrote:
Tulip,

I'm the only here telling the truth. My conscious is clear; how about yours?

And i'm not sexually promiscuous, not anymore.


My conscious is great. I'm all for giving all of god's creatures equal treatment and not demonizing some of them for how god made them.
#137 Oct 15 2010 at 1:09 PM Rating: Good
varusword75 wrote:
Tulip,

Wrong passage, I got distracted.

I meant to post the verse "I knew you while you were in the womb".



What's that got to do with abortion?
#138 Oct 15 2010 at 1:10 PM Rating: Good
Avatar
*****
13,007 posts
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
varusword75 wrote:
Tulip,

Wrong passage, I got distracted.

I meant to post the verse "I knew you while you were in the womb".



What's that got to do with abortion?
Yeah, that passage actually is referring to someone else that knew Jesus was going to be holy before he was even born. Is that really all you got varrus?
#139REDACTED, Posted: Oct 15 2010 at 1:11 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Tulip,
#140 Oct 15 2010 at 1:12 PM Rating: Good
***
1,594 posts
varusword75 wrote:
lolgaxe,

Quote:
Murder is okay for Southern Baptists


And murdering babies is okay for Democrats.


Pretty sure Democrats are not in favor of infanticide. Oh, wait, you're trying to call something bad by saying it's something it's not.
#141 Oct 15 2010 at 1:13 PM Rating: Default
Tulip,

Quote:
I'm all for giving all of god's creatures equal treatment


Except babies of course.

#142 Oct 15 2010 at 1:17 PM Rating: Excellent
*******
50,767 posts
varusword75 wrote:
lolgax,

Quote:
We take that whole Army Creed thing pretty serious.


No you don't, stop lying. Unit Core God Country...in that order.
First, that would be the Marine. You'd think someone who played basketball with their paper pushers could tell the difference. Second, its CORPS, idiot. Not core. Third, notice how Unit and Corps come before God? Yeah, those would be the soldiers if you couldn't tell. That would include "dem dere ****" that have your panties in a bunch.

Finally, "Unit, Corps, God, Country" isn't part of any military branch's creed. See, the Army one states "I will never leave a fallen comrade." Even the Airman's Creed mentions never leaving people behind. The Marine one just talks about rifles (Its called the Rifleman's Creed, afterall), while the Navy one ... well, the Navy one just sucks.

Come to think of it, I'm pretty sure that whole "Unit, Corps, God, Country" thing is just a line from a movie to begin with. I've never heard anyone say it outside "A Few Good Men."

Edited, Oct 15th 2010 3:21pm by lolgaxe
____________________________
George Carlin wrote:
I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.
#143 Oct 15 2010 at 1:19 PM Rating: Good
varusword75 wrote:
Tulip,

That verse alone shows us that a fetus is ALIVE! And to extinguish that life with pre-meditation is murder.



Hm. Fair enough, I suppose.
#144 Oct 15 2010 at 1:21 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Belkira the Tulip wrote:
I'm all for giving all of god's creatures equal treatment
Solomon wrote:
Man's fate is like that of the animals; the same fate awaits them both: As one dies, so dies the other. All have the same breath; man has no advantage over the animal. Everything is meaningless. All go to the same place; all come from dust, and to dust all return.

Solomon went on to form the band Kansas.
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#145 Oct 15 2010 at 1:39 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Nadenu,

Quote:
Why does this bother you?


Why doesn't it bother you?


Because I don't plan on sharing needles or having unprotected sex with strangers.
#146 Oct 15 2010 at 1:42 PM Rating: Excellent
Liberal Conspiracy
*******
TILT
Sharing needles while having unprotected sex with strangers isn't something you plan, it's the mark of a free spirit!
____________________________
Belkira wrote:
Wow. Regular ol' Joph fan club in here.
#147 Oct 15 2010 at 1:43 PM Rating: Good
Gurue
*****
16,299 posts
varusword75 wrote:
angie,

Quote:
He was talking about Christianity's laws, which says murder is murder no matter what the cause.


And this is what the radical left want you to believe. It's not true, but don't worry about that right now.

Relevant link is relevant.
#148 Oct 15 2010 at 1:50 PM Rating: Good
***
3,362 posts
varusword75 wrote:
Ash,

Quote:
War killing: murder by the Bible's definition, acceptable under US law, acceptable for Conservatives, because they say so.


Do you ever get tired not knowing what the h*ll you're talking about?

Quote:
Many people make the mistake of reading what the Bible says in Exodus 20:13, “You shall not kill,” and then seeking to apply this command to war. However, the Hebrew word literally means “the intentional, premeditated killing of another person with malice; murder.” God often ordered the Israelites to go to war with other nations (1 Samuel 15:3; Joshua 4:13). God ordered the death penalty for numerous crimes (Exodus 21:12, 15; 22:19; Leviticus 20:11). So, God is not against killing in all circumstances, but only murder. War is never a good thing, but sometimes it is a necessary thing. In a world filled with sinful people (Romans 3:10-18), war is inevitable. Sometimes the only way to keep sinful people from doing great harm to the innocent is by going to war.



Quote:
Abortion: not discussed at all in the Bible, acceptable under US law, unacceptable for Conservatives, because they say so.


Quote:
"Do not practice homosexuality, having sex with another man as with a woman. It is a detestable sin.


Leviticus 18:22
I didn't say it wasn't in Leviticus, you ****. I said (bolded and underlined for your convenience) JESUS SAID NOTHING AGAINST HOMOSEXUALITY
#149Almalieque, Posted: Oct 15 2010 at 3:36 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) I see, I'm a 25A and will more than likely be the SIGO. I've heard the SIGO is typically a fobbit. I want to get a company though and get some command time ( I love Soldiers), if I'm lucky to get that position, I would imagine that I would be outside the wire more.
#150REDACTED, Posted: Oct 15 2010 at 3:57 PM, Rating: Sub-Default, (Expand Post) Alma,
#151 Oct 15 2010 at 4:06 PM Rating: Good
Almalieque wrote:
So, basically you're a hypocrite?

You were getting in a huge hissy fit how it wasn't fair that a **** has to cover up their feelings in the military even though they have the right to serve, therefore the rule must be changed because certain heterosexuals can be open about certain sexual qualities.

Now, you say it's all "fine and dandy" that a man Soldier can't room with his wife, but a man can room with his husband? Really? You some how think that's fair? Why in the world would you want to room with a stranger when you can be with your spouse. Matter of fact, in a normal unit, the Soldier is authorized to live off post to be with their spouse. In the school house, that is not the case.

This is why your argument is flawed, it's not based on any logic, just an emotional motive towards a cause at any cost necessary. That's dangerous in any scenario.


Yeah, that doesn't make me a hypocrite. I would be a hypocrite if I, for example, was fine with heterosexuals being open about their sexuality in the military, but wanted those damn homos to keep it under wraps. That would make me a hypocrite.

And I'm pretty sure the military will adapt to open homosexuality in the military. If two men are married, I'm sure they'll make them follow protocol.

Matter of fact, it sounds like I've got more confidence in the military's ability to handle this than you do, and you work for them. Sad, really. Smiley: frown

ETA: Oh, and I'll state, again, that I'm fine with acknowledging that I get emotionally invested in making sure that all citizens are treated equally in the eyes of the law. It's better to know what you're thinking and feeling than to try to hide it by spouting crap about "logic" that doesn't really make any sense. I can be emotionally involved in an issue and still see the logic in my position. Something you seem to lack, unfortunately.

Edited, Oct 15th 2010 5:08pm by Belkira
Reply To Thread

Colors Smileys Quote OriginalQuote Checked Help

 

Recent Visitors: 446 All times are in CST
Anonymous Guests (446)